This study examined whether criminogenic risk, domestic violence risk, and mental health diagnoses would predict probation revocation among batterers in a felony domestic violence court (FDVC). Review of probation files included baseline assessments and probation disposition for FDVC probationers from January 2014 to March 2018 (n = 64). Results of the binary logistic regression analysis showed that criminogenic risk was a significant predictor of FDVC probation revocation. Interventions to prevent unsuccessful completion of domestic violence courts may benefit from programming that addresses early engagement in treatment, antisocial thinking patterns, and treatment for substance use disorders.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52.
5.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonK. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142.
6.
BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.BasileK. C.WaltersM. L.ChenJ.MerrickM. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(8), 1–18.
7.
BremM. J.FlorimbioA. R.ElmquistJ.ShoreyR. C.StuartG. L. (2018). Antisocial traits, distress tolerance, and alcohol problems as predictors of intimate partner violence in men arrested for domestic violence. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000088
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD. W.GlassN. (2009). The Danger Assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 653–674.
10.
CatalanoS. (2013). Intimate partner violence: Attributes of victimization, 1993–2011. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005275088
12.
CissnerA. B.LabriolaM.RempelM. (2013). Testing the effects of New York’s domestic violence courts. Center for Court Innovation: A Project of the Fund for the City of New York.
13.
CissnerA. B.LabriolaM.RempelM. (2015). Domestic violence courts: A multisite test of whether and how they change offender outcomes. Violence Against Women, 21(9), 1102–1122.
14.
CroweA. H.SydneyL.DeMicheleM.KeilitzS.NealC.FrohmanS., et al. (2009). Community corrections response to domestic violence: Guidelines for practice. American Probation and Parole Association.
15.
GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A.BennettL. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(1), 63–74.
16.
GrannM.WedinI. (2002). Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8(1), 5–23.
17.
GutierrezL.BlaisJ.BourgonG. (2016). Do domestic violence courts work? A meta-analytic review examining treatment and study quality. Justice Research and Policy, 17(2), 75–99.
18.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders: Risk, need, and responsivity. Public Safety.
19.
HansonR. K.Wallace-CaprettaS. M. (2000). Predicting recidivism among male batterers. Solicitor General Canada.
20.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8–25.
21.
HiltonN. Z.GrantT. H.RiceM. E.HoughtonR. E.EkeA. W. (2008). An in depth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 150–163.
22.
HiltonN. Z.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LangC.CormierC. A.LinesK. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 267–275.
23.
HiltonN. Z.RadatzD. L. (2018). The criminogenic and noncriminogenic treatment needs of intimate partner violence offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 6(11), 3247–3259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17740015
24.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.BatesL.SmutzlerN.SandinE. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence. Part I: Marital violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65–99.
25.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.StuartG. L. (1994). Typologies of male batters: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–479.
26.
HussM. R.CovellC. N.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2006). Clinical implications for the assessment and treatment of antisocial and psychopathic domestic violence perpetrators. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 13(1), 59–85.
27.
JonesA. S.GondolfE. W. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for reassault among batterer program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16(4), 345–359.
28.
JuodisM.StarzomskiA.PorterS.WoodworthM. (2014). What can be done about high-risk perpetrators of domestic violence?Journal of Family Violence, 29(4), 381–390.
29.
KraanenF. L.ScholingA.EmmelkampP. M. G. (2010). Substance use disorders in perpetrators of intimate partner violence in a forensic setting. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(3), 430–440.
30.
LabriolaM.’BradleyS. O.SullivanC.RempelM.MooreS. (2009). A national portrait of domestic violence courts. Center for Court Innovation.
31.
LagdonS.ArmourC.StringerM. (2014). Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisation: A systematic review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.24794
LovinsB. K.LatessaE. J.MayT.LuxJ. (2018). Validating the Ohio Risk Assessment System community supervision tool with a diverse sample in Texas. Corrections, 3(3), 186–202.
34.
LowenkampC. T.HolsingerA. M.LatessaE. J. (2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(5), 543–563.
35.
LowenkampC. T.PealerJ.SmithP.LatessaE. J. (2006). Adhering to the risk and needs principles: Does it matter for supervision-based programs?Federal Probation, 70(3), 3–8.
36.
MaiuroR. D.EberleJ. A. (2008). State standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment: Current status, trends, and recommendations. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 133–155.
37.
MauricioA. M.TeinJ. Y.LopezF. G. (2007). Borderline and antisocial personality scores as mediators between attachment and intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 22(2), 139–157.
38.
MessingJ.ThallerJ. (2013). The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1537–1558.
39.
Pico-AlfonsoM. A.Garcia-LinaresM. I.Celda-NavarroN.Blasco-RosC.EcheburúaE.MartinezM. (2006). The impact of physical, psychological, and sexual intimate male partner violence on women’s mental health: Depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, state anxiety, and suicide. Journal of Women’s Health, 15(5), 599–611.
40.
PittsW. J.GivensE.McNeeleyS. (2009). The need for a holistic approach to specialized domestic violence court programming: Evaluating offender rehabilitation needs and recidivism. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 60(3), 1–21.
41.
RivaraF. P.AndersonM. L.FishmanP.BonomiA. E.ReidR. J.CarrellD.ThompsonR. S. (2007). Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(2), 89–96.
42.
RoehlJ.O’SullivanC.WebsterD.CampbellJ. (2005). Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study: The RAVE study practitioner summary and recommendations. National Institute of Justice.
StewartL. A.GaboraN.KroppP. R.LeeZ. (2014). Effectiveness of risk-needs-responsivity-based family violence programs with male offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 29(2), 151–164.
45.
StuartG. L.MooreT. M.KahlerC. W.RamseyS. E. (2003). Substance abuse and relationship violence among men court-referred to batterer intervention programs. Substance Abuse, 24(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080902961385
46.
StuartG. L.O’FarrellT. J.TempleJ. R. (2009). Review of the association between treatment for substance misuse and reductions in intimate partner violence. Substance Use & Misuse, 44(9–10), 1298–1317.
47.
TuttyL. M.Babins-WagnerR. (2019). Outcomes and recidivism in mandated batterer intervention before and after introducing a specialized domestic violence court. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 1039–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516647005
WalterM.WiesbeckG. A.DittmannV.GrafM. (2011). Criminal recidivism in offenders with personality disorders and substance use disorders over 8 years of time at risk. Psychiatry Research, 186(2–3), 443–445.
