Low-income groups use transit in greater numbers than others. There is little scholarship, however, about how they afford the fare. Using interviews with 25 low-income residents and 15 transportation and social service professionals, this study provides a complex description of fare affordability. It finds that low-income riders are often unable to pay for trips that fulfill daily necessities and discretionary purposes. They manage to travel by evading the fare, exploiting free transfers, forgoing goods, borrowing, and using free fare cards provided by agents of the welfare state. Professionals are largely unaware of the many ways that riders regularly compensate for low funds including the large-scale interventions made by the welfare state into public transportation. Fare evasion enforcement and pricing can pose challenges to low-income riders. By incorporating knowledge on the role that welfare plays in enabling low-income ridership, policy makers can expand access to transit for low-income riders.
AgrawalA. W.BlumenbergE.AbelS.PierceG.DarrahC. N. (2011). Getting around when you’re just getting by: The travel behavior and transportation expenditures of low-income adults. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
2.
AmadorF. J.GonzálezR. M.OrtúzarJ. D. (2008). On confounding preference heterogeneity and income effect in discrete choice models. Networks & Spatial Economics, 8, 97-108.
3.
American Public Transportation Association. (2010). 2010 public transportation fare database. Washington, DC: Matthew Dickens.
4.
American Public Transportation Association. (2015). 2015 public transportation fact book, Appendix A: Historical tables. Washington, DC: Matthew Dickens & John Neff.
5.
BalcombeR.MackettR.PaulleyN.PrestonJ.ShiresJ.TitheridgeH.WhiteP. (2004). The demand for public transport: A practical guide (TRL Report, TRL593). Retrieved from http://www.demandforpublictransport.co.uk/TRL593.pdf.
6.
BerubeA. (2014). All cities are not created unequal (Vol. 51). Washington, DC: Brookings.
7.
BlumenbergE. (2000). Moving welfare participants to work: Women, transportation, and welfare reform. Affilia, 15, 259-276.
8.
BlumenbergE. (2003). Transportation costs and economic opportunity among the poor. ACCESS Magazine, 1(23), 40-41. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4wd5n61m.
9.
BlumenbergE.HaasP. (2001). The travel behavior and needs of the poor: A study of welfare recipients in Fresno County. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
10.
BorndörferR.KarbsteinM.PfetschM. E. (2012). Models for fare planning in public transport. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 160, 2591-2605.
11.
CarruthersR.DickM.SaurkarA. (2005). Affordability of public transport in developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group Transport Sector Board.
ChappleK. (2001). Time to work: Job search strategies and commute time for women on welfare in San Francisco. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 155-173.
14.
CudahyB. J. (1990). Cash, tokens, and transfers: A history of urban mass transit in North America. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
15.
DelboscA.CurrieG. (2011). Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being. Transport Policy, 18, 555-562.
16.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
EdinK. J.ShaeferH. L. (2015). $2.00 a day: Living on almost nothing in America. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
18.
FanY.HuangA. (2011). How affordable is transportation? A context-sensitive framework. Minneapolis: Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota.
19.
GarrettM.TaylorB. (1999). Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 6-27.
20.
GiulianoG. (2003). Travel, location and race/ethnicity. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37, 351-372.
21.
HandyS.WestonL.MokhtarianP. L. (2005). Driving by choice or necessity?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 183-203.
22.
HickeyR.LuA.ReddyA. (2010). Using quantitative methods in equity and demographic analysis to inform transit fare restructuring decisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2144, 80-92.
23.
HoodC. (1995). 722 miles: The building of the subways and how they transformed New York. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Jara-DíazS. R.VidelaJ. (1989). Detection of income effect in mode choice: Theory and application. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 23, 393-400.
25.
KatzM. B. (1996). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
KirbyR. F. (1982). Pricing strategies for public transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48, 327-334.
27.
KuttyN. K. (2005). A new measure of housing affordability: Estimates and analytical results. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 113-142.
LitmanT. (2015). Transportation affordability evaluation and improvement strategies. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
31.
LovejoyK.HandyS. (2008). A case for measuring individuals’ access to private-vehicle travel as a matter of degrees: Lessons from focus groups with Mexican immigrants in California. Transportation, 35, 601-612.
32.
LovelyM. E.BrandD. (1982). Atlanta transit pricing study: Moderating impact of fare increases on the poor (Transportation Research Record, 857, 38-44).
33.
McCollomB. E.PrattR. H. (2004). Transit pricing and fares. In TCRP Report 95 Series, traveler response to transportation system changes (pp. 12.1-12.59). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
MokhtarianP. L.CaoX. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42, 204-228.
36.
PaulleyN.BalcombeR.MackettR.TitheridgeH.PrestonJ.WardmanM.. . . WhiteP. (2006). The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy, 13, 295-306.
37.
PollackS.WilliamsL.LopezR.LunaI. (2013). The toll of transportation. Boston, MA: Dukakis Center for Urban & Regional Policy, Northeastern University.
38.
PrestonJ. (2001). Integrating transport with socio-economic activity—A research agenda for the new millennium. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 13-24.
39.
PucherJ. (1981). Equity in transit finance: Distribution of transit subsidy benefits and costs among income classes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47, 387-407.
40.
PucherJ.RenneJ. L. (2003). Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), 49-77.
SanchezT. W. (2008). Poverty, policy, and public transportation. Transportation Research Part a Policy and Practice, 42, 833-841.
44.
SclarE. D.LönnrothM.WolmarC. (2014). Urban access for the 21st century: Finance and governance models for transport infrastructure. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
SerebriskyT.Gómez-LoboA.EstupiñánN.Muñoz-RaskinR. (2009). Affordability and subsidies in public urban transport: What do we mean, what can be done?Transport Reviews, 29, 715-739.
46.
ShenQ. (2000). Spatial and social dimensions of commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 68-82.
TaylorB. D.MillerD.IsekiH.FinkC. (2009). Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(1), 60-77.
49.
TaylorK. C.JonesE. C. (2012). Fair fare policies: Pricing policies that benefit transit-dependent riders. In JohnsonM. P. (Ed.), Community-based operations research (Vol. 167, pp. 251-272). New York, NY: Springer.
50.
TreffeisenA. (2013). Comparing rider costs using two ways of raising transit fares over the next 10 years. New York, NY: Independent Budget Office.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011–2013). American Community Survey three year estimates (2011-2013), tables DP05, DP03, DP02, B17012, and B11016.
54.
VenterC.BehrensR. (2005, July). Transport expenditure: Is the 10% policy benchmark appropriate?Paper presented at The 24th Southern African Transport Conference, Pretoria, South Africa.
55.
ViaurouxC. (2011). Pricing urban congestion: A structural random utility model with traffic anticipation. European Economic Review, 55, 877-902.
56.
WengrafT. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
