In a comprehensive meta-analysis of 167 studies, the authors found that sequential priming tasks were significantly associated with behavioral measures (r = .28) and with explicit attitude measures (r = .20). Priming tasks continued to predict behavior after controlling for the effects of explicit attitudes. These results generalized across a variety of study domains and methodological variations. Within-study moderator analyses revealed that priming tasks have good specificity, only predicting behavior and explicit measures under theoretically expected conditions. Together, these results indicate that sequential priming—one of the earliest methods of investigating implicit social cognition—continues to be a valid tool for the psychological scientist.
*AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28.
2.
*AkramiN.EkehammarB. (2005). The association between implicit and explicit prejudice: The moderating role of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 361-366.
3.
*AllenT. J.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2010). Social context and the self-regulation of implicit bias. Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, 13, 137-149.
4.
*AustinJ.SmithJ. (2008). Drinking for negative reinforcement: The semantic priming of alcohol concepts. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1572-1580.
5.
*BackM.KrauseS.HirschmüllerS.StopferJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. (2009). Unraveling the three faces of self-esteem: A new information-processing sociometer perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 933-937.
6.
*BanajiM. R.HardinC. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
7.
*Bar-AnanY. (2010). Strategic modification of the evaluative priming effect does not reduce its sensitivity to uncontrolled evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1101-1104.
8.
BarghJ. A. (1992). Does subliminality matter to social psychology? Awareness of the stimulus versus awareness of its influence. In BornstenR. F.PittmanT. S. (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 236-255). New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
*BarghJ.RaymondP.PryorJ.StrackF. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
10.
*BessennoffG. R.ShermanJ. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329-353.
11.
BlantonH.JaccardJ. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27-41.
12.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
13.
*BossonJ. K.SwannW. B.PennebakerJ. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
14.
*BrochuP. M.GawronskiB.EssesV. M. (2011). The integrative prejudice framework and different forms of weight prejudice: An analysis and expansion. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 429-444.
15.
*ButzD. A.PlantE. A.DoerrC. (2007). Liberty and justice for all? The implications of exposure to the United States flag for intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 396-408.
16.
*CarraroL.GawronskiB.CastelliL. (2010). Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 453-470.
17.
*CesarioJ.PlaksJ. E.HigginsE. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 893-910.
18.
ChaikenE.TropeY. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
ChenM.BarghJ. A. (1997). Non-conscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541-560.
20.
*CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.
21.
*CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC.WittenbrinkB.SadlerM. S.KeeseeT. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006-1023.
22.
*CorrellJ.UrlandG. R.ItoT. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 120-128.
*CunninghamW. A.PreacherK. J.BanajiM. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
27.
*CustersR.AartsH. (2007). In search of the nonconscious sources of goal pursuit: Accessibility and positive affective valence of the goal state. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 312-318.
28.
*DannlowskiU.KerstingA.Lalee-MentzelJ.DongesU.AroltV.SuslowT. (2006). Subliminal affective priming in clinical depression and comorbid anxiety: A longitudinal investigation. Psychiatry Research, 143, 63-75.
29.
*DannlowskiU.OhrmannP.BauerJ.KugelH.AroltV.HeindelW.. . . SuslowT (2007). Amygdala reactivity to masked negative faces is associated with automatic judgmental bias in major depression: A 3 T fMRI study. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 32, 423-429.
30.
*DegnerJ.WenturaD. (2009). Not everybody likes the thin and despises the fat: One’s weight matters in the automatic activation of weight-related social evaluations. Social Cognition, 27, 202-221.
31.
*DegnerJ.WenturaD.GniewoszB.NoackP. (2007). Hostility-related prejudice against Turks in adolescents: Masked affective priming allows for a differentiation of automatic prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 245-256.
32.
De HouwerJ.GeldofT.De BruyckerE. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228-239.
33.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.SpruytA. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85-91.
34.
*DePrinceA.CombsM.ShanahanM. (2009). Automatic relationship-harm associations and interpersonal trauma involving close others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 163-171.
35.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotyping and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
36.
*DijksterhuisA.AartsH.BarghJ. A.van KnippenbergA. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531-544.
37.
DovidioJ. F.EvansN.TylerR. B. (1986). Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22-37.
38.
*DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-68.
39.
*DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
40.
DraineS. C.GreenwaldA. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286-303.
41.
DuBoisC. N. (1963). Time Magazine’s fingerprints’ study. Proceedings of the 9th Conference, Advertising Research Foundation. New York, NY: Advertising Research Foundation.
42.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383-386.
43.
EriksenB. A.EriksenC. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
44.
*EvesF.ScottE.HoppéR.FrenchD. (2007). Using the affective priming paradigm to explore the attitudes underlying walking behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 571-585.
45.
*FagundesC. P. (2011). Implicit negative evaluations about ex-partner predicts break-up adjustment: The brighter side of dark cognitions. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 164-173.
46.
FazioR. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York, NY: Academic Press.
47.
*FazioR. H.HildenL. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 538-549.
48.
*FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
49.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
50.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
51.
*FergusonM. (2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 596-611.
52.
*FergusonM. (2008). On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1268-1294.
53.
*FergusonM.BarghJ. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557-572.
54.
*FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296-309.
55.
*FrieseM.HofmannW. (2009). Control me, or I will control you: Impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 795-805.
56.
FrieseM.HofmannW.SchmittM. (2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285-338.
57.
*FringsC.WenturaD. (2003). Who is watching Big Brother? TV consumption predicted by masked affective priming. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 779-791.
58.
GaertnerS. L.McLaughlinJ. P. (1983). Racial stereotypes: Associations and ascriptions of positive and negative characteristics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 23-30.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
*GawronskiB.LeBelE. P. (2008). Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1355-1361.
72.
*GawronskiB.PetersK. R.BrochuP. M.StrackF. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648-665.
*GawronskiB.WaltherE. (2008). The TAR effect: When the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1276-1289.
*GawronskiB.YehY.What drives priming effects in the affect misattribution procedure? Underlying mechanisms and new applications. Unpublished manuscript.
80.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
81.
GreenwaldA.PoehlmanT.UhlmannE.BanajiM. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
82.
*GreenwaldA. G.SmithC. T.SriramN.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2009). Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 241-253.
83.
*L.CrombezG.HermansD.VanderstraetenG. (2003). Implicit attitude toward pictures of back-stressing activities in pain-free subjects and patients with low back pain: An affective priming study. European Journal of Pain, 7, 33-42.
84.
*GuinoteA.WillisG. B.MartelottaC. (2010). Social power increases implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 299-307.
85.
*HofmannW.BaumertA. (2010). Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgment: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 522-535.
86.
HofmannW.GawronskiB.GschwendnerT.LeH.SchmittM. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
87.
*HofmannW.van KoningsburggenG. M.StroebeW.RamanathanS.AartsH. (2010). As pleasure unfolds: Hedonic responses to tempting food. Psychological Science, 21, 1863-1870.
88.
*ImhoffR.BanseR. (2009). Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice: The case of secondary anti-semitism. Psychological Science, 20, 1443-1447.
89.
*ImhoffR.BanseR. (2011). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward ex-partners differentially predict breakup adjustment. Personal Relationships, 18, 427-438.
90.
*ImhoffR.SchmidtA. F.BernhardtJ.DierksmeierA.BanseR. (2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 676-690.
91.
KarpinskiA.HiltonJ. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774-778.
92.
*KawakamiK.DovidioJ. F. (2001). The reliability of implicit stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 212-225.
93.
KinseyA. C.PomeroyW. B.MartinC. E.GebhardP. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
94.
*KuntsmanJ.PlantE. A. (2008). Racing to help: Racial bias in high-emergency situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1499-1510.
95.
*LambertA. J.PayneB. K.RamseyS.ShafferL. M. (2005). On the predictive validity of implicit attitude measures: The moderating effect of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 114-128.
96.
*LandauM. J.VessM.ArndtJ.RothschildZ. K.SullivanD.AtchleyR. A. (2011). Embodied metaphor and the “true” self: Priming entity expansion and protection influences intrinsic self-expressions in self-perceptions and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 79-87.
*LeBelE. P.GawronskiB.Ingroup favoritism: Personal threat project. Unpublished manuscript.
100.
*LeiboldJ.McConnellA. (2004). Women, sex, hostility, power, and suspicion: Sexually aggressive men’s cognitive associations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 256-263.
101.
*LentonA. P.BlairI. V.HastieR. (2001). Illusions of gender: Stereotypes evoke false memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 3-14.
102.
*MarshK. L.JonnsonB. T.Scott-SheldonL. A. J. (2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 161-175.
103.
*MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D.GaitherG. A.HeinertN. J. (2006). A secret attraction or defensive loathing? Homophobia, defense, and implicit cognition. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 377-394.
104.
MeyerD. E.SchvaneveldtR. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
105.
*MoldenD. (2012). Symbolic racism and implicit prejudice. Unpublished manuscript.
106.
MoorsA.SpruytA.De HouwerJ. (2010). In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit: Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 19-35). New York, NY: Guilford.
107.
*MoskowitzG. B.GollwitzerP. M.WaselW.SchallB. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.
108.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
109.
MuschJ.KlauerK. C. (2001). Locational uncertainty moderates affective priming effects in the evaluative decision task. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 167-188.
110.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106, 226-254.
*OikawaH.OikawaM.AobayashiT. (2009). Affect misattribution procedure as an implicit goal measure: Implicit and explicit goals and daily behavior. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 192-200.
113.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653-667.
114.
*OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Trait inferences as a function of automatically-activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1-11.
115.
*OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2007). Discordant evaluations of Blacks affect nonverbal behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1214-1224.
116.
*OttenS.WenturaD. (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Evidence from affective priming tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049-1071.
117.
*PapiesE. K.StroebeW.AartsH. (2009). Who likes it more? Restrained eaters’ implicit attitudes toward food. Appetite, 53, 279-287.
118.
*ParkB.SmithJ. A.CorrellJ. (2010). The persistence of implicit behavioral associations for moms and dads. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 809-815.
119.
*PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
120.
*PayneB. K. (2005). Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive control modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 488-503.
121.
*PayneB. K.BurkleyM.StokesM. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16-31.
122.
*PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
*PayneB. K.GovorunO.ArbuckleN. L. (2008). Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking?Cognition and Emotion, 22, 238-271.
125.
*PayneB. K.HallD.CameronC. D.BisharaA. (2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1397-1408.
126.
*PayneB. K.KrosnickJ. A.PasekJ.LelkesY.AkhtarO.TompsonT. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 367-374.
127.
*PayneB. K.McClernonJ. F.DobbinsI. G. (2007). Automatic affective responses to smoking cues. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 400-409.
128.
PeruginiM.RichetinJ.ZogmaisterC. (2010). Prediction of behavior. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 255-277). New York, NY: Guilford.
129.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657-686.
130.
PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
131.
ReingoldE.MerikleP. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 563-575.
132.
*RoefsA.HermanC. P.MacLeodC. M.SmuldersF. T. Y.JansenA. (2005). At first sight: How do restrained eaters evaluate high-fat palatable foods?Appetite, 44, 103-114.
133.
RosenthalR. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 638-641.
134.
RothermundK.WenturaD. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
135.
SawyerH. G. (1961). The meaning of numbers. Speech before the American Association of Advertising Agencies.
136.
*SnowdenR. J.WichterJ.GrayN. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the Implicit Association Task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 558-565.
137.
*SpaldingL. R.HardinC. D. (1999). Unconscious unease and self-handicapping: Behavioral consequences of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 10, 535-539.
138.
*SpruytA.HermansD.De HouwerJ.VandekerckhoveJ.EelenP. (2007). On the predictive validity of indirect attitude measures: Prediction of consumer choice behavior on the basis of affective priming in the picture-picture naming task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 599-610.
139.
*SritharanR.HeilpernK.WilburC. J.GawronskiB. (2010). I think I like you: Spontaneous and deliberate evaluations of potential romantic partners in an online dating context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1062-1077.
140.
SteigerJ. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
141.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
142.
*Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2001). On the origins of racial attitudes: Correlates of childhood experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 162-175.
143.
*Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relationship between automatically activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 170-182.
144.
*Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2006). Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 698-705.
WebbE. J.CampbellD. T.SchwartzR. D.SechrestL. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Non-reactive research in the social sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
147.
*WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 295-302.
148.
*WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373-395.
149.
WenturaD.DegnerJ. (2010). A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 95-115). New York, NY: Guilford.
150.
*WenturaD.GreveW. (2004). Who wants to be . . . erudite? Everyone! Evidence for automatic adaptation of trait definitions. Social Cognition, 22, 30-53.
151.
*WenturaD.GreveW. (2005). Assessing the structure of self-concept: Evidence for self-immunization processes by using a sentence priming task. Self and Identity, 4, 193-211.
152.
*WenturaD.KulfanekM.GreveW. (2005). Masked affective priming by name letters: Evidence for a correspondence of explicit and implicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 654-663.
153.
*WittenbrinkB.JuddC.ParkB. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815-827.
154.
*WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (2001). Evaluative versus conceptual judgments in automatic stereotyping and prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 244-252.
155.
*WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.
156.
*ZhangY.FishbachA.KruglanskiA. W. (2007). The dilution model: How additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 389-401.
157.
*ZurbriggenE. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power–sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559-581.
