Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-6
Expanding on Behavioral Outcomes in the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model: Socio-Cognitive Factors Predicting Information Seeking,Sharing,and Discussion
We employed the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model to identify socio-cognitive factors motivating hunters’ information seeking, sharing, and discussion of the risks of using lead ammunition for hunting. Values, risk perceptions, and informational insufficiency similarly predicted individual- and societal-level informational behavioral intentions. In contrast, knowledge and explicated informational subjective norms (descriptive, dynamic, and injunctive norms) differentially influenced them. Interestingly, there were discrepancies found between theoretical predictions of information sharing and self-reported willingness to share a risk communication video on lead ammunition for hunting, which offers insights about the utility value of the RISP model for practitioners.
AhnJ.KahlorL. A.NohG. Y. (2020). Outbreak! Socio-cognitive motivators of risk information sharing during the 2018 South Korean MERS-CoV epidemic. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 945–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1800065
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In AlbarracinD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
ArnettE. B.SouthwickR. (2015). Economic and social benefits of hunting in North America. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 72(5), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2015.1033944
5.
Balog-WayD. H. P.McComasK. A.LeongA. D.BrownD.SchulerK. L. (forthcoming). Towards an evidence-informed strategy for communicating lead ammunition risks. Wildlife Society Bulletin, XX(XX), XX–XX.
6.
BellingerD. C.BurgerJ.CadeT. J.Cory-SlechtaD. A.FinkelsteinM.HuH.KosnettM.LandriganP. J.LanphearB.PokrasM. A.RedigP. R.RideoutB. A.SilbergeldE.WrightR.SmithD. R. (2013). Health risks from lead-based ammunition in the environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(6), a178–a179. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306945
7.
BinderA. R.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD.GuntherA. C. (2011). Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility. Risk Analysis, 31(2), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01516.x
8.
BrinkerD. L.ZhouY.Acevedo CallejasM. L.MacGeorgeE. L. (2020). Increasing information seeking about antibiotic risks: Testing a clinical intervention message using the risk information seeking and processing model. Science Communication, 42(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020914610
9.
ChungN.NamK.KooC. (2016). Examining information sharing in social networking communities: Applying theories of social capital and attachment. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.005
10.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
11.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
12.
De GrootJ. I.StegL. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
GigoneD.HastieR. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959
16.
GriffinR. J.DunwoodyS.NeuwirthK. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), S230–S245. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
17.
GriffinR. J.NeuwirthK.DunwoodyS.GieseJ. (2004). Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology, 6(1), 23–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_2
18.
GriffinR. J.YangZ.BoernerF.BourassaS.DarrahT.KnurekS.OrtizS.DunwoodyS. (2005, August). Applying an information seeking and processing model to a study of communication about energy (Vol. 8) [Conference session]. Annual Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Antonio, TX, United States.
HeffelfingerJ. R.GeistV.WishartW. (2013). The role of hunting in North American wildlife conservation. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 70(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.800383
21.
HelfinsteinS. M.MumfordJ. A.PoldrackR. A. (2015). If all your friends jumped off a bridge: The effect of others’ actions on engagement in and recommendation of risky behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000043
22.
HwangY.JeongS. H. (2020). A channel-specific analysis of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model: The role of relevant channel beliefs and perceived information gathering capacity. Science Communication, 42(3), 279–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020926612
23.
KahlorL. A. (2007). An augmented risk information seeking model: The case of global warming. Media Psychology, 10(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532971
24.
KaltenbornB. P.AndersenO.LinnellJ. D. (2013). Predators, stewards, or sportsmen—How do Norwegian hunters perceive their role in carnivore management?International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 9(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2013.818060
25.
KimH. K.LaiC. H. (2020). Seeking and sharing information about transboundary air pollution in Singapore: Effects of own and others’ information insufficiency. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1597751
LarsonJ. R.Foster-FishmanP. G.KeysC. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446
28.
LiY.GuanM.HammondP.BerreyL. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: A content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research, 36(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
29.
LiaoW.YuanY. C.McComasK. A. (2018). Communal risk information sharing: Motivations behind voluntary information sharing for reducing interdependent risks in a community. Communication Research, 45(6), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626981
30.
LiuJ.RauP. L. P.WendlerN. (2015). Trust and online information-sharing in close relationships: A cross-cultural perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.937458
31.
LoschelderD. D.SiepelmeyerH.FischerD.RubelJ. A. (2019). Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, Article 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.002
32.
MortensenC. R.NeelR.CialdiniR. B.JaegerC. M.JacobsonR. P.RingelM. M. (2019). Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617734615
33.
ParkH. S.SmithS. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
34.
RitzerG.JurgensonN. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer.”Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
SchulzJ. H.StanisS. A. W.HallD. M.WebbE. B. (2021). Until it’s a regulation it’s not my fight: Complexities of a voluntary nonlead hunting ammunition program. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, Article 111438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111438
37.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
38.
SuttonJ.VeilS. R. (2017). Risk communication and social media. In KaspersonR. E. (Ed.), Risk conundrums: Solving unsolvable problems (pp. 96–111). Routledge.
39.
TomaC.ButeraF. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333176
WangW.KahlorL. A.MoonW. K.OlsonH. C. (2021). Person, place, or thing: Individual, community, and risk information seeking. Science Communication, 43(3), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020986805
42.
WhiteK. M.SmithJ. R.TerryD. J.GreensladeJ. H.McKimmieB. M. (2009). Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X295207
43.
YangZ. J. (2012). Too scared or too capable? Why do college students stay away from the H1N1 vaccine?Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(10), 1703–1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01799.x
44.
YangZ. J.AloeA. M.FeeleyT. H. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12071
45.
YangZ. J.KahlorL. (2013). What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication, 35(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873
46.
YangZ. J.KahlorL. A.GriffinD. J. (2014). I share, therefore I am: A U.S.−China comparison of college students’ motivations to share information about climate change. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12018
47.
YangZ. J.McComasK. A.GayG.LeonardJ. P.DannenbergA. J.DillonH. (2010). Motivation for health information seeking and processing about clinical trial enrollment. Health Communication, 25(5), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.483338
48.
YangZ. J.ZhuangJ. (2020). Information seeking and information sharing related to Hurricane Harvey. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1054–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019887675
49.
ZouX.SavaniK. (2019). Descriptive norms for me, injunctive norms for you: Using norms to explain the risk gap. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(6), 644–648.
