The lifetime prevalence of sexual abuse in institutional settings in Germany was examined in a sample representative of the general adult population (N = 2,437). Participants completed a survey on whether they had ever experienced such abuse, its nature (contact, noncontact, forced sexual, intercourse), the type of institution (e.g. school, club), and the relationship of perpetrator to victim (peer, caregiver, staff member). Overall, 3.1% of adult respondents (women: 4.8%, men: 0.8%) reported having experienced some type of sexual abuse in institutions. Adult women reported higher rates of all types than did men, with rates of 3.9% versus 0.8% for contact sexual abuse, 1.2% versus 0.3% for noncontact sexual abuse, and 1.7% versus 0.2% for forced sexual intercourse. We conclude that a remarkable proportion of the general population experiences sexual abuse in institutions, underscoring the need for development of protective strategies. Especially, schools seem to represent good starting points for primary prevention strategies.
AllroggenM.RassenhoferM.WittA.PlenerP. L.BrahlerE.FegertJ. M. (2016). The prevalence of sexual violence—Results from a population-based sample. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 113, 107-113.
2.
AllroggenM.RauT.OhlertJ.FegertJ. M. (2017). Lifetime prevalence and incidence of sexual victimization of adolescents in institutional care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 66, 23-30.
BöhmB.ZollnerH.FegertJ. M.LiebhardtH. (2014). Child sexual abuse in the context of the Roman Catholic Church: A review of literature from 1981-2013. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23, 635-656.
ButchartA.HarveyA. P.MianM.FurnissT. (2006). Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
7.
Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse. (2003). Third interim report. Dublin, Ireland: Government Publication.
8.
CravenS.BrownS.GilchristE. (2006). Sexual grooming: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 287-299.
9.
DaleK. A.AlpertJ. L. (2007). Hiding behind the cloth: Child sexual abuse and the Catholic Church. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16, 59-74.
10.
De BellisM. D. (2001). Developmental traumatology: The psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 539-564.
11.
DeetmanW.DaijerN.KalbfleischP.MerckelbachH.MonteiroM.De VriesG. (2011). Deetman-Rapport: Seksueel Misbruik van Minderjarigen in de Rooms Katholieke Kerk. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Balans.
12.
ElliottM.BrowneK.KilcoyneJ. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: What offenders tell us. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 579-594.
13.
EuserS.AlinkL. R.PannebakkerF.VogelsT.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2013). The prevalence of child maltreatment in the Netherlands across a 5-year period. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 841-851.
14.
FangX.BrownD. S.FlorenceC. S.MercyJ. A. (2012). The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 156-165.
15.
FinkelhorD. (1994). The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 409-417.
16.
FinkelhorD.JonesL. M. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined?Journal of Social Issues, 62, 685-716.
17.
FinkelhorD.JonesL. M. (2012). Have sexual abuse and physical abuse declined since the 1990s?Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center.
18.
FinkelhorD.OrmrodR. K.TurnerH. A. (2007). Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(1), 7-26.
19.
FinkelhorD.TurnerH.OrmrodR.HambyS. L. (2010). Trends in childhood violence and abuse exposure: Evidence from 2 national surveys. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 238-242.
20.
GallagherB. (2000). extent and nature of known cases of institutional child sexual abuse. BritishJournal of Social Work, 30(6), 795-817.
21.
GilbertR.WidomC. S.BrowneK.FergussonD. M.WebbE.JansonS. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. The Lancet, 373, 68-81.
22.
HabethaS.BleichS.WeidenhammerJ.FegertJ. M. (2012). A prevalence-based approach to societal costs occurring in consequence of child abuse and neglect. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 6(1), 35.
23.
HardtJ.RutterM. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 260-273.
24.
HäuserW.SchmutzerG.BrählerE.GlaesmerH. (2011). Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: Results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108, 287-294.
25.
HerrenkohlR. C.HerrenkohlT. I. (2009). Assessing a child’s experience of multiple maltreatment types: Some unfinished business. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 485-496.
26.
IfflandB.BrahlerE.NeunerF.HauserW.GlaesmerH. (2013). Frequency of child maltreatment in a representative sample of the German population. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 980.
27.
John Jay College Study. (2004). The nature and scope of the problem of sexual abuse of minors by catholic priests and deacons in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
28.
LangelandW.HoogendoornA. W.MagerD.SmitJ. H.DraijerN. (2015). Childhood sexual abuse by representatives of the Roman Catholic Church: A prevalence estimate among the Dutch population. Child Abuse & Neglect, 46, 67-77.
29.
LeebR. T.PaulozziL.MelansonC.SimonT.AriasI. (2008). Child maltreatment surveillance: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
30.
Lueger-SchusterB.KantorV.WeindlD.KnefelM.MoyY.ButolloA.. . . GlückT. (2014). Institutional abuse of children in the Austrian Catholic Church: Types of abuse and impact on adult survivors’ current mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 52-64.
31.
MiddletonW.StavropoulosP.DorahyM. J.KrugerC.Lewis-FernandezR.Martinez-TaboasA.. . . BrandB. (2014). The Australian Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(1), 17-21.
32.
PeredaN.GuileraG.FornsM.Gomez-BenitoJ. (2009). The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse: A continuation of Finkelhor (1994). Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 331-342.
33.
RadfordL.CorralS.BradleyC.FisherH.BassettC.HowatN.CollishawS. (2011). Child abuse and neglect in the UK today. London, England: NSPCC.
34.
RassenhoferM.ZimmerA.SproberN.FegertJ. M. (2015). Child sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church in Germany: Comparison of victim-impact data collected through church-sponsored and government-sponsored programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 40, 60-67.
35.
Runder Tisch. (2012). Sexueller Kindesmissbrauch in Abhängigkeits- und Machtverhältnissen in privaten und öffentlichen Einrichtungen und im familiären Bereich [Child Sexual Abuse in dependent and power relationships in private or official institutions and families: report]. Abschlussbericht. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium der Justiz, Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren Frauen und Jugend, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
36.
SethiD.BellisM.HughesK.GilbertR.MitisF.GaleaG. (2013). European report on preventing child maltreatment. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
37.
SpröberN.SchneiderT.RassenhoferM.SeitzA.LiebhardtH.KonigL.FegertJ. M. (2014). Child sexual abuse in religiously affiliated and secular institutions: A retrospective descriptive analysis of data provided by victims in a government-sponsored reappraisal program in Germany. BMC Public Health, 14, 282.
38.
StadlerL.BieneckS.PfeifferC. (2012a). Repräsentativbefragung Sexueller Missbrauch 2011: Forschungsbericht Nr. 118 [Representative Survey sexual abuse 2011: Report Nr. 118]. Hanover, Germany: Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen.
39.
StadlerL.BieneckS.WetzelsP. (2012b). Viktimisierung durch sexuellen Kindesmissbrauch: Befunde national-räpresntativer Dunkelfeldforschung zu Entwicklungstrends in Deutschland [Child sexual victimization: results of represenatative Research and Trends in Germany]. Praxis Der Rechtspsychologie, 22, 190-220.
StoltenborghM.van IjzendoornM. H.EuserE. M.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J. (2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreat, 16, 79-101.
43.
TimmermannG. (2003). Sexual harassment of adolescents perpetrated by teachers and by peers: An exploration of the dynamics of power, culture, and gender in secondary schools. Sex Roles, 48, 231-244.
44.
TurnerD.RettenbergerM.YoonD.KleinV.EherR.BrikenP. (2014). Risk assessment in child sexual abusers working with children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 572-596.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2014). Abschließende Bemerkungen des VN-Ausschusses für die Rechte des Kindes vom 31. Januar 2014 zum gemeinsamen dritten und vierten periodischen Staatenbericht Deutschlands [Concluding observations on the combined third and fourth periodic reports of Germany] (Deutsche Arbeitsübersetzung). New York, NY: United Nations.
47.
WalshK.ZwiK.WoolfendenS.ShlonskyA. (2015). School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. The Cochrane Library.
48.
WittA.MunzerA.GanserH. G.FegertJ. M.GoldbeckL.PlenerP. L. (2016). Experience by children and adolescents of more than one type of maltreatment: Association of different classes of maltreatment profiles with clinical outcome variables. Child Abuse & Neglect, 57, 1-11.
