This study examines the internal consistency and temporal stability of informant ratings from two widely used instruments for normal personality assessment, the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and the Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS). Wellknown adult targets were selected by 109 undergraduate students and rated on two occasions separated by a 6-month interval. With few exceptions, estimates of internal consistency are adequate to good for both instruments. NEO PI-R domain scores yield coefficient alphas ranging from .89 to .96, with a median of .80 for the 30 facet scales. 1AS octant scales show coefficient alphas ranging from .83 to .92. Retest Pearson correlations are above .70 for each of the NEO PI-R domain scores and both IAS axis coordinates, and intraclass correlations are above .60 for all scales from both instruments. Score changes were small but statistically significant for three of the five NEO PI-R domains at retest. The retest stability of IAS type classifications varies as a function of the extremity of the associated octant scores.
Ben-Porath, Y. S.
, & Waller, M. K. (1992). Five big issues in personality assessment: A rejoinder to Costa and McCrae. Psychological Assessment, 4, 23-25.
2.
Carson, R. C.
(1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
3.
Cicchetti, D. V.
(1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
4.
Conley, J. J.
(1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait-multimethod-multioccasion analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1266-1282.
5.
Costa, P. T., Jr.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.
6.
Costa, P. T., Jr.
, & McCrae R. R. (1992a). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
Costa, P. T., Jr.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
8.
Costa, P. T., Jr.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1992c). Trait psychology comes of age. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and aging (pp. 169-204). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
Costa, P. T., Jr.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Stability and change in personality assessment: The revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000.Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 86-94.
10.
Digman, J. M.
(1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
11.
John, O. P.
(1990). The "big five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
12.
John, O. P.
, & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self.Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
13.
John, O. P.
, & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in selfenhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.
14.
Kiesler, D. J.
(1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
15.
Kurtz, J. E.
, Putnam, S. H., & Stone, C. (1998). Stability of normal personality traits after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 1-14.
16.
Leary, T.
(1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
17.
McCrae, R. R.
(1993). Agreement of personality profiles across observers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 25-40.
18.
McCrae, R. R.
(1994). The counterpoint of personality assessment: Self-report and observer ratings. Assessment, 1, 159-172.
19.
McCrae, R. R.
, & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 245-255.
20.
Muten, E.
(1991). Self-reports, spouse ratings, and psychophysiological assessment in a behavioral medicine program: An application of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 449-464.
21.
Norman, W. T.
(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 166, 574-583.
22.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Paunonen, S. V.
(1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.
24.
Piedmont, R. L.
(1993). A longitudinal analysis of burnout in the health care setting: The role of personal dispositions.Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 457-473.
25.
Piedmont, R. L.
(1994). Validation of the NEO PI-R observer form for college students: Toward a paradigm for studying personality development. Assessment, 1, 259-268.
26.
Piedmont, R. L.
, & Chae, J. (1997). Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality: Development and validation of the NEO PI-R for Koreans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 131-155.
27.
Putnam, S. H.
, Kurtz,J. E., & Houts, D. C. (1996). Fourmonth test-retest reliability of the MMPI-2 with normal male clergy.Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 341-353.
28.
Schinka, J. A.
, Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138.
29.
Shrout, P. E.
, & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
30.
Trull, J. T.
, Useda, J. D., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), the NEO-PI, and the NEO PI-R. Psychological Assessment, 7, 508-516.
31.
Wiggins, J. S.
(1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
