This study examines whether changes made to the investigation procedures within the Rochester Police Department’s homicide unit have an effect on homicide clearance net of theoretically significant variables related to victim and police devaluation, event characteristic, and victim lifestyle. It examines 132 homicides investigated by the homicide unit over 4 years consisting of the pre-intervention period and post-intervention period. It is hypothesized that investigation tactics will affect the odds of clearance, even after controlling for other theoretically relevant variables. The findings support this hypothesis, suggesting that the approaches and tactics police departments implement within their investigative units are important.
AlderdenM. A.LaveryT. A. (2007). Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 11, 115-132.
2.
ArmourM. P. (2002). Journey of family members of homicide victims: A qualitative study of their post-homicide experience. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 372-382.
3.
BlackD. (1976). The behavior of law. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
4.
BorgM. J.ParkerK. F. (2001). Mobilizing law in urban areas: The social structure of homicide clearance rates. Law & Society Review, 35, 435-466. doi:10.2307/3185409
CarterD. L.CarterJ. G. (2016). Effective police homicide investigations: Evidence from seven cities with high clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 20, 150-176.
CloningerD. O.SartoriusL. C. (1979). Crime rates, clearance rates and enforcement effort: The case of Houston, Texas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38, 389-402.
9.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187-220.
10.
CroninJ. M.MurphyG. R.SpahrL. L.ToliverJ. I.WegerR. E. (2007). Promoting effective homicide investigations. Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, D.C.
11.
DeLisiM.KosloskiA.SweenM.HachmeisterE.MooreM.DruryA. (2010). Murder by numbers: Monetary costs imposed by a sample of homicide offenders. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 501-513. doi:10.1080/14789940903564388
12.
EckJ. E. (1992). Criminal investigation. In CordnerG.HaleD. (Eds.), What works in policing? Operations and administration examined (pp. 19-34). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
GeberthV. J. (1990). Practical homicide investigation: Tactics, procedures, and forensic techniques. New York, NY: Elsevier.
15.
HawkS. R.DabneyD. A. (2014). Are all cases treated equal? Using Goffman’s frame analysis to understand how homicide detectives orient to their work. The British Journal of Criminology, 54, 1129-1147. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu056
16.
HorvathF.MeesigR. T.LeeY. H. (2001). A national survey of police policies and practices regarding the criminal investigation process: Twenty-five years after Rand. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17.
HosmerD. G.LemeshowS.MayS. (2008). Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time-to-event data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
18.
HoughR.McCorkleK. (2016). American homicide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
JiaoA. Y. (2007). Explaining homicide clearance: An analysis of Chicago homicide data 1965–1995. Criminal Justice Studies, 20, 3-14.
20.
KeelT. G.JarvisJ. P.MuirheadY. E. (2009). An exploratory analysis of factors affecting homicide investigations: Examining the dynamics of murder clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 13, 50-68.
21.
KlingerD. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306.
22.
LeeC. (2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 527-534.
23.
LitwinK. J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 327-351.
24.
LitwinK. J.XuY. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11, 94-114.
25.
MancikA. M.ParkerK. F.WilliamsK. R. (2018). Neighborhood context and homicide clearance: Estimating the effects of collective efficacy. Homicide Studies, 22, 188-213.
26.
MarchéG. E. (1994). The production of homicide solutions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53, 385-401.
27.
McEwenT. (2011). The role and impact of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
McEwenT. (2013). Executive summary evaluation of the phoenix homicide clearance project. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
29.
MiletichJ. J. (2003). Homicide investigation: An introduction. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
30.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2009). To know the unknown: The decline in homicide clearance rates, 1980–2000. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 141-158. doi:10.1177/0734016809348360
31.
PampelF. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
PetersenN. (2017). Neighbourhood context and unsolved murders: The social ecology of homicide investigations. Policing and Society, 27, 372-392.
33.
PizarroJ. M. (2017). Gang homicides in the United States: What we know and future research directions. In BrookmanF.MaguireE. R.MaguireM. (Eds.), The handbook of homicide (pp. 73-88). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
34.
PuckettJ. L.LundmanR. J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 171-193.
35.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ. P. (2013). Beyond the social production of homicide rates: Extending social disorganization theory to explain homicide case outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 30, 983-1014.
36.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ. P.RiedelM. (2008). Clearing murders: Is it about time?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 142-162.
37.
RiedelM. (2008). Homicide arrest clearances: A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 2, 1145-1164. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00130.x
38.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11, 82-93.
39.
RobertsA.LyonsC. J. (2011). Hispanic victims and homicide clearance by arrest. Homicide Studies, 15, 48-73. doi:10.1177/1088767910397278
40.
RydbergJ.PizarroJ. M. (2014). Victim lifestyle as a correlate of homicide clearance. Homicide Studies, 18, 342-362.
41.
SchroederD. A.WhiteM. D. (2009). Exploring the use of DNA evidence in homicide investigations: Implications for detective work and case clearance. Police Quarterly, 12, 319-342.
42.
StelfoxP. (2011). Criminal investigation: Filling the skills gap in leadership, management, and supervision. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 5, 15-22. doi:10.1093/police/paq055
43.
WellfordC. F.CroninJ. M.BrandlS.BynumT.EversenT.GaleriaS. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multistate study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.
44.
WorrallJ. L. (2016). Investigative resources and crime clearances: A group-based trajectory approach. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 155-175.
45.
XuY. (2008). Characteristics of homicide events and the decline in homicide clearance: A longitudinal approach to the dynamic relationship, Chicago 1966-1995. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 453-479. doi:10.1177/0734016808320693
