An integrated model of losses caused by infrastructure failures is presented together with an example application to interruptions in electric power. The model estimates how these losses affect the metropolitan economy. This measurement accounts for direct, indirect, and induced costs that can result from infrastructure failures. The procedure advances the information provided by transportation and activity system analysis techniques in ways that help capture the most important economic implications of infrastructure failures. Transportation network costs and origin-destination requirements are modeled endogenously and consistently. The overall research framework permits these full costs to be expressed in aggregate terms at a submetropolitan level as well as in a distributional sense.
Cho, S., Gordon, P., Moore, J. E., II, Richardson, H. W., Shinozuka, M., & Chang, S. E. (1999). Effect of earthquakes on urban highway infrastructure productivity: Vol. 2. Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large earthquake (Technical Rep. to the National Science Foundation, Award CMS 9633386 EHM). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, School of Policy, Planning & Development, and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/sppd/re-search/eqloss/
2.
Cho, S., Gordon, P., Moore, J. E., II, Richardson, H. W., Shinozuka, M., & Chang, S. E. (2001). Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake. Journal of Regional Science, 41, 39-65.
3.
Cho, S., Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., Moore, J. E., II, & Shinozuka, M. (2000). Analyzing transportation reconstruction network strategies: A full cost approach. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 12, 212-227.
4.
Gordon, P., Moore, J. E., II, & Richardson, H. W. (2002). Economic-engineering integrated models for earthquakes: Socioeconomic impacts (PEER Rep. 2002/19). Berkeley: University of California, College of Engineering, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
5.
Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., & Davis, W. (1998). Transport-related impacts of the Northridge earthquake. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1, 21-36.
6.
Haimes, Y. Y., & Jiang, P. (2001). Leontief-based models of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7(1), 1-12.
7.
Isard, W., & Kuenne, R. E. (1953). The impact of steel upon the greater New York-Philadelphia industrial region. Review of Economics and Statistics, 35, 289-301.
8.
Jiang, P., & Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Risk management for Leontief-based interdependent systems. Risk Analysis, 24(6), 1437-1451.
9.
Leontief, W., & Strout, A. (1963). Multiregional input-output analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Little, R. (2005). Tending the infrastructure commons: Ensuring the sustainability of our vital public systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1(4), 263-270.
11.
Little, R. G. (2002). Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1), 109-123.
12.
Moses, L. N. (1955). The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. American Economic Review, 45, 803-832.
13.
Okuyama, Y., Hewings, G. H. D., & Sonis, M. (1997). Interregional analysis of an unscheduled event. Paper presented at the 44th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Buffalo, NY.
14.
Richardson, H. W., Gordon, P., Jun, M.-J., & Kim, M. H. (1993). PRIDE and prejudice: The economic impacts of growth controls in Pasadena. Environment and Planning A, 25A, 987-1002.
15.
Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001, December). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependenceis. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 11-25.
16.
Rose, A., & Benavides, J. (1998). Regional economic impacts. In M. Shinozuka, A. Rose, & R. T. Eguchi (Eds.), Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes: An analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the New Madrid area. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER).
17.
Rose, A., Benavides, J., Chang, S. E., Szczesniak, P., & Lim, D.1997. The regional economic impact of an earthquake: direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 37, 437-458.
18.
Stevens, B. H. (1996). PC I-O (Version 7) [Computer software]. Heightstown, NJ: Regional Science Research Corporation.
19.
Stevens, B. H., Treyz G., & Lahr, M. (1983). A new technique for the construction of non-survey regional input-output models. International Regional Science Review, 8, 271-286.
20.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1996 (116th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
21.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1997). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1997 (117th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
22.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (1994). Census transportation planning package: Urban element (BTS-CD-15-31 Los Angeles, CA, special tabulations of the 1990 census data). Washington, DC: Author.
