Funding for transit in the United States has been in a state of transition for half a century. Transit has evolved from a private industry sustained by farebox revenues to a public entity supported by federal and, more recently, state and local governments. To better understand the complex funding environment of public transit, especially the role of public subsidies, this research examines the history of public funding for transit, investigates issues that have influenced financial support for transit recently, and compares funding arrangements in ten cities for evidence of how transit agencies are adapting to the current funding environment. The authors find that: (a) the characteristics of local transit funding are strongly influenced by the funding approaches of state governments; (b) dedicated funding for transit is increasingly critical, especially where funds must be raised locally; and (c) metropolitan areas with considerable dedicated funding sources are at an advantage for undertaking large capital projects.
Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
American Public Transportation Association. (2004). Historical ridership trends. Retrieved July 2004 from http://www.apta.com/research/stats/ridershp/ridetrnd.cfm
3.
American Public Transportation Association. (2005). SAFETEA-LU: A guide to transit-related provisions. Retrieved October 2005 from http://www.apta.com
4.
Beale, H. B. R., Bishop, E. R., & Marley, W. G. (1996). How to pass local option taxes to finance transportation projects. Transportation Research Record-Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1558, 74-82.
5.
Beimborn, E., & Puentes, R. (2003). Highways and transit: Leveling the playing field in federal transportation policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Bi-State Development Agency. (2002, December 6). Bi-State Development Agency completes sale of bonds for Cross County extension [Press release]. St. Louis, MO: Author.
7.
Brooks, E. (2004, June). Planners revive study on regional authority for transit. The Business Journal of Milwaukee. Retrieved online.
8.
Brunswick, M., & Smith, M. L. (2001, August 5). Tax bills could creep up. Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. A1.
DeLong, J. V. (1998). Myths of light rail transit. Policy Study No. 244. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
11.
Downs, A. (1992). Stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution.
12.
$11.9-billion mass transit bill signed. (1974). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 30, 688-693. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
13.
Federal Transit Administration. (1992). Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991: Flexible funding opportunities for transit. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Federal Transit Administration. (2002). Annual report on new starts FY 2003. Washington, D.C.: Author.
15.
Federal Transit Administration. (2003). Annual report on new starts FY 2004. Washington, D.C.: Author.
16.
Federal Transit Administration. (2004a). Annual report on new starts FY 2005. Washington, D.C.: Author.
17.
Federal Transit Administration. (2004b). 2002 National Transit database: Transit profiles. Retrieved July 2004 at www.ntdprogram.com
18.
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2005). How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects?Journal of the American Planning Association, 1(2), 131-146.
19.
Fogelson, R. M. (2001). Downtown: Its rise and fall, 1880-1950. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Gebolys, D. (2004, December 10). COTA gets help on loan for light rail. The Columbus Dispatch, p. C7.
21.
Getz, J. (2002a, September 14). Activists press Bi-State to extend MetroLink trains to north St. Louis. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. 15.
22.
Getz, J. (2002b, August 8). Member of Bi-State’s board urges county to pay more for transit. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. A4.
23.
Getz, J. (2003, May 14). Lawyer fights ruling that cleared the way for MetroLink expansion. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. B4.
24.
Goldman, T., Corbett, S., & Wachs, M. (2001). Local option transportation taxes in the United States: Part Two: State-by-state findings. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Transportation Studies.
25.
Goldman, T., & Wachs, M. (2003). A quiet revolution in transportation finance: The rise of local option transportation taxes. Transportation Quarterly, 57(1), 19-32.
26.
Gómez-Ibánez, J. A. (1996). Big-citytransit, ridership, deficits, andpolitics. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1), 30-50.
27.
Hamer, A. M. (1976). The selling of rail rapid transit: A critical look at urban transportation planning. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
Highway act: Compromise on mass transit funds. (1973). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 29, 433-452. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
29.
Highway bill passes over Reagan’s veto. (1987). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 43, 331-336. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Horstman, B. M. (2002, November 6). Proposed light rail system loses big. Cincinnati Post.
32.
Jones, D. W. (1985). Urban transit policy: An economic and political history. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Kain, J. (1988). Choosing the wrong technology: Or how to spend billions and reduce transit use. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 21, 197-213.
34.
Kain, J. F. (1990). Deception in Dallas: Strategic misrepresentation of in the promotion and evaluation of rail transit. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 184-196.
35.
Kain, J. (1992). The use of straw men in the economic evaluation of rail transport projects. American Economic Review, 82(3), 487-493.
36.
Kain, J. (1997). Cost-effective alternatives to Atlanta’s rail rapid transit system. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 31(1), 25-49.
37.
Katz, B., Puentes, R., & Bernstein, S. (2003). TEA-21 reauthorization: Getting transportation right for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
Kirby, R. F. (1992). Financing public transportation. In G. E. Gray & L. A. Hoel (Eds.), Public transportation (pp. 445-460). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Lave, C. (1991). Measuring the decline in transit productivity in the U.S. Transportation Planning and Technology, 15, 115-124.
40.
Levine, J., Park, S., Wallace, R. R., & Underwood, S. E. (1999). Public choice in transit organization and finance: The structure of support. Transportation Research Record-Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1669, 87-95.
41.
Li, J., & Taylor, B. D. (1998). Outlay rates and the politics of capital versus operating subsidies in federal transit finance. Transportation Research Record-Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1618, 78-86.
42.
Linstedt, S. (1993, September 13). NFTA, county set for court fight on funds. The Buffalo News.
43.
Linstedt, S. (2001, September 19). Prospects dim for extension of metro rail line. The Buffalo News, p. B1.
44.
Mackett, R. L., & Edwards, M. (1998). The impact of new urban public transport systems: Will the expectations be met?Transportation Research A, 32(4), 321-345.
45.
McCarthy, R. J. (1993, February 11). Sales tax issue casts a shadow on county hall legislature. The Buffalo News.
46.
Meyer, J. R., Kain, J. F., & Wohl, M. (1965). The urban transportation problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
No money for light rail. (2004, June 11). Cincinnati Post, p. A1.
Pickrell, D. H. (1985). Rising deficits and the uses of transit subsidies in the United States. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 24(3), 281-298.
50.
Pickrell, D. H. (1992). A desire named streetcar: Fantasy and fact in rail transit planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 158-176.
51.
Pilcher, J. (2002, November 6). Metro plan hits wall of resistance. The Cincinnati Enquirer.
52.
Price Waterhouse LLP. (1998). Funding strategies for public transportation: Vol. 1. Transit cooperative research program report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
53.
Pucher, J. (1982). Effects of subsidies on transit costs. Transportation Quarterly, 36(4), 549-562.
54.
Pucher, J., Markstedt, A., & Hirschman, I. (1983). Impacts of subsidies on the costs of urban public transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 17(2), 155-176.
55.
Puentes, R. (2000). Flexible funding for transit: Who uses it?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
56.
Puentes, R. (2004). Washington’s Metro: Deficits by design. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
57.
Rail line can’t wait for studies. (1994, September 26). Engineering News-Record, p. 9.
58.
Rinard, A., & Sandler, L. (1997, September30). Thompson pledge derails light rail. Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, p. 1.
59.
St. Clair, D. J. (1981). The motorization and decline of urban public transit 1935-1950. Journal of Economic History, 41, 579-600.
60.
Saltzman, A. (1992). Public transportation in the 20th century. In G. E. Gray & L. A. Hoel (Eds.), Public transportation (pp. 24-45). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61.
Sandler, L. (2001, August 31). Madison refocuses on light rail system plans; Milwaukee considers employing electric buses as cheaper alternative. Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, p. B2.
62.
Stanley, R. G. (2002). Use of flexible funds for transit under ISTEA and TEA-21 (Transit Cooperative Research Program Report J-7). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63.
Stanley, R. G. (2003). Characteristics of state funding for public transportation—2002. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Transit Cooperative Research Program.
64.
Taxes hiked to finance roads, mass transit. (1982). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 38, 317-320. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
65.
Taylor, B. D., & Kim, E. J. (2003, January). The triumph of politics over analysis in planning practice: A case study of the routing of the Wilshire subway in Los Angeles. Paper presented at 2003 annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
66.
Taylor, B. D., & Samples, K. (2002). Jobs, jobs, jobs: Political perceptions, economic reality, and capital bias in U.S. transit subsidy policy. Public Works Management and Policy, 6(4), 250-263.
67.
$375 million authorized for urban transit grants. (1964). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 20, 556-560. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
68.
Transport for London. (2003). Congestion charging: 6 months on. London: Author.
69.
Transportation law benefits those who held the purse strings. (1998). Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 54, 24-31. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
70.
Turner, D. (1996, March 14). NFTA skips latest bid for federal transit funds. The Buffalo News, p. B5.
71.
Ubbels, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2002). Unconventional funding of urban public transport. Transportation Research. Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(5), 317-329.
72.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). [Summary Files 1 and 3]. Available at www.census.gov
73.
U.S. Congress. (1982). Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982: Conference report. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.
74.
U.S. Congress. (1987). Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987: Conference report. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.
75.
U.S. Congress. (1991). Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991: Conference report. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.
76.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (1998). Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: A summary. Washington, DC: Author.
77.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). FTA needs to provide clear information and additional guidance on the new starts ratings process (Report to congressional committees). Washington, DC: Author.
Wachs, M. (1989). U.S. transit subsidy policy: In need of reform. Science, 244, 1545-1549.
80.
Wachs, M. (1995). The political context of transportation policy. In S. Hanson (Ed.), The geography of urban transportation (pp. 269-286). New York: Guilford.
81.
Wachs, M. (2003). Improving efficiency and equity in transportation finance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
82.
Weiner, E. (1999). Urban transportation planning in the United States: An historical overview. Westport, CT: Praeger.
83.
Werbel, R. A., & Haas, P. J. (2003). Voting outcomes of local tax ballot measures with a substantial rail transit component. Transportation Research Record-Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1799, 10-17.
