Although most real building structure controllers are in the form of proportional-derivative/proportional-integral-derivative (PD/PID), there have been few published theory results of PD/PID on structural vibration control. In order to minimize the regulation error, a PD/PID control needs relatively large derivative and integral gains. These deteriorate the transient performances of the vibration control. In this paper, a natural combination of industrial PD/PID control with fuzzy compensation is proposed. The main contribution of this paper is that the stability of the fuzzy PD/PID control is proven with standard weight training algorithms. These conditions give explicit selection methods for the gains of the PD/PID control. Experimental studies on a two-story building prototype with the controllers are addressed. The experimental results validate our theoretical analysis.
AlavinasabAMoharramiH (2006) Active control of structures using energy-based LQR method. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering21: 605–611.
2.
ÅströmKJHägglundT (2004) Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control. Journal of Process Control14: 635–650.
3.
ChangJCHSoongTT (1980) Structural control using active tuned mass damper. Journal of Engineering Mechanics106: 1091–1098.
4.
ChenPCChenCWChiangWL (2011) Linear matrix inequality conditions of nonlinear systems by genetic algorithm-based H∞ adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller. Journal of Vibration and Control17: 163–173.
5.
ChopraAK (2001) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
6.
CybenkoG (1989) Approximation by superposition of sigmoidal activation function. Mathematics of Control Signals and Systems2: 303–314.
7.
DattaTK (2003) A state-of-the-art review on active control of structures. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology40: 1–17.
8.
DuHZhangN (2008) H∞ control for buildings with time delay in control via linear matrix inequalities and genetic algorithms. Engineering Structures30: 81–92.
9.
GucluR (2006) Sliding mode and PID control of a structural system against earthquake. Mathematical and Computer Modelling41: 210–217.
10.
GucluRYaziciH (2008) Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers. Journal of Sound and Vibration318: 36–49.
11.
HoCCMaCK (2007) Active vibration control of structural systems by a combination of the linear quadratic Gaussian and input estimation approaches. Journal of Sound and Vibration301: 429–449.
12.
HousnerGBergmanLCaugheyT (1997) Structural control: past, present and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics123: 897–974.
13.
KellyR (1995) A tuning procedure for stable PID control of robot manipulators. Robotica13: 141–148.
14.
KhotSMYelveNPTomarR (2012) Active vibration control of cantilever beam by using PID based output feedback controller. Journal of Vibration and Control18: 366–372.
15.
KimDH (2009) Neuro-control of fixed offshore structures under earthquake. Engineering Structures31: 517–522.
16.
KimJJungHLeeI (2000) Optimal structural control using neural networks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics126: 201–205.
17.
LewisFLDawsonDMAbdallahCT (2004) Robot Manipulator Control: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
18.
MamdaniEH (1974) Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. IEEE Proceedings121: 1585–1588.
19.
Nerves AC and Krishnan R (1995) Active control strategies for tall civil structures. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, vol. 2, 6-10 November 1995, Olando, FL, USA, pp. 962–967.
20.
ParkKSKohHM (2004) Preference-based optimum design of an integrated structural control system using genetic algorithms. Advances in Engineering Software35: 85–94.
21.
ParkKSKohHMSeoCW (2004) Independent modal space fuzzy control of earthquake-excited structures. Engineering Structures26: 279–289.
22.
ParkWParkKSKohHM (2008) Active control of large structures using a bilinear pole-shifting transform with H∞ control method. Engineering Structures30: 3336–3344.
23.
Saragih R (2010) Designing active vibration control with minimum order for flexible structures. In: IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 9-11 June 2010, Xiamen, China, pp. 450–453.
24.
Seto K (1996) A structural control method of the vibration of flexible buildings in response to large earthquake and strong winds. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1, 11–13 December 1996, Kobe, Japan, pp. 658–663.
25.
SontagEDWangY (1995) On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property. Systems & Control Letters24: 351–359.
26.
SpencerBFSainMK (1997) Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback. IEEE Control Systems Magazine on Emerging Technology17: 19–35.
27.
SymansMDConstantinouMC (1999) Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures21: 469–487.
28.
ThenozhiSYuWGarridoR (2013) A novel numerical integrator for velocity and position estimation. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control34: 824–833.
29.
WangLX (1994) Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control: Design and Stability Analysis, New Jersey: PTR Prentice Hall.
30.
WenJK (1976) Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE)102: 249–263.
31.
YakutOAlliH (2011) Neural based sliding-mode control with moving sliding surface for the seismic isolation of structures. Journal of Vibration and Control17: 2103–2116.
32.
YuWMorenoMARodriguezFO (2011) Stable adaptive compensation with fuzzy CMAC for an overhead crane. Information Sciences181: 4895–4907.
