Fragmentation, or the proliferation of independent jurisdictions, is a key feature of the political structure in many metropolitan areas in the United States. This article engages sorting theories to investigate racial segregation as one potential negative consequence of school district fragmentation in metropolitan areas. The main results suggest that fragmentation does increase multiracial segregation between districts. Using a decomposable segregation measure, the author also finds that fragmentation has a negative impact on segregation within districts and no significant effect on tract-level segregation. Additionally, the results suggest that the causes of segregation may differ for various race/ethnic groups. I argue here that segregation between political units may in fact be more appropriate than segregation between smaller units, such as census tracts, if one believes that the negative consequences of segregation stem from access to and social interactions within public institutions.
Alesina, A., R. Baqir, and C. Hoxby.2004. Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. Journal of Political Economy112 (2): 348-96.
2.
Bruck, A.2008. Overruled by home rule. Seton Hall Legislative Journal32 (2): 1-46.
3.
Clotfelder, C.T.1999. Public school segregation in metropolitan areas. Land Economics74 (4): 487-504.
4.
---. 2004. After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
5.
Danielson, M.V.1976. The politics of exclusion. New York : Columbia Univ. Press.
6.
Figlio, D., and M. Lucas.2004. What's in a grade? school report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review94 (3): 591-604.
7.
Fischer, M.2003. The relative importance of class and race in determining residential outcomes in U.S. urban areas, 1970-2000. Urban Affairs Review38 (5): 669-96.
8.
Frank. A. I.2001. Geopolitical fragmentation: A force in spatial segregation in the US!?Paper presented at the International Seminar on Segregation in the City, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
9.
Frey, W.H., and D. Myers.2005. Racial segregation in US Metropolitan areas and cities, 1990-2000: Patterns, trends, and explanations. Research Report No. 05-573, Population Studies Center, Univ. of Michigan.
10.
Haurin, D., and D. Brasington.1996. School quality and real house prices: Inter- and intrametropolitan effects. Journal of Housing Economics5:351-68.
11.
Hill, R.1974. Separate and unequal: Governmental inequality in the metropolis . American Political Science Review68 (4): 1557-68.
12.
Hoxby, C.2000. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review90 (5): 1209-38.
13.
Iceland, J., and E. Steinmetz.2003. The effects of using census block groups instead of census tracts when examining residential housing patterns. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
14.
Iceland, J., D. Weinberg, and E. Steinmetz.2002. Racial and ethnic segregation in the United States: 1980-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
15.
Logan, J.R., B.J. Stults, and R. Farley.2004. Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography41 (1): 1-22.
16.
Mogulof, M.1971. Governing metropolitan areas: A critical review of council of governments and the federal role. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17.
Morgan, D., and P. Mareschal.1999. Central-city/suburban inequality and metropolitan political fragmentation. Urban Affairs Review34 (4): 578-95.
18.
National Center for Education Statistics.2006. State nonfiscal survey of public elementary/secondary education, 2005-06, version 1a. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Orfield, G., and C. Lee.2007. Historical reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project atUniv. of CaliforniaLos Angeles .
20.
Orfield, M.1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
21.
---. 2002. American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Reardon, S., and G. Firebaugh.2002. Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology32:33-67.
23.
Reardon, S., and D. O'Sullivan.2004. Measures of spatial segregation. Sociological Methodology34:121-62.
24.
Reardon, S., J.T. Yun, and T. Eitle.2000. The changing structure of school segregation: Measurement and evidence of multiracial metropolitan-area school segregation, 1989-1995. Demography37 (3): 351-64.
25.
Rhode, P., and K. Strumpf.2003. Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: Local heterogeneity from 1850-1990. American Economic Review93 (5): 1648-77.
26.
Rivkin, S.1994. Residential segregation and school integration. Sociology of Education67 (4): 279-92.
27.
Rusk, D.1995. Cities without suburbs. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson Center.
28.
Schelling, T.C.1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
29.
Shure, J.2007. Ending New Jersey's fragmentation. City Belt, February 25. http://citybelt.typepad.com/print/endnewjerseysfragment.htm .
30.
Teaford, J.1979. City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
31.
Theil, H.1972. Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
32.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Public Economy64 (5): 416-24.
33.
Tobin, G.1987. Divided neighborhoods: Changing patterns of racial segregation . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Urquiola, M.2005. Does school choice lead to sorting? Evidence from Tiebout variation. American Economic Review95 (4): 1310-26.
35.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2002. 2002 census of governments. http://ftp2.census.gov/govs/cog/2002COGprelim_report.pdf.
36.
---. 2008. USA quick facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html .
37.
Weiher, G.1991. Fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
