Drawing from framing theory, this study examines how describing the impact of climate change on polar bears with an episodic or thematic frame may affect predispositions for individual behavior change and support for policies to address climate change. The study finds that participants exposed to a thematic frame had more support for policies that address climate change than participants exposed to an episodic frame. There was no framing effect for predispositions for individual behavior change. Implications for communicating climate change to the general public are discussed.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Batson, C.D., Batson, J.G., Slingsby, J.K., Harrell, K.L., Peekna, H.M., & Todd, R.M. ( 1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5413-5426.
3.
Boykoff, M.T., & Boykoff, J.M. ( 2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190-1204.
4.
Brader, T. ( 2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Chris, C. ( 2006). Watching wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Druckman, J. ( 2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
7.
Dunlap, R.E. ( 2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3-18.
8.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. ( 1987). Empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119.
9.
Fischhoff, B. ( 2007). Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: Climate change. Environmental Science & Technology Online, 41, 7204-7208.
10.
Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
11.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heider, F. ( 1978). Über balance und attribution [About balance and attribution]. In D. Görlitz, W.-U. Meyer, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Bielefelder symposium über attribution (pp. 19-28). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
14.
Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., & Johnson, C. A. (Eds.). (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis (Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Iyengar, S. ( 1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12, 19-35.
16.
Iyengar, S. ( 1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Kogut, T., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2008). Who help more? How self-other discrepancies influence decisions in helping situations. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 595-606.
18.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. ( 2005a). The "identified victim" effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 157-167.
19.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. ( 2005b). The singularity of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 106-116.
20.
Maibach, E., & Priest, S.H. ( 2009). No more "business as usual": Addressing climate change through constructive engagement. Science Communication, 30, 299-304.
21.
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2008). Communication and marketing as climate change as climate change intervention assets: A public health perspective . American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 488-500.
22.
Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G., Crigler, A., & MacKuen, M. (Eds). (2007). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Nisbet, M.C. ( 2009a). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter to public engagement. Environment, 51, 12-23.
25.
Nisbet, M.C. ( 2009b). Framing science: A new paradigm in public engagement . In L. Kahlor & P. Stout (Eds.), Understanding science: New agendas in science communication (pp. 40-67). New York, NY : Taylor & Francis.
26.
Nisbet, M.C., & Kotcher, J. ( 2009). A two step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30, 328-354.
27.
Nisbet, M.C., & Mooney, C. ( 2007, April 6). Framing science. Science, 316, 56.
28.
Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement?Science Communication, 30, 305-327.
29.
Pierce, J.C., Lovrich, P.N.P., Jr. , Tsurutani, T., & Abe, T. (1987). Culture, politics, and mass public: Traditional and modern supporters of the new environmental paradigm in Japan and the United States. Journal of Politics, 49, 54-79.
30.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
31.
Scheufele, D.A. ( 2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
32.
Slovic, P. ( 2007). "If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 1-17.
33.
Small, D.A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 5-16.
34.
Small, D.A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. ( 2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143-153.
35.
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (Eds.). (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, J.W. ( 1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 181-191.
37.
Zaller, J.R. ( 1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
