The Child and Adolescent PsychProfiler version 5 (CAPP v5) is a comprehensive multi‑informant screening measure encompassing 17 symptom scales that map onto 14 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) disorders. The self‑report form (CAPP‑SRF) has not previously undergone a comprehensive psychometric evaluation. The objective of the study is to analyze the internal structure (Independent Clusters Model of Confirmatory Factor Analysis [ICM‑CFA]), reliability (α, ω), and validity evidence (discriminant, convergent, criterion‑related) of the CAPP‑SRF. Study 1 examined the 17‑factor model within a community sample of 790 adolescents (M = 14.48 years). Study 2 evaluated convergent, criterion‑related, and discriminant validity in a clinic‑referred sample of 173 adolescents (M = 14.50 years) utilizing the Conners 3‑SR, Beck Youth Inventories, Second Edition (BYI‑2), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC‑V), and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition (WIAT‑III). Independent‑samples t tests compared CAPP‑SRF means across samples. The ICM‑CFA analysis confirmed the 17‑factor structure (χ²/df = 3.02; standardized root mean squared error [SRMR] = .076). Scale reliability was acceptable (ω = .79–.89). Clinic participants scored significantly higher than community participants on 15 of the 17 scales (all p < .001; d = .55–1.20), supporting criterion validity. Convergent and discriminant patterns with external measures were as hypothesized (|r| = .32–.68; R2 = .10–.46). The CAPP‑SRF demonstrates robust psychometric properties and complements the parent‑ and teacher‑report forms as an effective adolescent self‑report screener for common DSM‑5 disorders.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
2.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing.
BaguleyT. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X377117
7.
BandalosD. L.FinneyS. J. (2010). Factor analysis. Exploratory and confirmatory. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social science (pp. 93–114). Routledge.
8.
BeckJ. S.BeckA. T.JollyJ. B.SteerR. (2005). Beck Youth Inventories Second Edition for children and adolescents (BYI-II). Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
9.
BeitchmanJ. H.HoodJ.RochonJ.PetersonM. (1989). Empirical classification of speech/language impairment in children II. Behavioral characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198901000-00022
10.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
11.
ConnersC. K. (2008). Conners 3 manual (3rd ed.). Multi-Health Systems Inc.
12.
CornoldiC.Di CaprioR.De FrancescoG.ToffaliniE. (2019). The discrepancy between verbal and visuoperceptual IQ in children with a specific learning disorder: An analysis of 1624 cases. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 87, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.02.002
13.
FairburnC. G.BohnK. (2005). Eating disorder NOS (EDNOS): An example of the troublesome ‘‘not otherwise specified’’ (NOS) category in DSM-IV. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.011
14.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
15.
GadowK. D.SprafkinJ.CarlsonG. A.SchneiderJ.NolanE. E.MattisonR. E.Rundberg-RiveraV. (2002). A DSM-IV–referenced, adolescent self-report rating scale. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200206000-00006
16.
GearyD. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
HawkinsM.ElsworthG. R.HobanE.OsborneR. H. (2020). Questionnaire validation practice within a theoretical framework: a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments. BMJ 10:e035974. https://doi.org/10.1146/doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035974
20.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
HurleyA. E.ScanduraT. A.SchresheimC. A.BrannickM. T.SeersA.VandenbergR. J.WilliamsL. J. (1997). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Guidelines, Issues, and Alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:6<667:AID-JOB874>3.0.CO;2-T
22.
JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.16.6.0) [Computer Software].
23.
JensenP. S.Rubio-StipecM.CaninoG., et al, . (1999). Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: Are both informants always necessary?Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199912000-00019
24.
KlineR. B. (1998). Structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
25.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
26.
KlineT. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage.
27.
LangsfordS.GomezR.HoughtonS.KarimiL. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent PsychProfiler v5: A measure for screening 14 of the most common DSM-5 disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1267711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1267711
LangsfordS.HoughtonS.DouglasG. (2014). PsychProfiler v5 manual. Psychological and Educational Consultancy Services.
30.
LawrenceD.LangsfordS.HoughtonS. (2020). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Psychprofiler V5 (unpublished). Psychological and Educational Consultancy Services.
31.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2007). Learning, attention, writing, and processing speed in typical children and children with ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 13, 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040601112773
32.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
33.
PavlovG.Maydeu-OlivaresA.ShiD. (2021). Using the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) to assess exact fit in structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420926231
34.
PelhamW. E.JrFabianoG. A.MassettiG. M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_5
35.
PolanczykG.V.SalumG.A.SugayaL. S.RohdeL. A. (2015). Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12381
RiceM. L. (2016). Specific language impairment, nonverbal IQ, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, cochlear implants, bilingualism, and dialectal variants: Defining the boundaries, clarifying clinical conditions, and sorting out causes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0255
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
40.
SnowlingM. J.NashH. M.GoochD. C.Hayiou-ThomasM., E.HulmeC. (2019). Developmental outcomes for children at high risk of Dyslexia and Children with Developmental Language Disorder. Child Development, 90, e548–e564. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.132
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
43.
ThastumM.RavnK.SommerS.TrillingsgaardA. (2009). Reliability, validity and normative data for the Danish Beck Youth Inventories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00690
44.
UllmanJ. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 528–612). Pearson Education.
45.
WatkinsM. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
46.
WechslerD. (2016a). Wechsler intelligence scale for children, Fifth Edition: Australian and New Zealand Standardised Edition. Pearson.
47.
WechslerD. (2016b). Wechsler individual achievement test, Third Edition: Australian and New Zealand Standardised Edition. Pearson.
48.
ZinbargR. E.RevelleW.YovelI.LiW. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
