Continuous viscosity of the sugar melt ranged from the superheated to the supercooled, was measured with a rotating viscometer. The thermal properties of sugars have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetric and thermogravimetry. The melt fragility and the fragility of the supercooled liquid have been calculated. This study indicated that, for the whole sugar system, the melt fragility and the fragility of the supercooled liquid separately show negative linear relations with the glass-forming ability and can be used as indicators of this property. In an individual sugar system, the fragility of the supercooled liquid has a direct proportion to melt fragility, which depends on the different inherent characteristic temperatures.
AngellCA (1985). Spectroscopy simulation and scattering, and the medium range order problem in glass. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids73: 1–31–17.
2.
AhmedJPrabhuSTRaghavanGSVNgadiM (2007). Physico-chemical, rheological, calorimetric and dielectric behavior of selected Indian honey. Journal of Food Engineering79(4): 1207–1213.
3.
BöhmerRAngellCA (1992). Correlations of the nonexponentiality and state dependence of mechanical relaxations with bond connectivity in Ge-As-Se supercooled liquids. Physical Review B45(17): 10091–10094.
4.
BöhmerRNgaiKLAngellCAPlazekDJ (1993). Nonexponential relaxations in strong and fragile glass formers. The Journal of Chemical Physics99(5): 4201–4209.
5.
BianXFSunMHLeiWChengSJ (2002). Variation of activation energy in Al-Ni-based alloy melts. Materials Research Bulletin37(8): 1451–1458.
6.
BianXFSunBAHuLNJiaYB (2005). Fragility of superheated melts and the glass forming ability in Al-based amorphous alloys. Physics Letters A315: 61–67.
7.
CiceroneMTSolesCL (2004). Fast dynamics and stabilization of proteins: binary glasses of trehalose and glycerol. Biophysical Journal86(6): 3836–3845.
8.
CumminsHZZhangHPOhJYSeoJAKimHKHwangYH (2006). The liquid-glass transition in sugars: relaxation dynamics in trehalose. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids352(42): 4464–4474.
9.
GrigeraJRBolziccoVV (2008). Molecular mobility and ageing of sugar glasses. Food Chemistry106(4): 1314–1317.
10.
HinrichsWLPrinsenMGFrijlinkHW (2001). Inulin glasses for the stabilization of therapeutic proteins. International Journal of Pharmaceutics215(1–2): 163–174.
11.
Hartel RW (2001). Crystallization in Foods. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc. pp. 1–9.
12.
InoueAZhangTMasumotoT (1993). Glass-forming ability of alloys. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids156–158: 473–480.
13.
JouppilaKRossYH (1994). Glass transition and crystallization of milk powders. Journal of Dairy Science77(7): 1799–1807.
14.
KimSJKarisTE (1995). Glass formation from low molecular weight organic melts. Journal of Material Research10(8): 2128–2136.
15.
KivelsonDTarjusG (1998). SuperArrhenius character of supercooled glass-forming liquids. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids235–237: 86–100.
16.
LuZPLiuCT (2002). New glass-forming ability criterion for bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia50(13): 3501–3512.
17.
MazzobreMFSotoGAguileraJMBueraMP (2001). Crystallization kinetics of lactose in sytems co-lyofilized with trehalose. Analysis by differential scanning calorimetry. Food research International34(10): 903–911.
18.
MengQGZhouJKZhengHXLiJG (2006). Fragility of superheated melts and glass-forming ability in Pr-based alloys. Scripta Materialia54(5): 777–781.
19.
MengQGZhouJKLiJG (2007). Correlation of superheated fragility and glass-foeming ability inAlNiPr(Si, Cu) alloys. Materials Chemistry and Physics102(1): 39–42.
20.
MauroJCYueYZEllisonAJGuptaPKAllanDC (2009). Viscosity of glass-forming liquids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(47): 19780–19784.
21.
NovikovVNSokolovAP (2004). Poisson's ratio and the fragility of glass-forming liquids. Nature (London)431: 961–963.
22.
OakesME (2005). Bad company: the addition of sugar, fat, or salt reduces the perceived vitamin and mineral content of foods. Food Quality and Preference16(2): 111–119.
23.
RoosYHKarelM (1991). Noneguilibrium ice formation in carbohydrate solutions. Cryo–letters12: 376–376.
24.
RoosYH (1993). Melting and glass transitions of low molecular weight carbohydrates. Carbohydrate Research238: 39–48.
25.
RoosYHKarelMKokiniJL (1996). Glass transition in low water and frozen foods effect on shelf life and quality. Food Technology50(11): 95–108.
26.
RenZFBianXFLinLJBaiYWWangWM (2010). Viscosity and melt fragility in honey-water mixtures. Journal of Food Engineering100(4): 705–710.
27.
SladeLLevineH (1991). Beyond water activity: recent advances based on an alternative approach to the assessment of food quality and safety. Food Science and Nutrition30(2–3): 115–360.
28.
SastryS (2001). The relationship between fragility, configurational entropy and the potential energy landscape of glass-forming liquids. Nature (London)409(6817): 164–167.
29.
SunBABianXFHujMaoTZhangYN (2008). Fragility of superheated melts in Al–RE (Ce, Nd, Pr) alloy system. Materials Characterization59(6): 820–823.
30.
SongKKBianXFLvXQXieMTJiaR (2009). The correlations among the fragility of supercooled liquids, the fragility of superheated melts, and the glass-forming ability for marginal metallic glasses. Journal of Applied Physics105(2): 024304–024304.
31.
TurnbullD (1969). Under what conditions can a glass be formed?Contemporary Physics10(5): 473–488.
32.
WuYQBianXFMengQG (2007). A critical transition state in liquid metals. Materials Letters61(11–12): 2434–2438.
