Synthesizing and extending multiple literatures, this article develops a new approach for exploring the spatial articulation of urban political cleavages. We pursue three questions: (1) To what extent does electoral conflict materialize between rather than within neighborhoods? (2) How salient are group, place, and location in defining urban cleavages? (3) How do these sources inflect one another? To answer these questions, the article analyzes a novel longitudinal database of neighborhood-scale mayoral voting in Chicago, Toronto, and London. We find strong evidence of spatially articulated cleavages: in each city, voting patterns are equally or more geographically concentrated than the non-White population, income, and poverty. While group-based interests define Chicago’s cleavage structure, place and location are paramount in Toronto and London. We conclude by proposing a research agenda for investigating the spatiality of urban politics and advancing a preliminary typology of urban political cleavages and the conditions under which they may arise.
AllenJeffTaylorZack. 2018. “A New Tool for Neighbourhood Change Research: The Canadian Longitudinal Census Tract Database, 1971–2016.” Canadian Geographer62 (4): 575–88.
2.
AnselinLucSridharanSanjeevGholstonSusan. 2007. “Using Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis to Leverage Social Indicator Databases: The Discovery of Interesting Patterns.” Social Indicators Research82 (2): 287–309.
3.
ArceneauxKevinSteinRobert M.2006. “Who Is Held Responsible When Disaster Strikes? The Attribution of Responsibility for a Natural Disaster in an Urban Election.” Journal of Urban Affairs28 (1): 43–53.
4.
BartoliniStefanoMairPeter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
5.
BenjaminAndrea. 2017. Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
6.
BischoffKendraReardonSean F.2014. “Residential Segregation by Income, 1970-2009.” In Diversity and Disparities: America Enters a New Century, edited by LoganJohn R., 208–33. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BoalFredenrick W.2008. “Territoriality on the Shankill–Falls Divide, Belfast.” Irish Geography41 (3): 349–66.
8.
BoboLawrenceHutchingsVincent L.1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review61 (6): 951–72.
9.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2015. “How Places Shape Identity: The Origins of Distinctive LBQ Identities in Four Small U.S. Cities.” American Journal of Sociology121 (1): 1–63.
10.
BrowningRufusDaleP.MarshallRDavidH. Tabb, eds. 2003. Racial Politics in American Cities. 3rd ed.New York: Longman Publishers.
11.
CastellsManuel. 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
CastellsManuel. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
13.
ChoWendy K. TamGimpelJames G.DyckJoshua J.2006. “Residential Concentration, Political Socialization, and Voter Turnout.” The Journal of Politics68 (1): 156–67.
DahlRobert A.1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
16.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
17.
DemšarUrškaHarrisPaulBrunsdonChrisFotheringhamA. StewartMcLooneSean. 2013. “Principal Component Analysis on Spatial Data: An Overview.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers103 (1): 106–28.
18.
DoeringJan. 2020. Us Versus Them: Race, Crime, and Gentrification in Chicago Neighborhoods. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
19.
DunleavyPatrick. 1979. “The Urban Basis of Political Alignment: Social Class, Domestic Property Ownership, and State Intervention in Consumption Processes.” British Journal of Political Science9 (4): 409–43.
FischelWilliam A.2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
26.
GabrielK. Ruben. 1971. “The Biplot Graphic Display of Matrices with Application to Principal Component Analysis.” Biometrika58 (3): 453–67.
27.
GainsboroughJuliet. 2001. Fenced Off: The Suburbanization of American Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
28.
GalsterGeorge C.2019. Making Our Neighborhoods, Making Our Selves. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
29.
GelmanAndrew. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
30.
GierynThomas F.2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology26:463–96.
HajnalZoltanTrounstineJessica. 2014. “What Underlies Urban Politics? Race, Class, Ideology, Partisanship, and the Urban Vote.” Urban Affairs Review50 (1): 63–99.
34.
HopkinsDaniel J.WilliamsonThad. 2012. “Inactive by Design? Neighborhood Design and Political Participation.” Political Behavior34:79–101.
35.
HulchanskiJ. David. 2010. The Three Cities within Toronto: Income Polarization among Toronto’s Neighbourhoods, 1970–2005. Toronto: Cities Centre, Univ. of Toronto.
LazarsfeldPaul F.BerelsonBernardGaudetHazel. 1944. The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
41.
LeVanCarrie. 2020. “Neighborhoods That Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation.” American Politics Research48 (2): 286–94.
42.
LevineMarc. 1991. The Reconquest of Montreal. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
43.
LloydRichard D.2006. Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Postindustrial City. New York: Routledge.
44.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey. 2007. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
45.
LoganJohn R.XuZenwangStultsBrian J.2014. “Interpolating U.S. Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010: A Longitudinal Tract Database.” The Professional Geographer66 (3): 412–20.
46.
LorincJohn. 2004. “The Ascent of David Miller: How a Crack Campaign Turned a Long Shot into the King of the City.” Toronto Life, January, 64–76.
47.
MansonStevenSchroederJonathan P.RiperDavid vanRugglesSteven. 2018. IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 13.0 [Database]. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota.
MillerDianaSilverDaniel. 2015. “Cultural Scenes and Contextual Effects on Political Attitudes.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 2 (3–4): 241–66.
50.
MollenkopfJohn. 1992. A Phoenix in the Ashes: The Rise and Fall of the Koch Coalition in New York City Politics. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
51.
MolotchHarveyFreudenburgWilliamPaulsenKrista E.2000. “History Repeats Itself, But How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place.” American Sociological Review65 (6): 791–823.
MurphyAlexandra K.WallaceDanielle. 2010. “Opportunities for Making Ends Meet and Upward Mobility: Differences in Organizational Deprivation Across Urban and Suburban Poor Neighborhoods.” Social Science Quarterly91 (5): 1164–86.
OffeClaus. 1987. “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s.” In Challenging the Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe, edited by MaierCharles S., 63–105. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
56.
OgorzalekThomas K.2018. The Cities on the Hill: How Urban Institutions Transform National Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
57.
OldenburgRay. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day. 1st ed. New York: Paragon House.
58.
OliverJ. Eric. 2010. The Paradoxes of Integration: Race, Neighborhood, and Civic Life in Multiethnic America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
59.
ParkRobert EzraBurgessE. W.1925. The City. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
60.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward K.2007. Ideology and Congress. Oxford: Routledge.
61.
RoddenJonathan. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.
62.
RosenzweigCynthiaSoleckiWilliamLankaoPatricia RomeroMehrotraShagunDhakalShobhakarIbrahimSomayya Ali, eds. 2018. Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
RuskDavid. 2013. Cities without Suburbs: A Census 2010 Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
65.
SampsonRobert J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighbourhood Effect. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
66.
SampsonRobert J.MacIndoeHeatherMcAdamDougWeffer-ElizondoSimón. 2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology111 (3): 673–714.
67.
SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.1999. “Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods.” American Journal of Sociology105 (3): 603–51.
68.
SassenSaskia. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
69.
SauerzopfRichardSwanstromTodd. 1999. “The Urban Electorate in Presidential Elections, 1920–1996.” Urban Affairs Review35 (1): 72–91.
70.
SellersJefferey M.KüblerDanielWalter-RoggMelanieWalksRobert Alan. 2013. The Political Ecology of the Metropolis: Metropolitan Sources of Electoral Behaviour in Eleven Countries. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
71.
SmallMario L.2004. Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
72.
SmallMario L.2007. “Is There Such a Thing as ‘the Ghetto’?”City11 (3): 413–21.
73.
SomarribaNoeliaPenaBernardo. 2009. “Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Life in Europe.” Social Indicators Research94 (1): 115–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9356-y.
74.
SonensheinRaphael J.PinkusSusan H.2005. “Latino Incorporation Reaches the Urban Summit: How Antonio Villaraigosa Won the 2005 Los Angeles Mayor’s Race.” PS: Political Science and Politics38 (4): 713–21.
75.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
76.
SugrueThomas J.2005. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
77.
SwanstromTodd. 1985. The Crisis of Growth Politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the Challenge of Urban Populism. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
78.
TraversTony. 2015. London’s Boroughs at 50. London: Biteback Publishing.
79.
TrounstineJessica. 2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
80.
UrryJohn. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society21 (4–5): 25–39.
81.
Van GuntenTodMartinJohnTeplitskiyMisha. 2016. “Consensus, Polarization, and Alignment in the Economics Profession.” Sociological Science3:1028–52. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a45.
82.
WalkerKyle E.2013. “Political Segregation of the Metropolis: Spatial Sorting by Partisan Voting in Metropolitan Minneapolis-St Paul.” City & Community12 (1): 35–55.
83.
WalksAlan. 2010. “New Divisions: Social Polarization and Neighbourhood Inequality in the Canadian City.” In Canadian Cities in Transition: New Directions in the Twenty-First Century, edited by BuntingTrudiFilionPierreWalkerRyan, 171–90. Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press.
84.
WalksAlan. 2015. “Driving the Vote: Automobility, Ideology, and Political Partisanship..” In The Urban Political Economy and Ecology of Automobility: Driving Cities, Driving Inequality, Driving Politics, edited by WalksAlan, 199–220. London: Routledge.
85.
WebberRichardBurrowsRoger. 2018. The Predictive Postcode: The Geodemographic Classification of British Society. London: SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
