The concept of harm reduction applied to sexual offending is very upsetting to some clinicians. This paper attempts to anchor harm reduction within the larger framework of relapse prevention. It is argued that reducing harm more accurately represents what clinicians do with sexual offenders rather than preventing or eliminating relapses. There are numerous common misconceptions about harm reduction with sexual offenders and explanations are provided for each of these. Finally, it is argued that harm reduction acknowledges that sexual abuse and all forms of interpersonal violence are actually public health issues. Adoption of this viewpoint, however, requires acceptance of a more humanistic perspective rather than a medical, psychological, legal, or political solution to a grievous social problem.
Des Jarlais, D.C. (1995). Editorial: Harm reduction: A framework for incorporating science into drug policy. American Journal of Public Health , 85, 10-12.
George, W.H., & Marlatt, G.A. (1989). Introduction. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford.
4.
Laws, D.R. (1996). Relapse prevention or harm reduction?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 243-247.
5.
Laws, D.R. (1989). Relapse prevention with sex offenders. New York: Guilford.
6.
Laws, D.R., & Osborn, C.A. (1983). How to build and operate a behavioral laboratory to evaluate and treat sexual deviance. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor (pp. 293-335). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7.
Maletzky, B. (1998). Harm facilitation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 77-80.
8.
Marlatt, G.A. (1985). Relapse prevention: Theoretical rationale and overview of the model. In G. A. Marlatt & J. R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention (pp. 3-70). New York: Guilford.
Pare, R. (1997a). Relapse prevention or harm reduction? Making the case for relapse prevention. Unpublished manuscript.
11.
Pare, R. (1997b). Making a case for relapse prevention: Holding the line in an age of compromise. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Arlington, VA, Oct.
12.
Pithers, W.D., Marques, J.K., Gibat, C.C., & Marlatt, G.A. (1983). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressives: A self-control model of treatment and maintenance of change. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor (pp. 214-239). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
13.
Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change (pp. 3-27). New York: Plenum.
14.
Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S.H., & Marshall, W.L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452-472.
15.
Ward, T., Hudson, S.H., & Keenan, T. (1998). A self-regulation model of the sexual offense process. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 10, 141-157.
