Young adult females face alarming rates of sexual victimization, with a growing concern about cybersexual harassment in the digital age (prevalence ranging from 4.6% to 70% in university female students), depending on sexual harassment parameters evaluated, different methodologies used, or sample characteristics. However, no studies so far assessed the cybersexual harassment from professor to their students. Thus, we developed and validated the Cyber Sexual Harassment Scale-Professor Student (CSHS-PS) to assess virtual sexual harassment by professors towards their students. A sample of 1,249 participants aged 18–40 was used for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The CSHS-PS demonstrated a two-factor structure, capturing “Unwanted Interaction” and “Sharing with Others.” Reliability and validity were confirmed, showing promise for assessing online sexual harassment in academia. This scale contributes to understanding and addressing this prevalent issue, especially among younger women, in educational settings, providing a valuable tool for research and practice.
AlmanasrehE.MolesR.ChenT. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
3.
ArafaA. E.ElbahraweR. S.SaberN. M.AhmedS. S.AbbasA. M. (2017). Cyber sexual harassment: A cross-sectional survey over female university students in Upper Egypt. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 5(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20175763
4.
BermúdezU. F. M. (2014). “Aquí los maestros ya no pegan porque ya no se acostumbra”. Expresiones de la violencia hacia las mujeres en la Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. Península, 9(2), 15–40.
5.
BuchananN.MahoneyA. (2022). Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.v27.1
6.
Castaño-CastrillónJ.GonzálezE.GuzmánJ.MontoyaJ.MurilloJ.Páez-CalaM.ParraL.SalazarT.VelásquezY. (2010). Acoso sexual en la comunidad estudiantil de la universidad de Manizales (Colombia) 2008. Estudio de corte transversal. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 61(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.303
7.
ChowdhuryR.FilebornB. (2020). “Break the Silence Bangladesh”: Examining “everyday” experiences of sexual violence through online activism. Women's Studies International Forum, 81, 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102379
8.
Cuenca-PiquerasC.Fernández-PradosJ. S.González-MorenoM. J. (2020). Face-to-face versus online harassment of European women: Importance of date and place of birth. Sexuality & Culture, 24, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09632-4
9.
EllerA. (2016). Transactional sex and sexual harassment between professors and students at an urban university in Benin. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(7), 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1123295
10.
FitzgeraldL. F.ShullmanS. L.BaileyN.RichardsM.SweckerJ.GoldY.OrmerodM.WeitzmanL. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90012-7
11.
Gonzalez-FerrerJ.Vallejo-MedinaP.MontesanoA.Guillén-RiquelmeA.Pineda-MarínC. (2025). Adaptation and validation of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire in Colombian female undergraduate students. (Manuscript under review).
12.
HallwaysH. (2001). Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Report. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation, 51.
13.
HenryN.PowellA. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
14.
International Test Commission (ITC). (2016). The international test commission guidelines on the security of tests, examinations, and other assessments: International test commission (ITC). International Journal of Testing, 16(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1111221
15.
JourilesE. N.NguyenJ.KraussA.StokesS. L.McDonaldR. (2022). Prevalence of sexual victimization among female and male college students: A methodological note with data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(11-12), NP8767–NP8792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978198
16.
JudA.GrafeB.MeshkovaK.KavemannB.MeysenT.HoffmannU.ZiegenhainU.FegertJ. (2023). Prevalence and predictors of affirmations of intimate partner violence in Germany: A first nationwide study on victimization in women and men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(1-2), NP1473–NP1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221092066
17.
LiM. N.ZhouX.CaoW.TangK. (2023). Sexual assault and harassment (SAH) victimization disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual Chinese youth. Journal of Social Issues, 79(4), 1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12511
18.
LinharesY.FontanaJ.LaurentiC. (2021). Protocols for preventing and tackling sexual violence in the university context: An analysis of the Latin American scenario. Saude e Sociedade, 30, e200180. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021200180
19.
MadiganS.LyA.RashC. L.Van OuytselJ.TempleJ. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314
20.
MorenoC. L.OsorioL. S.SepúlvedaL. E. (2007). Violencia sexual contra las estudiantes de la Universidad de Caldas (Colombia): Estudio de corte transversal. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 58(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.473
21.
Muñoz-FernándezN.Sánchez-JiménezV.Rodríguez-deArribaM. L.Nacimiento-RodríguezL.ElipeP.Del ReyR. (2023). Traditional and cyber dating violence among adolescents: Profiles, prevalence, and short-term associations with peer violence. Aggressive Behavior, 49(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22069
22.
PedersenW.BakkenA.StefansenK.von SoestT. (2023). Sexual victimization in the digital age: A population-based study of physical and image-based sexual abuse among adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02200-8
23.
PowellA.HenryN. (2016). Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3637–3665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516672055
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
26.
ReddyM. K.MurdochM. (2010). Sex differences in the factor structure of a modified Sexual Experiences Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 107(3), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.08.16.PR0.107.6.773-783
27.
ReedE.WongA.RajA. (2020). Cyber sexual harassment: A summary of current measures and implications for future research. Violence Against Women, 26(12-13), 1727–1740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219880959
RingroseJ.MilneB.MishnaF.RegehrK.SlaneA. (2022a, July). Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence. Women's Studies International Forum, 93, 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615
30.
RingroseJ.RegehrK.WhiteheadS. (2022b). Wanna trade?’: Cisheteronormative homosocial masculinity and the normalization of abuse in youth digital sexual image exchange. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1947206
31.
RitterB. A. (2014). Deviant behavior in computer-mediated communication: Development and validation of a measure of cybersexual harassment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12039
32.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
33.
SalazarM.RajA.SilvermanJ. G.RuschM. L. A.ReedE. (2023). Cyber sexual harassment among adolescent girls: A qualitative analysis. Adolescents, 3(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents3010007
34.
SaldarriagaL.RochaC.CastroD.Jiménez-MoyaG.CarvachoH.BohnerG. (2021). Sexual violence victimization among undergraduates at a Chilean university. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3776
35.
ScarduzioJ. A.SheffS. E.SmithM. (2018). Coping and sexual harassment: How victims cope across multiple settings. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1065-7
SchusterI.KrahéB.IlabacaB. P.Muñoz-ReyesJ. A. (2016). Sexual aggression victimization and perpetration among male and female college students in Chile. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1354. https://doi.org/https://www.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01354
38.
SmitD.Du PlessisV. (2011). Sexual harassment in the education sector. Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 14, 172–217.
39.
WheelerB. (2022). Sexual harassment in the digital world: Developing and validating a new measure of cyber-sexual harassment [Doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University.
40.
WHO. (2024). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
