Comparative urban political research offers scholars the opportunity to develop theory and to compare practice, yet there is a need for more conscious attention to the comparative method and the special opportunities and challenges involved in its application to local political phenomena. This article examines and makes recommendations on issues that are particularly relevant to cross-national research in urban politics and policy, including dealing with multiple levels of analysis, improving research design, and improving conceptualization.
Boudon, R.1980. The crisis in sociology. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Cameron, D., and R. Hofferbert. 1974. The impact of federalism on education finance: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Political Research2: 225-258.
3.
Castells, M.1996. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume 2: The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Coleman, J.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
5.
Collier, D.1993. The comparative method. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, edited by A. Finifter, 105-119. Washington DC: American Political Science Association.
6.
Collier, D., and J. Mahon, Jr.1993. Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review87:845-855.
7.
Collier, D., and J. Mahoney. 1996. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics49:56-91.
8.
Crenson, M.1983. Neighborhood politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9.
Dahl, R.1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
10.
Denters, B.2002. Size and political trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20:793-812.
11.
Denters, B., and L. Rose, eds. 2005. Comparing local governance, trends and developments. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
12.
DiGaetano, A., and J. Klemanski. 1999. Power and city governance: Comparative perspectives on urban development. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
13.
DiGaetano, A., and E. Strom. 2003. Comparative urban governance: An integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review38:356-395.
14.
Dogan, M., and D. Pelassy. 1990. How to compare nations: Strategies in comparative politics. 2d ed.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
15.
Dowding, K., P. Dunleavy, D. King, H. Margetts, and Y. Rydin. 1999. Regime politics in London local government. Urban Affairs Review34:515-545
16.
Eckstein, H.1975. Case study and political theory. In Handbook of Political Science, volume 7, edited by F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, 79-137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Fischer, C.1995. The subcultural theory of urbanism: A twentieth-year assessment. The American Journal of Sociology. 101:543-577.
18.
Gaardsted Frandsen, A.2002. Size and electoral participation in local elections. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20:853-869.
19.
Gregg, P.1974. Units and levels in analysis: A problem of policy analysis in federal systems. Publius4:59-86.
20.
Hague, R., and M. Harrop. 2004. Comparative government and politics: An introduction. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
21.
Hall, P.1998. Cities in civilization. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
22.
Hambleton, R.1996. Leadership in local government. Bristol: Faculty of the Built Environment, University of the West of England.
23.
Hesse J., and L. Sharpe. 1991. Local government in international perspective: Some comparative observations. In Local government and urban affairs in international perspective: Analyses of twenty Western industrialised countries, edited by J. Hesse, 603-621. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
24.
Hoffmann-Martinot, V., C. Rallings, and M. Thrasher. 1996. Comparing local electoral turnout in Great Britain and France: More similarities than differences?European Journal of Political Research30:241-257.
25.
Hoffmann-Martinot, V., and J. Sellers, eds. 2005. Metropolitanization and political change. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
26.
Huckfeldt, R.1986. Politics in context: Assimilation and conflict in urban neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.
27.
Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague. 1993. Citizens, contexts, and politics. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, edited by A. Finifter, 281-303. Washington DC: American Political Science Association.
28.
Jackman, R.1985. Cross-national statistical research and the study of comparative politics. American Journal of Political Science. 29:161-182.
29.
John, P., and A. Cole. 1999. Political leadership in the new urban governance: Britain and France compared. Local Government Studies25:98-115.
30.
Kee, W.1967. State and local fiscal systems and municipal expenditures. Public Administration Review27:39-41.
31.
Kelleher, C., and D. Lowery. 2004. Political participation and metropolitan institutional contexts. Urban Affairs Review39:720-757.
32.
Kilburn, H.2004. Explaining U.S. urban regimes. A qualitative comparative analysis. Urban Affairs Review. 39(5): 663-651.
33.
King, G., R. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
34.
King, G., C. Murray, J. Salomon, and A. Tandon. 2004. Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research (corrected version). American Political Science Review98:191-207.
35.
Laitin, D.1995. The qualitative-quantitative disputation: Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba’s “Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research.”American Political Science Review89:454-481.
36.
Lelieveldt, H.2004. Helping citizens help themselves: Neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust and norms on neighborhood oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review39:531-551.
37.
Lichbach, M.1997. Social theory and comparative politics. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure, edited by M. Lichbach, and A. Zuckerman,239-276. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38.
Lidstrom, A.1999. The comparative study of local government systems: A research agenda. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice1:97-115.
39.
Lijphart, A.1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review65:682-693.
40.
Luttbeg, N.1999. The grassroots of democracy: A comparative study of competition and its impact in American cities in the 1990s. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
41.
Miller, W.1988. Irrelevant elections? The quality of local democracy in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
42.
Mossberger, K., and G. Stoker. 2001. The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review36:810-835.
43.
Mossberger, K., and H. Wolman. 2003. Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenges and recommendations. Public Administration Review63:428-440.
44.
Mouritzen, P., and J. Svara. 2002. Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
45.
Oliver, J.1999. The effects of metropolitan economic segregation on local civic participation. American Journal of Political Science43:186-212.
46.
Page E., and M. Goldsmith. 1987. Central and local government relations: A comparative analysis of Western European unitary states. London: Sage.
47.
Parry, G., G. Moyser, and N. Day. 1992. Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
48.
Peters, B.1998. Comparative politics: Theory and methods. New York: New York Univ. Press.
Przeworski, A., and H. Teune. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
51.
Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
52.
Rae, D. W.2003. City. urbanism and its end. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
53.
Ragin, C.1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
54.
Rallings, C., M. Temple, and M. Thrasher. 1996. Participation in local elections. In Local democracy and local government, edited by L. Pratchett and D. Wilson, 62-83. Houndmills, UK: MacMillan Press.
55.
Rose L.2002. Municipal size and local nonelectoral participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands and Norway. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20:829-852.
56.
Rose, R.1991a. What is lesson-drawing?Journal of Public Policy11:3-30.
57.
Rose, R.1991b. Comparing forms of comparative analysis. Political Studies39:446-462.
58.
Sartori, G.1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review64:1033-1053.
59.
Sartori, G.1991. Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics3:243-267.
60.
Sellers, J.2002. Governing from below: Urban regions and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
61.
Sellers, J.2005. Re-placing the nation. An agenda for comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review40:419-445.
62.
Sharpe, L., and K. Newton. 1984. Does politics matter? The determinants of public policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
63.
Snijders, T., and Bosker, R.1999. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
64.
Snyder, R.2001. Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development36:93-110.
Stoker, G., and K. Mossberger. 1994. Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy12:195-212.
67.
Torgerson, D.1995. Policy analysis and public life: The restoration of “phronesis”? In Political science in history: Research programs and political traditions, edited by J. Farr, J. Dryzek, and S. Leonard, 225-252. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
68.
Van Deth, J.1998. Equivalence in comparative political research. In Comparative politics: the problem of equivalence, edited by J. Van Deth, 1-19, London: Routledge.
69.
Vetter, A. 2002. Lokale Politik als Ressource der Demokratie in Europa? Lokale Autonomie, Lokale Strukturen und die Einstellungen der Bürger zur lokalen Politik. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
70.
Wirth, L.1938. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology. 44:1-24.
71.
Yin, R.2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
Zuckerman, A.1997. Reformulating explanatory standards and advancing theory in comparative politics. In Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure, edited by M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman, 277-310. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
