Business professionals increasingly use digital tools to collaborate across multiple cultures, locations, and time zones. Success in this complex environment depends on a shared culture that facilitates the making of knowledge and the best contributions of all team members. To prepare managers for such communication, the authors designed and implemented a semester-long intercultural virtual team project between a management communication course in the United States and one in Canada. To prevent faultlines between subgroups on each campus, the authors set a clear outcome for students’ research, established equity between the two sites, structured assignments so that students worked interdependently across sites”, and encouraged inclusive communication. Faculty considering such a partnership should incorporate a robust collaborative workspace, incorporate preliminary exercises before a large project, provide intensive mentoring and instruction on peer review, arrange for a real visit or videoconference between locations, and expect the project to be both fun and demanding.
Andrews, D. C., & Andrews, W. D. (2004). Management communication: A guide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
3.
Cramton, C. D. (2002a). Attribution in distributed work teams. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 191-212). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Cramton, C. D. (2002b). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 356-367.
5.
Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 231-263). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6.
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
8.
DiStefano, J. J., & Maznevski, M. L. (2000). Creating value with diverse teams in global management. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 45-53.
9.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26-49.
10.
Hart, R. K., & McLeod, P. L. (2003). Rethinking team building in geographically dispersed teams: One message at a time. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 352-361.
11.
Herrington, T. (2004). Where in the world is the Global Classroom Project? In J. Di Leo & W. Jacobs (Eds.), If classrooms matter: Progressive visions of educational environments (pp. 197-210). New York: Routledge.
12.
Herrington, T., & Tretyakov, Y. (2005). The Global Classroom Project: Troublemaking and troubleshooting. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 267-283). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
13.
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615-632.
14.
LeRouge, C., Blanton, J. E., & Kittner, M. (2002). The other semi-virtual team: Using collaborative technologies to facilitate student team projects. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Academy for Information Management (IAIM) Conference, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 164-174). Statesboro, GA: International Academy for Information Management.
15.
Mannix, E., Griffith, T., & Neale, M. A. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 213-233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 212-238.
17.
O’Leary, M., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Subgroups with attitude: Imbalance and isolation in geographically dispersed teams. Honolulu, HI: Academy of Management.
18.
Richman, A., Noble, K., & Johnson, A. (2002). When the workplace is many places: The extent and nature of off-site work today. Watertown, MA: WFD Consulting. Executive Summary retrieved April 24, 2005, from http://www.abcdependentcare.com/docs/ABC_Executive_Summary_final.pdf
19.
Sapp, D. (2004). Global partnerships in business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 267-280.
20.
Schneider, B., & Andre, J. (2005). University preparation of workplace writing: An exploratory study of the perceptions of students in three disciplines. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 195-218.
21.
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 468-499.
22.
Starke-Meyerring, D., & Andrews, D. (in press). Building a culture of intercultural learning: Assessment in an intercultural virtual team project. In J. Allen & M. Hundleby (Eds.), Assessment in technical and professional communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Zhu, Y., Gareis, E., O’Keefe Bazzoni, J., & Rolland, D. (2005). A collaborative online project between New Zealand and New York. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 81-96.
