Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Blending narrative portraiture and feminist methods, this study explored the lives of two rural women who are creative writers. The study asked (1) What are their critical purposes? and (2) How did gender and place intersect in their writing lives? The findings were that the women used creative writing to engage in praxis by creating and disseminating knowledge. Their writing critically interrogated and redefined conceptions of womanhood. Additional critical purposes were unique to women's intersectional identities and lived experiences. They ranged from interrogating societal perspectives of gender, sexuality, and race to interrogating rurality and sexual violence. The aesthetic texts they created articulated and advocated for intersubjective truths. Shifting the focus of critical literacy from pedagogy and reading to writing beyond educational spaces, the women drew upon critical literacy not as a means of being taught how to understand the power of texts, but to wield the power of texts themselves.

Keywords

critical literacy creative writing narrative portraiture feminist methods rurality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abril-Gonzalez

(2020). Accompanying a Nepantlera border artist’s empathy: One Mexican teen’s testimonios of healing, empowerment, and transformation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1108

American Civil Liberties Union (2023). Women’s rights. https://www.aclu.org/issues/womens-rights

Blackburn

M. V.

(2002). Disrupting the (hetero)normative: Exploring literacy performances and identity work with queer youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(4), 312–324.

Brooks

M. D.

(2019). Untapped possibilities: Intersectionality theory and literacy research. In Alvermann

Unrau

Sailors

,, & Ruddall

(Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of Reading (7th ed, pp. 349–361). Routledge.

Brooks

(2017). The song (does not) remain the same: Re-envisioning portraiture methodology in educational research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2332

Cisneros

N. A.

(2021). Indigenous girls write, right!? unsettling urban literacies with indigenous writing pedagogies. Urban Education, 57(10), 1757–1783. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211003933

Clark-Parsons

(2017). Feminist ephemera in a digital world: Theorizing zines as networked feminist practice. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(4), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12172

Corbett

(2013). Improvisation as a curricular metaphor: Imagining education for a rural creative class. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28(10), 1–11.

Corbett

Donehower

(2017). Rural literacies: Toward social cartography. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 32(5), 1–13.

10.

Cox

A. M.

(2015). Shapeshifters: Black girls and the choreography of citizenship. Duke University Press.

11.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

12.

Donehower

(2020). Reconsidering power, privilege, and the public/private distinction in the literacy of rural women. In Daniell

Mortensen

(Eds.), Women and literacy (pp. 91–108). Routledge.

13.

Freire

(1983). Importance of the act of Reading. Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500103

14.

Greer

(2012). Women’s words, womens’s work: Rural literacy and labor. In Donehower

Hogg

,, & Schell

E. E.

(Eds.), Reclaiming the rural: Essays on literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy (pp. 90–106). Southern Illinois University Press.

15.

Guzzetti

B. J.

(2022b). Voices from the margins: Latinx and Chicanx/Filipina women writing ephemeral texts for representation and resistance. In Guzzetti

B. J.

(Ed.), Genders, cultures, and literacies: understanding intersecting identities (pp. 164–178). Routledge.

16.

Guzzetti

B. J.

(2022a). Stories of a healing way: A Navajo woman’s media production for cultural representation and identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.377

17.

Henderson

(2021). Listening for the literacy story: Implementing holistic and asset-based literacy curriculum through literacy portraiture. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1191

18.

Hogg

(2006). From the garden club: Rural women writing community. University of Nebraska Press.

19.

hooks

(1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.

20.

Kelly

L. L.

(2020). Exploring Black girls’ subversive literacies as acts of freedom. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 456–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20966367

21.

LaFrance

Caravella

Polk

Johnson

Wootton

Russo

Corwin

(2021). Fingerprinting feminist methodologies/methods: An analysis of empirical research trends in four composition journals between 2007 and 2016. College Composition and Communication, 72(4), 570–600. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202131442

22.

Lawrence-Lightfoot

Davis

J. H.

(1997). The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass.

23.

Luke

(2019). Regrounding critical literacy: Representation, fact, and reality. In Alvermann

Unrau

Sailors

Ruddall

(Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of Reading ((7th ed, pp. 349–361). Routledge.

24.

Mayo

Blackburn

M. V.

(2020). Misses and connections: Queer, trans, and intersectional. Pedagogies. In Mayo

Blackburn

M. V.

(Eds.), Queer, trans, and intersectional theory in educational practice: Student, teacher, and community experiences (pp. 1–14). Routledge.

25.

McArthur

S. A.

Muhammad

G. E.

(2022). Pens down, don’t shoot: An analysis of how Black young women use language to fight back. Urban Education, 57(5), 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919893734

26.

Mills

K. A.

Comber

(2013). Space, place, and power: The spatial turn in literacy research. In Hall

Cremin

Comber

,, & Moll

L. C.

(Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning, and culture (pp. 412–423). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118323342.ch30

27.

Misson

Morgan

(2006). Critical literacy and the aesthetic: Transforming the English classroom. National Council of Teachers of English.

28.

Montero

Washington

(2021). Narrative approaches: Exploring the phenomenon and/or method. In Mallette

M. H.

Duke

N. K.

(Eds.), Literacy research methodologies ((3rd ed, pp. 291–312). Guilford Press.

29.

Muhammad

G. E.

(2012). Creating spaces for Black adolescent girls to “write it out!”. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00129

30.

Oakley

(1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In Roberts

(Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge.

31.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

32.

Player

G. D.

(2021). “People get mistaken”: Asian American girls using multiple literacies to defy dominant imaginings of Asian American girlhood. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.412

33.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

34.

Sprague

(2016). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Rowman & Littlefield.

35.

Thwaites

(2017). (Re)examining the feminist interview: Rapport, gender “matching,” and emotional labour. Frontiers in Sociology, 2(18), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00018

36.

Vieira

(2019). Writing’s potential to heal: Women writing from their bodies. Community Literacy Journal, 13(2), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1353/clj.2019.0016

37.

Villalobos

(2023). Reimagining intersectionality via the rural-urban borderlands. In Nash

J. C.

Pinto

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to intersectionalities. Taylor & Francis.

38.

Winn

M. T.

(2010). ‘Betwixt and between’: Literacy, liminality, and the celling of Black girls. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 13(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613321003751601

39.

Wissman

K. K.

(2007). “Making a way”: Young women using literacy and language to resist the politics of silencing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.5

40.

Wissman

K. K.

(2011). “Rise up!”: Literacies, lived experiences, and identities within an in-school “other space”. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(4), 405–438.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

0.00 MB