This study examines personality traits and motivations in association with individuals’ online news comment behavior. A survey of 517 participants indicated that those who were more agreeable and narcissistic were motivated for posting comments on online news. Motivations including informing, getting feedback, and exhibitionism predicted the frequency of posting on news comment sections, while social connection was a major predictor of commenting on the news shared in social media. Implications for using this online opinion-posting mechanism are discussed.
Amichai-HamburgerY.WainpelG.FoxS. (2002). On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert: Extraversion, introversion, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128.
2.
ArmstrongC. L.McAdamsM. J. (2011). Blogging the time away? Young adults’ motivations for blog use. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19, 113-128.
3.
ArmstrongJ.ZunigaM. M. (2006). Crashing the gate: Netroots, grassroots and the rise of people-powered politics. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
4.
AtkinD.JeffresL.NeuendorfK.LangeR.SkalskiP. (2005). Why they chat: Audience adoption and use of online media. In SalwenM.GarrisonB.DriscollP. (Eds.), Online news and the public (pp. 303-322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BlumlerJ. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6, 9-36.
6.
ButtS.PhillipsJ. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 346-360.
7.
CorreaT.HinsleyA.de ZunigaH. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.
8.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
9.
DouaiA.NofalH. (2012). Commenting in the online Arab public sphere: Debating the Swiss Minaret Ban and the “Ground Zero Mosque” online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 266-282.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
12.
ErjavecK.KovačičM. P. (2012). “You don’t understand, this is a new war!” Analysis of hate speech in news websites’ comments. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 899-920.
13.
FinnS. (1997). Origins of media exposure: Linking personality traits to TV, radio, print, and film use. Communication Research, 24, 507-529.
14.
FreudS. (1957). On narcissism: An introduction. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 73-102). London, England: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1914)
15.
GalaunerM.PetteyG.BeattyM.RuddJ.AtkinD. (2011). Using personality traits to examine television use: Combining uses and gratifications with Eysenck’s big three. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 27(1), 1-13.
16.
GarnhamN. (1992). The media and the public sphere. In CalhounC. (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 359-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GrahamL. T.GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality profiles associated with different motivations for playing World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 189-193.
19.
GuthS.ThomasM. (2010). Telecollaboration with Web 2.0 tools. In GuthS.HelmF. (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 39-68). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
20.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HollenbaughE. E. (2011). Motives for maintaining personal journal blogs. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 13-20.
22.
HuntD. S.AtkinD.KrishnanA. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 187-202.
23.
HuntD. S.LangstedtE. (2014). The influence of personality on digital photo sharing. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 3(2), 42-64.
24.
International Personality Item Pool. (2010). International Personality Item Pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved from http://ipip.ori.org/newBigFive5broadKey.htm
25.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509-523.
26.
KatzE.GurevitchM.HaasH. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181.
27.
KieslerS.ZubrowD.MosesA. M.GellerV. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
28.
KrishnanA.AtkinD. (2014). Individual differences in social networking site users: The interplay between antecedents and consequential effect on level of activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 111-118.
29.
LeungL. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 997-1006.
30.
LinC. A.SalwenM. B.AbdullaR. A. (2005). Uses and gratifications of online and offline news: New wine in an old bottle? In SalwenM. B.GarrsionB.DriscollP. D. (Eds.), Online news and the public (pp. 221-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
LokeJ. (2013). Readers’ debate a local murder trial: “Race” in the online public sphere. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6, 179-200.
32.
McCluskeyM.HmielowskiJ. (2011). Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letter to the editor. Journalism, 13, 303-319.
33.
McCombsM. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The news media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
34.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. Guilford Press.
35.
McCraeR. R.JohnO. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
36.
MouY.FuH.AtkinD. (2011). Predicting political discussion in a censored virtual environment. Political Communication, 28, 341-356.
37.
MouY.WuK.AtkinD. (2014). Understanding the use of circumvention tools to bypass online censorship. New Media & Society, 16, 1-20.
38.
MulyanegaraR. C.TsarenkoY.AndersonA. (2009). The Big Five and brand personality: Investigating the impact of consumer personality on preferences towards particular brand personality. Journal of Brand Management, 16, 234-247.
39.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
NormanW. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
41.
PalfreyJ.GasserU. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
42.
PapacharissiZ.RubinM. A. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
PornsakulvanichV.HaridakisP.RubinA. M. (2008). The influence of dispositions and Internet motivation on online communication satisfaction and relationship closeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2292-2310.
Quan-HaaseA.YoungA. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 350-361.
47.
RaskinR. N.HallC. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
48.
RaskinR. N.TerryH. (1988). A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
49.
RasmussenT. (2013). Internet-based media, Europe and the political public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 97-104.
50.
ReaderB. (2012). Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of “civility” in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 495-513.
51.
RosengrenK. E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: A paradigm outlined. In BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 269-286). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
52.
RossC.OrrE. S.SisicM.ArseneaultJ. M.SimmeringM. G.OrrR. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586.
53.
RubinA. M. (1981). An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 8, 141-165.
54.
RubinA. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advanced in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 165-184). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
SproullL.KieslerS. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
56.
SundarS. S.LimperosA. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for a new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504-525.
57.
VrocharidouA.EfthymiouI. (2012). Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and University students’ gratifications. Computers & Education, 58, 609-616.
58.
WaltherJ. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443-479). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
59.
WangY.LinH.LiaoY. (2012). Investigating the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment in students’ use of blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 139-152.
60.
WeiserE. B. (2015). #Me: Narcissism and its facets as predictors of selfie-posting frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 477-481.
