Following the murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery in 2020, a rise in social consciousness swept across the United States. These incidents prompted many firms to issue statements and dedicate resources to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). However, how DEI is addressed in design firms’ public-facing communication is underexplored. This study offers a summative content analysis of insights, white papers, and reports published by nine leading U.S. architecture and design firms to understand how the industry engages with issues of inequality. As design firms’ media contribute to the industry’s culture, this study highlights aspects of their leadership in addressing contemporary social challenges. Findings are organized in two main sections: overarching trends in DEI communications and an in-depth analysis of identity representation using the Four Layers of Diversity Framework. Overall, leading firms frame design as a force for social change within broader socio-ecological systems, emphasizing the ethical and business cases for DEI, particularly in the surge of publications post-2020. However, the diversity of identities represented remains uneven. Categories such as race, gender and sexuality, abilities, and age receive more attention than religion and socio-economic status. Content types such as design guidelines and industry insights, firms’ culture and policies, historical and employee profiles, and project case studies also highlight some identities more than others. Beyond offering insights into the design industry’s DEI engagement, this study contributes a novel approach to evaluating DEI communication by critically analyzing how different identities are portrayed, a topic that has been overlooked in corporate studies that mainly focus on DEI communication and business outcomes.
BakerA. C.LarckerD. F.McClureC. G.SaraphD.WattsE. M. (2024). Diversity washing. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1661–1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12542
8.
BennettK. C. (2023). How “well” are we DEI-ing? Applying technical and professional communication theory and disability justice to challenge intersectional ableism in job advertisements through coalitional recruitment. Technical Communication, 70(3), 77–96.
9.
BertolaL. (2025). The intersection of religion, spirituality, and diversity: Pathways to inclusive practices. In MarquesJ. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity, equity, inclusion and spirituality (pp. 1–9). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Carter-CurtisN. Y. (2024). Chief diversity officers: Perceptions of tokenism, job engagement, and institutional commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion [Doctoral dissertation]. Azusa Pacific University.
ComelloM. L.JainP.FrancisD. B.PorterJ.LakeS.ThompsonJ.GrayJ. (2024). DEI in crisis: Reframing diversity, equity, and inclusion workplace programming as a health issue. Communication Studies, 75(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2024.2390725
17.
CoombsW. T.TachkovaE. R. (2022). Elaborating the concept of threat in contingency theory: An integration with moral outrage and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 48(4), 102234.
GardenswartzL.RoweA. (2003). Diverse teams at work: Capitalizing on the power of diversity. Society for Human Resource Management.
29.
GardenswartzL.RoweA. (2009). The effective management of cultural diversity. In MoodianM. A. (Ed.), Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: Exploring the cross-cultural dynamics within organizations (pp. 35–43). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Gensler. (2022). Models for Co-Creation and Partnership with the Black Community.
33.
GillbergN. (2024). Online corporate communication of diversity and inclusion: Washing as aspirational talk. Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 43(9), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2023-0250
HallS. (1997). The spectacle of the Other. In HallS.EvansJ.NixonS. (Eds.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–290). Sage.
36.
HansenK.SeierstadC. (2017). Introduction: CSR and diversity management. In HansenK.SeierstadC. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and diversity management: Theoretical approaches and best practices (pp. 1–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43564-0_1
HeatherlyK. A.YangS.-U.BrowningN.KimE. (2022). Words, money, or action? How corporate social advocacy drove media coverage in response to the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020. The Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.
HoltK. S. (2024). How can DEI training change the culture of an organization to achieve belonging and retain diverse employees? [University Honors Thesis, University Honors College]. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.1598
43.
HoytW. T. (2018). Interrater reliability and agreement. In HancockG. R.StapletonL. M.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 132–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649
44.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
45.
HuberA. (2018). Exploring interior designers: Research utilization strategies and information-seeking behaviors. Journal of Interior Design, 43(2), 11–31.
JohnsN.GreenA.PowellM. (2012). Diversity in the British NHS: The business versus the “moral” case. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(8), 768–783. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211277626
52.
KidderD. L.LankauM. J.Chrobot-MasonD.MollicaK. A.FriedmanR. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022908
LiF.LoC. K. Y.TangC. S.ZhouP. (2024). Will diversity, equity, and inclusion commitment improve manufacturing firms’ market performance? A signaling theory perspective on DEI announcements. Production and Operations Management, 34(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241265479
55.
MacnamaraJ. R. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodologyAsia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34.
56.
MartinezV. R. (2023). Reframing the DEI case. Seattle University Law Review, 36(2), 399–420.
McQuailD. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Sage.
59.
MohammedH.MoreP. P.SaudagarO. V. (2025). An exploratory text-mining approach to analyzing DEI-related issues in eight leading architecture & design firms’ publications. The Design Journal, 28, 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2025.2482556
ParkG.NandaU.AdamsL.EssaryJ.HoeltingM. (2020). Creating and testing a sensory well–being hub for adolescents with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Interior Design, 45(1), 13–32.
Piñeiro-NavalV.IgartuaJ. J.Rodríguez-de-DiosI. (2018). Identity-related implications of the dissemination of cultural heritage through the Internet: A study based on framing theory. Communication & Society, 31(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.31.1.1-21
SchreierM. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
80.
TimkeE.NelsonM. R. (2025). Reckoning with representation: Disability and DEI in the post-Floyd advertising landscape. In WillisE.PainterC. (Eds.), Communicating disability (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
WangW.DinhJ. V.JonesK. S.UpadhyayS.YangJ. (2023). Corporate diversity statements and employees’ online DEI ratings: An unsupervised machine-learning text-mining analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09819-x
WilloughbyJ. F.CoutoL.KangS.RandallJ.KirkpatrickA. W.LeeD. K. L.SuY.BoothA. M.DomgaardS. (2024). An exploratory content analysis of the use of health communication strategies and presence of objectification in fitness influencer social media posts. Health Communication, 39(5), 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2190248
