This autoethnographic narrative describes the equivocal process of identifying the source of physical discomfort, navigating interaction with health care institutions, and contemplating treatment. The author’s is a postmodern condition with multiple “truths” in a liminal position.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.
2.
AultA. (1996). Ambiguous identity in an unambiguous sex/gender structure. Sociological Quarterly, 37(3), 449-463.
3.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BudgeonS. (2003). Identity as embodied event. Body and Society, 9(1), 35-55.
5.
CloughP. T. (2003). Affect and control: Rethinking the body “beyond sex and gender.”Feminist Theory, 4(3), 359-364.
6.
CookJ. A.FonowM. (1986). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56(1), 2-29.
7.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
8.
EllisC.FlahertyM. G. (Eds.). (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
9.
GavaruzziT.LottoL.RumiatiR.FagerlinA. (2011). What makes a tumor diagnosis a call to action? On the preference for action versus inaction. Medical Decision Making, 31(2), 237-244.
10.
HandyC. (1990). The age of unreason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
HarrisonB. (2002). Seeing health and illness worlds—using visual methodologies in sociology of health and illness: A methodological review. Sociology of Health & Illness, 24(6), 856-872.
12.
HemonA. (2011, June13). (Personal History) The aquarium: A child’s isolating illness. The New Yorker, p. 20.
13.
IgnatowG. (2007). Theories of embodied knowledge: New directions for cultural and cognitive sociology?Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 37(2), 115-135.
14.
LewisP. L. (2011). Storytelling as research/research as storytelling. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 505-510.
MonaghanL. F. (2006). Corporeal indeterminacy: The value of embodied, interpretive sociology. In WatskullD. D.VanniniP. (Eds.), Body/embodiment: Symbolic interaction and the sociology of the body (pp. 125-140), Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
17.
RichardsonL. (2003). Writing: A method of inquiry. In LincolnY.DenzinN. (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 379-395).Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
18.
RobertsonM.MoirJ.SkeltonJ.DowellJ.CowanS. (2011). When the business of sharing treatment decisions is not the same as shared decision making: A discourse analysis of decision sharing in general practice. Health: An interdisciplinary journal for the social study of health, illness and medicine, 15(1), 78-95. doi: 10.1177/1363459309360788
19.
ShillingC. (2007). Sociology and the body: Classical traditions and new agendas. Sociological Review, 55(1), 1-18.
20.
SmithD. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
21.
WitzA. (2000). Whose body matters? Feminist sociology and the corporeal turn in sociology and feminism. Body & Society, 6(2), 1-24.
