Gender stereotypes in the mass media perpetuate traditional views of women that may influence children's perceptions of women in science, engineering, and technology. This study used a randomized posttest-only control group design to determine the efficacy of media literacy training on middle school–aged children's perceptions of scientists. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: discussion, discussion plus viewing of television and film clips that featured images of women, or a control. A total of 304 seventh-grade students were asked to complete the Draw-A-Scientist Test and to write down the source of information for their drawings. Across conditions, boys were more likely than girls to draw male scientists, and girls were more likely than boys to draw female scientists. Boys also were more likely to depict other stereotypes of scientists. Media sources were listed as the primary source of information for the drawings.
American Association of University Women.1998. Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
2.
———. 2000. Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: AAUW Education Foundation.
3.
Austin, Erica Weintraub, Meng-Jinn Chen, and Joel W. Grube.2006. How does alcohol advertising influence underage drinking? The role of desirability, identification and skepticism . Journal of Adolescent Health38:376-84.
4.
Austin, Erica Weintraub, and Kristine Kay Johnson .1997. Immediate and delayed effects of media literacy training on third graders' decision making for alcohol. Health Communications9 (4): 323-49.
5.
Babbie, E.1992. The practice of social research. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Baker, Dale, and Rosemary Leary.1995. Letting girls speak out about science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching32 (1): 3-28.
7.
Baker-Sperry, Lori, and Liz Grauerholz.2003. The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children's fairy tales. Gender & Society15: 711-26.
8.
Bandura, Albert, Claudio Barbaranelli, Gian Vittorio , and Concetta Pastorelli.2001. Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development72 (1): 187-206.
9.
Barman, Charles R.1997. Students' views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 18-23.
10.
———. 1999. Completing the study: High school students' views of scientists and science. Science and Children, 16-21.
11.
Barner, Mark R.1999. Sex-role stereotyping in FCC-mandated children's educational television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (4): 551-64.
12.
Barton, Angela Calabrese, Toby J. Hindin, Isobel R. Contento, Michelle Trudeau , Kimberley Yang, Sumi Hagiwara, and Pamela D. Koch.2001. Underprivileged urban mothers' perspectives on science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching38 (6): 688-711.
13.
Bem, Sandra Lipsitz.1981. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing . Psychological Review88 (4): 354-64.
14.
———. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Bigler, Rebecca S., and Lynn S. Liben.1990. The role of attitudes and interventions in gender-schematic processing. Child Development61:1440-52.
16.
Bodzin, Alec, and Mike Gehringer.2001. Breaking science stereotypes. Science and Children38 (4): 36-41.
17.
Brown, Ann L.1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences2 (2): 141-78.
18.
Buck, Gayle A., and Diandra Leslie-Pelecky .2002. Bringing female scientists into the elementary classroom: Confronting the strength of elementary students' stereotypical images of scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education14 (2): 1-10.
19.
Buldu, Mehmet.2006. Young children's perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research48 (1): 121-32.
20.
Campbell, Anne, Louisa Shirley, and Julia Candy.2004. A longitudinal study of gender-related cognition and behaviour . Developmental Science7 (1): 1-9.
21.
Chambers, David Wade.1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education67 (2): 255-65.
22.
Cohen, J.1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 37-46.
23.
Coltrane, S., and M. Messineo.2000. The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990's television advertising. Sex Roles42 (5/6): 363-89.
24.
Davies, P.G., S.J. Spencer, andC.M. Steele.2005. Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88: 276-87.
25.
Dietz, T.L.1998. An examination of violence and gender role portrayals in video games: Implications for gender socialization and aggressive behavior . Sex Roles38 (5/6): 425-42.
26.
Durkin, Kevin, and Bradley Nugent.1998. Kindergarten children's gender-role expectations for television actors. Sex Roles38 (5/6): 387-402.
27.
Eccles, J.S., T.F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. Goff, B. Kaczala, C.M. Meece, and J. Midgley.1983. Expectancies, values and academic behaviors . In Achievement and Achievement Motives, edited by J. T. Spence. San Francisco: Freeman.
28.
Elasmar, Michael, Kazumi Hasegawa, and Mary Brain.1999. The portrayal of women in U.S. prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (1): 20-34.
29.
Erkut, Sumru, Fern Marx, Jacqueline P. Fields, and Rachel Sing.1999. Raising confident and competent girls: One size does not fit all. In Gender, culture and ethnicity: Current research about women and men, edited by L. A. Peplau , S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegas, and P. L. Taylor . Mountain View, CA: Mayfield .
30.
Faber, Ronald J., Jane D. Brown, and Jack M. McLeod.1979. Coming of age in the global village: Television and adolescence. In Children communicating: Media and development of thought, speech, understanding, edited by E. Wartella.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Finson, Kevin D., John B. Beaver, and Bonnie L. Cramond .1995. Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics95 (4): 195-205.
32.
Fort, Deborah C., and Heather L. Varney .1989. How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 8-13.
33.
Gonzales, Rachel, Deborah Glik, Mehrnaz Davoudi, and Alfonso Ang.2004. Media literacy and public health: Integrating theory, research, and practice for tobacco control. American Behavioral Scientist48 (2): 189-201.
34.
Griffin, R.J., S. Sen, and R. Plotkin.1994. Sex, schemata, and social status: TV characters identification and occupational aspirations among adolescents. In Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumptions in gender research, edited by L. H. Turner and H. M. Sterk.Westport, CT: Bergin Garvey.
35.
Gunter, Ramona, and Amy Stamach.2005. Differences in men and women scientists' perceptions of workplace climate. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering11 (1): 97-116.
36.
Hammrich, Penny L.1997. Yes, daughter, you can: Empowering parents is the first step toward improving females' achievement in science. Science and Children34 (4): 21-24.
37.
Handelsman, Jo, Nancy Cantor, Molly Carnes, Denice Denton, Eve Fine, Barbara Grosv, Virginia Hinshaw, Cora B. Marrett, Sue V. Rosser, Donna Shalala, and Jennifer Sheridan .2005. Enhanced: More women in science . Science309 (5738): 1190-91.
38.
Handley, Herbert M., and Linda W. Morse.1984. Two-year study relating adolescents' self-concept and gender role perceptions to achievement and attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching21 (6): 599-607.
39.
Hoerrner, Keisha L.1996. Sex roles in Disney films: Analyzing behaviors from Snow White to Simba. Women's Studies in Communication19 (2): 213-28.
40.
Huber, Richard A., and Grace M. Burton .1995. What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics95 (7): 371-76.
41.
Hughes, Farrah M., and Catherine E. Seta .2003. Gender stereotypes: Children's perceptions of future compensatory behavior following violations of gender roles. Sex Roles49 (11/12): 685-91.
42.
Irving, Lori M., and Susan R. Berel.2001. Comparison of media-literacy programs to strengthen college women's resistance to media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly25 (2): 103-11.
43.
Johnston, J., and J.S. Ettema.1982. Positive images: Breaking stereotypes with children's television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Jones, M. Gail, Ann Howe, and Melissa J. Rua.2000. Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education84:180-92.
45.
Kelly, Alison.1985. The construction of masculine science. British Journal of Sociology of Education6 (2): 133-54.
46.
Knight, Meredith Thompson, and Christine M. Cunningham .2004. Building a structure of support: An inside look at the structure of women in engineering programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering10: 1-20.
47.
Knight, Meredith, and Christine Cunningham .2004. Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering . Paper read at the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June.
48.
Lauzen, Martha M., and David M. Dozier .1999. Making a difference in prime time: Women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995-96 television season . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (1): 1-19.
49.
Lee, James Daniel.1998. Which kids can “become” scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly61 (3): 199-219.
50.
———. 2002. More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education75: 349-73.
51.
Levy, Gary D., and D. Bruce Carter .1989. Gender schema, gender constancy, and gender-role knowledge: The role of cognitive factors in preschoolers' gender-role stereotype attributions. Developmental Psychology25 (3): 444-49.
52.
Levy, Gary D., Adrienne L. Sadovsky, and Georgene L. Troseth .2000. Aspects of young children's perceptions of gender-typed occupations. Sex Roles42 (11/12): 993-1006.
53.
Liben, Lynn S., Rebecca S. Bigler, and Holleen R. Krogh .2001. Pink and blue collar jobs: Children's judgments of job status and job aspirations in relation to sex of worker. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology79: 346-63.
54.
———. 2002. Language at work: Children's gendered interpretations of occupational titles. Child Development73 (3): 810-28.
55.
Liben, Lynn S., and Margaret L. Signorella .1993. Gender-schematic processing in children: The role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology29 (1): 141-49.
56.
Lightbody, Pauline, and Alan Durndell.1996. The masculine image of careers in science and technology: Fact or fantasy?British Journal of Educational Psychology66: 231-46.
57.
Long, Marilee, Greg Boiarsky, and Greg Thayer.2001. Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: A content analysis. Public Understanding of Science10:255-69.
58.
Maoldomhnaigh, Micheal O., and A. Hunt.1988. Some factors affecting the image of the scientists drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education6 (2): 159-66.
59.
Mason, Cheryl L., Jane Butler Kahle, and April L. Gardner .1991. Draw-a-scientist test: Future implications. School Science and Mathematics91 (5): 193-98.
Matthews, Brian.1996. Drawing scientists. Gender and Education8 (2): 231-43.
62.
Mau, Wei-Cheng.2003. Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. The Career Development Quarterly51 (3): 234-43.
63.
Mead, Margaret, and Rhoda Metraux.1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science126: 384-90.
64.
Miller, Patricia H., Jennifer Slawinski Blessing, and Stephanie Schwartz .2006. Gender differences in high-school students' views about science. International Journal of Science Education28 (4): 363-81.
65.
Monhardt, Rebecca M.2003. The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education42 (3): 25-39.
66.
Morgan, Michael.1982. Television and adolescents' sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43 (5): 947-55.
67.
Nathanson, Amy I.2004. Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children's responses to violent television. Journal of Communication54 (2): 321-36.
68.
Nathanson, Amy I., Barbara J. Wilson, Jocelyn McGee, and Minu Sebastian.2002. Counteracting the effects of female stereotypes on television via active mediation. Journal of Communication52 (4): 922-37.
69.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.2007. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2007. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd. Accessed 8 May 2007.
70.
Nauta, Margaret M., and Douglas L. Epperson .2003. A longitudinal examination of the social-cognitive model applied to high school girls' choices of nontraditional college majors and aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology50 (4): 448-57.
71.
Newton, Lynn D., and Douglas P. Newton .1998. Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientist: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotypes? International Journal of Science Education20 (9): 1137-49.
72.
Nihlen, Ann Sigrid, and Becky A. Bailey .1988. Children's display of gender schemas through interaction with nontraditional workers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly19 (2): 155-62.
73.
Orenstein, P.1994. School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidencegap. New York: Doubleday.
74.
Papadimitriou, M.2004. What girls say about their science education experiences: Is anybody really listening? Victoria, British Columbia: Trafford.
75.
Parrott, Laurel, Linda Spatig, Patricia S. Kusimo , Carolyn C. Carter, and Marian Keyes .2000. Troubled waters: Where multiple streams of inequality converge in the math and science experiences of nonpriviliged girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering6: 45-71.
76.
Parsons, Eileen Carlton.1997. Black high school females' images of the scientist: Expression of culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching34 (7): 745-68.
77.
Pierce, K.1993. Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady? Sex Roles29 (1/2): 59-68.
78.
Potter, W. James.1998. Media literacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
Rosenthal, Dorothy B.1993. Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics93 (4): 212-16.
80.
Ruble, Diane R., and Charles Stangor.1986. Stalking the elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social-psychological analysis of gender schemas. Social Cognition4 (2): 227-61.
81.
Schank, R.C., and R.P. Abelson.1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
82.
Schnabel, Kai U., Corinne Alfeld, Jacquelynne Eccles , Olaf Koller, and Jurgen Baumert.2002. Parental influence on students' educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications—same effect?Journal of Vocational Behavior60:178-98.
83.
Schneider, David J.2004. The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.
84.
Scott, Anne B., and Brent Mallinckrodt. 2005. Parental emotional support, science self-efficacy, and choice of science major in undergraduate women. The Career Development Quarterly53: 263-73.
85.
Signorielli, Nancy.1997. A content analysis: Reflections of girls in the media. Report for Children Now and the Kaiser Family Foundation. Available from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/1260-gendr.cfm.
86.
Smith, Jessi L., Carol Sansone, and Paul White.2007. The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology99 (1): 99-114.
87.
Smith, Walter S., and Thomas Owen Erb .1986. Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents' attitudes toward scientists and women in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching23 (8): 667-76.
88.
Song, Jinwoong, and Kwang-Suk Kim.1999. How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education21 (9): 957-77.
89.
Steele, C.M., and J. Aronson.1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology69: 797-811.
90.
Steinke, Jocelyn.2004. Science in cyberspace: Science and engineering World Wide Web sites for girls. Public Understanding of Science13 (1): 7-30.
91.
———. 2005. Cultural representations of gender and science: Portrayals of female scientists and engineers in popular films. Science Communication27: 27-63.
92.
Steinke, Jocelyn, Maria Lapinski, Nikki Crocker, Aletta Zietsman-Thomas, Yaschica Williams, Stephanie Higdon, and Sarvani Kuchibhotla .2006. Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children's perceptions of women in science and engineering using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST). In Proceedings of 2006 WEPAN Conference, edited by B. Bogue and R. Marra. Available at http://www.x-cd.com/wepan06/index.html.
93.
Steinke, Jocelyn, Maria Lapinski, Aletta Zietsman-Thomas, Nikki Crocker, Yaschica Williams, Stephanie Higdon, and Sarvani Kuchibhotla .2006. Media influences and girls' perceptions of science and engineering. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science , St. Louis, MO, February.
94.
Steinke, Jocelyn, Maria Lapinski, Aletta Zietsman-Thomas, Paul Nwulu, Nikki Crocker, Yaschica Williams, Stephanie Higdon, and Sarvani Kuchibhotla .2006. Middle school-aged children's attitudes toward women in science, engineering, and technology and the effects of media literacy training. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering12: 295-323.
95.
Steinke, Jocelyn, and Marilee Long.1996. A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children's educational science programs. Science Communication18 (2): 91-115.
96.
Tenenbaum, Harriet R., and Campbell Leaper.2003. Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology39 (1): 34-47.
97.
Thomas, Jeff A., and Rosalina V. Hairston .2003. Adolescent students' images of an environmental scientist: An opportunity for constructivist teaching. ElectronicJournal of Science Education7 (4): 1-25.
98.
Tsapogas, John.2004. More than one-fifth of all individuals employed in science and engineering occupations have less than a bachelor's degree education. InfoBrief: Science Resources Statistics. Accessed 8 May 2007 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf04333/ .
99.
Turner-Bowker, Diane M.1996. Gender stereotyped descriptors in children's picture books: Does “Curious Jane” exist in the literature? Sex Roles35 (7/8): 461-88.
100.
Wade, Tracey D., Susan Davidson, and Jennifer A. O'Dea .2003. A preliminary controlled evaluation of a school-based media literacy program and self-esteem program for reducing eating disorder risk factors. International Journal of Eating Disorders33 (4): 371-83.
101.
Weisgram, Erica S., and Rebecca S. Bigler .2006. Girls and science careers: The role of altruistic values and attitudes about scientific tasks. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology27:326-48.
102.
White, K., and K.N. Kinnick.2000. One click forward and two clicks back: Portrayals of women using computers in television commercials. Women's Studies in Communication23 (3): 392-412.
