This article is the fruit of a written dialogue between a sociocultural psychologist and a philosopher invested in the study of the Creative Real, in a context that resonates with process philosophy and posthumanism. Each of the two authors come from a different tradition (or, rather, different traditions) to the topic of posthuman creativity and their approaches overlap considerably but include as well important points of difference, ranging from writing style to key concepts and areas of application.
AbrahamA. (2019). The neuropsychology of creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 71–76.
2.
AndrewsG. J.DuffC. (2020). “Whole Onflow,” The productive event: An articulation through health. Social Science & Medicine, 265, Article 113498.
3.
BakhtinM. (1975). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Duke University Press.
5.
BarronF. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Hampton Press.
6.
BarronF. (1999). All creation is a collaboration. In MontuoriA.PurserR. (Eds.), Social creativity (vol. I, pp. 49–59). Hampton Press.
7.
BarronF.HarringtonD. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439–476.
8.
BatesonG. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
9.
BergsonH. (2007). The creative mind (AndisonM., Trans.). Dover.
10.
BoltanskiL.ChiapelloE. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (ElliottG., Trans). Verso.
11.
BraidottiR. (2010). The politics of “life itself” and new ways of dying. In CooleD.FrostS. (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 201–220). Duke University Press.
12.
BrinkmannS. (2007). Could interviews be epistemic? An alternative to qualitative opinion polling. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1116–1138.
13.
BrowningD.MyersW. T. (Eds.). (1998). Philosophers of process. Fordham University Press.
14.
BurnardP. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford University Press.
15.
Castro-GómezS. (2017). “¿Qué hacer con los universalismos occidentales? Observaciones en torno al ‘giro decolonial.’”Revista Analecta Política, 13(7), 249–272.
16.
ClarkA. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
17.
CooleD.FrostS. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press.
18.
CropleyD. H.KaufmanJ. C.CropleyA. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.
19.
De BruinL. R.HarrisA. (2017). Fostering creative ecologies in Australasian secondary schools. The Australasian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(9), 23–43.
20.
De FontenayE. (1981). Diderot ou le Matérialisme Enchanté. Grasset.
21.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Bergsonism (TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.). Zone Books.
22.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
23.
de MirandaL. (2008). Paridaiza. Plon. [English translation 2020 by Snuggly Books, 2020].
24.
de MirandaL. (2017). On the concept of creal: The politico-ethical horizon of a creative absolute. In de AssisP.GiudiciP. (Eds.), The dark precursor: Deleuze and artistic research (pp. 510–516). Leuven University Press.
25.
de MirandaL. (2019). Being and Neonness. MIT Press.
26.
de MirandaL. (2020a). Ensemblance: The transnational genealogy of Esprit de Corps. Edinburgh University Press.
27.
de MirandaL. (2020b). Artificial intelligence and philosophical creativity: From analytics to crealectics. Human Affairs, 30(4), 597–607.
28.
de MirandaL. (2021). Five principles of philosophical health: From Hadot to Crealectics. Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 5(1), 70–89.
29.
de NervalG. (1957). Selected writings. Grove Press.
30.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. Penguin.
31.
FreireP. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
32.
GastonS. (2013). The concept of World from Kant to Derrida. Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
GattariF. (2014). The three ecologies (PindarI.SuttonP., Trans.). Bloomsbury.
34.
GlăveanuV. P. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revisiting habit, reconceptualising creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78–92.
35.
GlăveanuV. P. (2013). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.
36.
GlăveanuV. P. (2015). From individual to co-agency. In GruberC. W.ClarkM. G.Hroar KlempeS.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Constraints of agency: Explorations of theory in everyday life (pp. 245–266). Springer.
37.
GlăveanuV. P. (2020a). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 335–354.
38.
GlăveanuV. P. (2020b). The possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press.
39.
GlăveanuV. P.ClappE. (2018). Distributed and participatory creativity as a form of cultural empowerment: The role of alterity, difference and collaboration. In BrancoA. U.Lopes-de-OliveiraM. C. (Eds.), Alterity, values and socialization: Human development within educational contexts (pp. 51–63). Springer.
40.
GlăveanuV. P.LubartT. (2014). Decentring the creative self: How others make creativity possible in creative professional fields. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 29–43.
41.
GuattariF. (1984). Transversality (SheedR., Trans.). In GuattariF. (Ed.), Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics (pp. 11–23). Penguin.
42.
HarrisA. (2016). Creativity and education. Palgrave.
43.
HegelG. W. F. (1956). The philosophy of history. Dover.
44.
HeideggerM. (1995). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics (McNeillW.WalkerN., Trans.). Indiana University Press.
45.
HeideggerM. (1996). Being and time (StambaughJ., Trans.). State University of New York Press.
46.
HusserlE. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
47.
IngoldT. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
48.
JovchelovitchS. (1996). In defence of representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(2), 121–135.
KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P. (2020). Making the CASE for shadow creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000313.
51.
KristevaJ. (2011). This incredible need to believe (Bie BrahicB., Trans.). Columbia University Press.
52.
LacanJ. (1991). L’envers de la psychanalyse: Le Séminaire, Livre XVII. Seuil [Translated into Russel Grigg as (2008) The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. WW Norton & Co.]
53.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
54.
MalabouC. (1996). L’Avenir de Hegel: Plasticité, Temporalité, Dialectique. Vrin [Translated into English by Lisabeth During as (2004) The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. Routledge].
55.
MayR. (1959). The nature of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 16(3), 261–276.
56.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
57.
MontuoriA.PurserR. E. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–112.
58.
MotenF. (2013). Blackness and nothingness (mysticism in the flesh). The South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(4), 737–780.
59.
NadeauM. (1989). The history of surrealism (HowardR., Trans.). Harvard University Press.
60.
NancyJ.-L. (1996). The muses (KamufP., Trans.). Stanford University Press.
61.
NegusK.PickeringM. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. SAGE.
62.
NietzscheF. (1966). Beyond good and evil (KaufmannW., Trans.). Vintage Books.
63.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V.RioP. D.AlvarezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press.
64.
ValsinerJ.RosaA. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge University Press.
