Several feminist theories predict that women's socioeconomic status, both absolute status and their status relative to men, influences the prevalence of violence against women, with some suggesting a positive correlation and others a negative one. Although each theory provides insight into the possible causal connection between women's status, gender inequality, and violence, empirical tests of these relationships are inconclusive. The present study addresses this issue by using a cross-sectional design with 2000 census and crime data to assess the impact of women's absolute status and gender inequality along educational, employment, income, and occupational dimensions and their risk of homicide victimization by intimate partners and nonintimates. The findings indicate that women's absolute status is significantly correlated with female homicide victimization rates by intimate partners. However, tests for equality of regression coefficients between the intimate and nonintimate partner models suggest that these differences may be attributed to random chance.
Bailey, W.C., & Peterson, R.D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 174-205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R.E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Brewer, V.E., & Smith, M.D. (1995). Gender inequality and rates of female homicide victimization across U.S. cities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 175-190.
4.
Britto, S., & Vieraitis, L.M. (2004). Race-specific gender equality and rape: A further test of feminist hypotheses. Critical Criminology, 12, 195-219.
5.
Browne, A., & Williams, K.R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender & Society , 7, 78-98.
6.
Browne, A., Williams, K.R., & Dutton, D.G. (1999). Homicide between intimate partners: A 20-year review. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide studies: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 149-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8.
Cameron, A.C., & Trivedi, P.K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Davis, J.L. (1975). The dialectics of rape. Ms, 3, 106-108.
10.
DeWees, M.A., & Parker, K.F. (2003). The political economy of urban homicide: Assessing the relative impact of gender inequality on sex-specific victimization. Violence and Victims, 18, 35-54.
11.
Eisenstein, Z.R. (1979). Developing a theory of capitalist patriarchy and socialist feminism. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 5-40). New York: Monthly Review Press.
12.
Ellis, L., & Beattie, C. (1983). The feminist explanation for rape: An empirical test. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 74-93.
13.
Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
14.
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92-106.
15.
Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F.C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37, 593-612.
16.
Gauthier, D.K., & Bankston, W.B. (1997). Gender equality and the sex ratio of intimate killing. Criminology, 35, 577-600.
17.
Goetting, A. (1995). Homicide in families and other special populations . New York: Springer.
18.
Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., & Trognon A. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models. Econometrica, 52, 701-720.
19.
Griffin, S. (1971). Rape, the all-American crime. Ramparts, 10, 26-35.
20.
Jaggar, A.M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. New Jersey: Rowan and Littlefield.
21.
Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce, and woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 2, 63-81.
22.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
MacKinnon, C.A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Martin, K., Vieraitis, L.M., & Britto, S. (2006, April 1). Gender equality and women's absolute status: A test of the feminist models of rape. Violence Against Women, 12(4), 321-339.
25.
Marvell, T.B., & Moody, C.E. (1999). Female and male homicide victimization rates: Comparing trends and regressors. Criminology, 47, 879-902.
26.
Messner, S.F., Deane, G., & Beaulieu, M. (2002). A log-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim-offender relationships. Criminology , 40, 457-479.
27.
Osgood, D.W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21-43.
28.
Pampel, F.C., & Williams, K.R. (2000). Intimacy and homicide: Compensating for missing data in the SHR. Criminology, 38, 661-680.
29.
Riger, S., & Gordon, M. (1981). The fear of rape: A study in social control. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 71-92.
30.
Russell, D. (1975). The politics of rape, the victim's perspective . New York: Stein & Day.
31.
Sanday, P.R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5-27.
32.
Schwendinger, J.R., & Schwendinger, H. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Stout, K. (1992). Intimate femicide: An ecological analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, pp. 29-50.
34.
Thomas, S.L. (1994). Gender and poverty. New York : Garland.
35.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1999). Uniform crime reporting program data (United States): Supplementary homicide reports, 1999 [Computer file]. Compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (ICPSR ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
36.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2000). Uniform crime reporting program data (United States): Supplementary homicide reports, 2000 [Computer file]. Compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (ICPSR ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
37.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2001). Uniform crime reporting program data (United States): Supplementary homicide reports, 2001 [Computer file]. Compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (ICPSR ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
38.
Vieraitis, L.M., Britto, S., & Kovandzic, T.V. (2007). The impact of women's status and gender inequality on female homicide rates. Feminist Criminology , 2, 1-17.
39.
Vieraitis, L.M., & Williams, M.R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities: A racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8, 35-63.
40.
Whaley, R.B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15, 531-555.
