Images derived from science fiction have been widely used to discuss the emerging science of nanotechnology. Such usage also reflects what it takes to make science noteworthy, interesting, and important. According to journalist Gary Stix, science fiction imagery has helped “to create a fascination with the small that genuine scientists, consciously or not, would later use to draw attention to their work on more mundane but eminently more real projects” (Stix 2001, 36). The vocabulary of sci-fi has ultimately enabled those enthusiastic about nanotechnology to transcend the limits of the popular rhetorical habits put on science and its place in modern culture.
Atterbery, B.2004. Dust, lust and other messages from the quantum wonderland . In Nanoculture: Implications of the new technoscience, edited by N. Katherine Hayles and Danielle Foushee, 161-72. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
3.
Bauer, Henry H.1992. Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method . Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
4.
Bear, Greg.1985. Blood music. New York: Arbor House.
5.
———. 1990. Queen of angels. New York, NY: Warner Books.
6.
———. 1993. Moving Mars. New York: Tor.
7.
Beck, Ulrich.1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity, translated by Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications .
Berne, Rosalyn W., and Joachim Schummer .2005. Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society25:459-68.
10.
Blish, James.2003. Surface tension. In In this world, or another , 326-410. Waterville, ME: Five Star.
11.
Broderick, Damien.1997. The spike. Reed.
12.
Brown, Nik, Brian Rappert , and Andrew Webster, eds. 2000. Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science . Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
13.
Cannon, Susan Faye.1978. Science in culture. New York: Science History Publications.
14.
Carried away with convergence. 2003. New Atlantis , Summer: 102-5.
15.
Carver, Jeffrey A.1988. From a changeling star. New York: Bantam Books.
16.
Clareson, Thomas D., ed. 1984. Science fiction in America, 1870s-1930s: An annotated bibliography of primary sources. Westport, CT : Greenwood Press.
17.
Clement, Hal.1999. Needle. In The essential Hal Clement. Vol. 1, Trio for slide rule and typewriter, edited by Mark L. Olson and Anthony R. Lewis.Framingham, MA: NESFA Press.
18.
Cobb, M.D., and J. Macoubrie.2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits, and trust. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
19.
Collins, Graham P.2001. Shamans of the small. Scientific American , September: 86-91.
20.
Corn, Joseph J., ed. 1986. Imagining tomorrow: History, technology, and the American future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Cramer, John G.1990a. Technology fiction (part I). Foresight Update, March 15. http://www.foresight.org/Updates/Update08/Update08.2.html#anchor347966 (accessed January 10, 2005).
22.
———. 1990b. Technology fiction (part II). Foresight Update, June 30. http://www.foresight.org/Updates/Update09/Update09.5.html#anchor107771 (accessed January 10, 2005).
23.
Crichton, Michael.2002. Prey. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
24.
Curtis, Gregory.1997. Richard Smalley. Texas Monthly, September.
25.
Cushing, Karl.2003. The truth behind Charles' grey goo fears: Will microscopic robots radically change the world around us? Computer Weekly , May 20.
26.
Dann, Jack, and Gardner Dozois.1998. Preface. In Nanotech , edited by Jack Dann and Gardner Dozois, v-xi. New York: Ace Books.
27.
Daniels, George H.1968. American science in the age of Jackson. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
Dembski, William.1999. Intelligent Design: The bridge between science & theology . Downer's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
29.
———. 2004. The design revolution. Downer's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
30.
Dick, Philip K.1987. Autofac. In The collected stories of Philip K. Dick. Vol. 4, The days of Perky Pat, 1-20. Los Angeles: Underwood/Miller.
31.
Di Filippo, Paul.2001. Review of Major ingredients: The selected short stories of Eric Frank Russell. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue205/books2.html (accessed March 5, 2005).
32.
Drexler, K. Eric.1986. Engines of creation. Garden City, NY : Anchor Press/Doubleday.
33.
———. 2004. You have been “grey gooed.”The Times Higher Education Supplement, June 18.
34.
Einstein, David.1999. Stranger than fiction: From nanotechnology to superluminal travel, today's sci-fi writers may have envisioned the future of technology . San Francisco Chronicle, January 4.
35.
Faber, B.2006. Representations of nanoscience and technology in popular media. Technical Communication Quarterly15:141-69.
36.
Faber, B., J. MacKinnon, and M. Petroccione.2005. Media portraits of nanotech in North American written media, 1986-2000. Nanotechnology Law and Review2. http://www.nanolabweb.com/index.cfm/action/main.default.viewArticle/articleID/103/index.htm (accessed May 31, 2007).
37.
Feyerabend, Paul.1975. Against method. New Left Books.
38.
Feynman, Richard.1961. There's plenty of room at the bottom. In Miniaturization, edited by Horace D.Gilbert, 282-296. New York: Reinhold .
39.
Franklin, H. Bruce.1988. War stars: The superweapon and the American imagination . New York, NY: Oxford Press.
40.
Freitas, Robert A., Jr.1999. Nanomedicine. Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience. http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine (accessed May 10, 2006 ).
41.
Friend, Tim.2002. MIT's future soldier resembles comic-book heroine. USA Today, August 29.
42.
Gieryn, Thomas F.1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48:781-95.
43.
———. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
44.
Gilbert, James.1997. Redeeming culture: American religion in an age of science . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Gilder, George, and Richard Vigilante .2001. Stop everything . . . it's techno-horror! TheAmerican Spectator, March.
46.
Goonan, Kathleen Ann.1994. Queen city jazz. New York: Tor.
47.
Goonan, Kathleen Ann, M. Todd Washington, Stephen Gillett, and Wil McCarthy.2000. Nanotechnology. February 22. http://www.scifi.com/transcripts/2000/nanotech.html (accessed March 22, 2004).
48.
Gorss, Jason, and Bruce Lewenstein .2005. The salience of the small: Nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986-2004. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association , May 26-30, New York, NY.
49.
Grodal, Stine.2005. The emergence of nanotechnology: A rhetorical analysis of an evolving field. Paper presented at the Chemical Heritage Foundation Cain Conference on Nano before There Was Nano: Historical Perspectives on the Constituent Communities of Nanotechnology, March 19, Philadelphia, PA.
50.
Hall, J. Storrs.1993. Utility fog: The stuff that dreams are made of. http://discuss.foresight.org/~josh/Ufog.html (accessed May 30, 2006).
51.
Hamilton, Sheryl N.2003. Traces of the future: Biotechnology, science fiction, and the media. Science FictionStudies30:267-82.
52.
Hanlon, Michael.2003. Vision of doom. Queensland Sunday Mail , February 16.
53.
Hansen, Bert.1998. America's first medical breakthrough: How popular excitement about a French rabies cure in 1885 raised new expectations for medical progress . American Historical Review103:373-418.
54.
Hass, B., and M. Kleine.2003. The rhetoric of junk science. Technical Communication Quarterly12:267-84.
55.
Heinlein, Robert A.1959. Starship troopers. New York, NY: Putnam.
56.
———. 1970. Waldo. In Waldo & magic, Inc, 9-104. New York: Signet.
57.
Herrera, S.2002. In nanotechnology, Josh Wolfe is at the door. Red Herring, January.
58.
Holt, Jim.2005. Madness about a method. New York Times Magazine, December 11.
59.
Holt, Nicholas.2002. MIT's super soldier design swiped from small press comic book. Asheville Global Report, September 12-18. http://www.agrnews.org/issues/191/nationalnews.html (accessed January 31, 2005).
60.
Howard, Sean.2002. Nanotechnology and mass destruction: The need for an inner space treaty. Disarmament Diplomacy, July-August. http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd65/65op1.htm (accessed November 12, 2004).
61.
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory.1976. The formation of the American scientific community. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
62.
Kurtz, Paul.1994. The growth of antiscience. Skeptical Inquirer , Spring.
63.
Kurzweil, Ray.1999. The age of spiritual machines. Viking .
64.
Kuznick, Peter J.1994. Losing the world of tomorrow: The battle over the presentation of science at the 1939 New York World's Fair. American Quarterly46:341-73.
65.
Landon, B.2004. Less is more: Much less is much more: The insistent allure of nanotechnology narratives in science fiction literature. In Nanoculture: Implications of the new technoscience, edited by N. Katherine Hayles and Danielle Foushee , 131-46. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
66.
Lerner, Frederick Andrew.1985. Modern science fiction and the American literary community . Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press .
67.
Liebermann, Randy. 1992 . The “Collier's” and Disney series. In Blueprint for space: Science fiction to science fact, edited by Frederick I. Ordway III and Randy Liebermann, 135-46. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
68.
Longman, Phillip J., Janet Rae-Dupree, and Charles W. Petit .2000. The next big thing is small . US News & World Report, July 3.
69.
López, José.2004. Bridging the gaps: Science fiction in nanotechnology. Hyle10:129-52.
70.
Macoubrie, J.2005. Informed public perceptions of nanotechnology and trust in government. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
71.
Michael, Mike.1996. Ignoring science: Discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science. In Misunderstanding science?, edited by AlanIrwin and Brian Wynne, 116-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Miksanek, Tony.2001. Microscopic doctors and molecular black bags: Science fiction's prescription for nanotechnology and medicine. Literature and Medicine20:55-70.
73.
Milburn, Colin.2002. Nanotechnology in the age of posthuman engineering: Science fiction and science. Configurations10:261-95.
74.
Miller, Keith B.2006. The controversy over the Kansas science standards. http://www.wheaton.edu/ACG/essays/miller1.html (accessed March 4, 2006).
75.
Mody, Cyrus.2004. Small, but determined: Technological determinism in nanoscience . Hyle10:99-128.
Nagata, Linda.1995. Tech heaven. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
78.
Nanotechnology: Unlocking the smallest secrets. 2004. San Francisco Chronicle, February 1.
79.
Napier, Anthony.2003. Nanotechnology in science fiction. http://www.geocities.com/asnapier/nano/n-sf (accessed January 10, 2005).
80.
Pethokoukis, J.2003. Devil in the details? U.S. News & World Report, January 27.
81.
The philosopher prince. 2003. Ottawa Citizen , May 1.
82.
Phoenix, Chris, and K. Eric Drexler .2004. Safe exponential manufacturing . Nanotechnology15:869-72.
83.
Powell, Michael.2000. Are humans doomed? Washington Post, April 16.
84.
Preuss, Paul1985. Human error. New York: Tor.
85.
Raymo, Chet.2000. Building machines from the atoms up. Boston Globe, July 25.
86.
Russell, Eric Frank.2000. Hobbyist. In Major ingredients: The selected short stories of Eric Frank Russell, edited by Rick Katze, 183-205. Framingham, MA: NESFA Press.
87.
Rydell, Robert.1985. The fan dance of science: American world's fairs in the Great Depression. Isis76:525-42.
88.
Science fiction and fantasy: Old stories, new boundaries. 2002 . Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, October 27.
89.
Sprackland, George Robert.2006. A scientist tells why “Intelligent Design” is not science. Educational Digest, January.
90.
Stephenson, Neal.1995. The diamond age. New York: Bantam Books.
91.
Stix, Gary.2001. Little big science. Scientific American , September.
92.
Sturgeon, Theodore.1995. Microcosmic god. In Microcosmic God: The complete stories of Theodore Sturgeon, Vol. 2, edited by Paul Williams, 127-56. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
93.
Sweet, Doug.2001. Mix of intellectual horsepower and key industries could make city a hub on the continent in hot scientific field. Montreal Gazette, November 3.
94.
Swift, Jonathan.1726. Gulliver's Travels. London: B. Motte.
95.
Telotte, J.P.2005. Disney in science fiction land. Journal of Popular Film & Television, Spring.
96.
Themes: Nanotechnology. 2000. http://www.scifan.com/themes/themes.asp?TH_themeid=13 (accessed January 11, 2005).
97.
Thomas, Jim, and Kathy Jo Wetter .2003. Welcome to the nanostate . London Times, April 29.
98.
Thurs, Daniel Patrick.2007a. No longer academic: Models of commercialization and the construction of the nanotechnology industry. Science as Culture16:169-86.
99.
———. 2007b. Building the nano-world of tomorrow: Science fiction, the boundaries of nanotechnology, and managing depictions of the future. Extrapolation48:244-66.
100.
———. 2007c. Science talk: Changing notions of science in American culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
101.
Vergano, D.2004. Creating a monster? USA Today, September 28.
102.
Wells, H.G.1895. The time machine. London: W. Heinemann.
103.
White, James.1993. Interview. Locus, March. http://www.sectorgeneral.com/articleslocusinterview.html (accessed January 31, 2005).
104.
Winarski, T., and E. Stoker-Townsend .2005. Nanotechnology thriving on patents. Intellectual Property Today, April.
105.
Wright, John C.2002. The golden age. New York, NY: Tor .
