Empowerment theory provides both a value orientation for community-based research and practice, and a conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating interventions. One critical question in empowerment theory involves whether a reciprocal (bidirectional) relationship exists between community participation (CP) and psychological empowerment (PE). This study applied structural equation modeling (SEM) with two waves of survey data from a cross-lagged panel design to test reciprocal and unidirectional causal relations between latent variables representing CP and PE. Participants (n = 474) were randomly selected neighborhood residents and organizational members from the United States. Four models were tested using SEM: (a) a baseline model with autoregressive paths, (b) a model with autoregressive effects and CP predicting future PE, (c) a model with autoregressive effects and PE predicting future CP, and (d) a fully cross-lagged model. Results indicated that CP influenced future PE; however, reciprocal causality was not found to occur between the variables. Implications of the study for empowerment theory and community-based practice are described, and directions for future research discussed.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
2.
BanduraA. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
3.
BeckerA. B.IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.KlemL. (2002). Predictors of perceived control among African American women in Detroit: Exploring empowerment as a multilevel construct. Health Education & Behavior, 29, 699-715.
4.
BekkersR. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454.
5.
BookerV. K.RobinsonJ. G.KayB. J.NajeraL. G.StewartG. (1997). Changes in empowerment: Effects of participation in a lay health promotion program. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 452-464.
6.
ChavisD.WandersmanA. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55-81.
7.
ChristensB. D.HanlinC. E.SpeerP. W. (2007). Getting the social organism thinking: Strategy for systems change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 229-238.
8.
ClaryE. G.SnyderM. (2002). Community involvement: Opportunities and challenges in socializing adults to participate in society. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 581-591.
9.
CohenA.VigodaE.SamorlyA. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22, 727-757.
10.
CornishF. (2006). Empowerment to participate: A case study of participation by Indian sex workers in HIV prevention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 301-315.
11.
de CharmsR. (1968). Personal causation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
Foster-FishmanP. G.PierceS. J.Van EgerenL. A. (2009). Who participates and why: Building a process model of citizen participation. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 550-569.
13.
GutierrezL. M. (1995). Understanding the empowerment process: Does consciousness make a difference?Social Work Research, 19, 229-237.
14.
HoldenD. J.EvansW. D.HinnantL. W.MesseriP. (2005). Modeling psychological empowerment among youth involved in local tobacco control efforts. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 264-278.
15.
HoldenD. J.MesseriP.EvansW. D.CrankshawE.Ben-DaviesM. (2004). Conceptualizing youth empowerment within tobacco control. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 548-563.
16.
HugheyJ.PetersonN. A.LoweJ. B.OprescuF. (2008). Empowerment and sense of community: Clarifying their relationship in community organizations. Health Education & Behavior, 35, 651-663.
17.
IsraelB. A.CheckowayB.SchultzA.ZimmermanM. A. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 149-170.
18.
ItzhakyH.SchwartzC. (1998). Empowering the disabled: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 301-310.
19.
ItzhakyH.YorkA. S. (2000). Sociopolitical control and empowerment: An extended replication. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 407-415.
20.
KiefferC. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. In RappaportJ.SwiftC.HessR. (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 9-36). New York, NY: Haworth.
21.
KundiM. (2006). Causality and the interpretation of epidemiologic evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 969-974.
22.
Le BosseY.LavalleeM.LacerteD.DubeN.NadeauJ.PorcherE.VandetteL. (1999). Is community participation empirical evidence for psychological empowerment? Distinction between passive and active participation. Journal of Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 8, 59-82.
23.
MarkhamW. T.BonjeanC. M. (1995). Community orientations of higher-status women volunteers. Social Forces, 73, 1553-1571.
24.
MatonK. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 4-21.
25.
MillerR. L.ShinnM. (2005). Learning from communities: Overcoming difficulties in dissemination of prevention and promotion efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 169-183.
26.
MuhlbergerP. (2000). Moral reasoning effects on political participation. Political Psychology, 21, 667-695.
27.
OhmerM. L. (2007). Citizen participation in neighborhood organizations and its relationship to volunteers’ self- and collective efficacy and sense of community. Social Work Research, 31, 109-120.
28.
PerkinsD. D.ZimmermanM. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 569-579.
29.
PetersonN. A.LoweJ. B.HugheyJ.ReidR. J.ZimmermanM. A.SpeerP. W. (2006). Measuring the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment: Confirmatory factor analysis of the sociopolitical control scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 287-297.
30.
PetersonN. A.ReidR. J. (2003). Paths to psychological empowerment in an urban community: Sense of community and citizen participation in substance abuse prevention activities. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 25-38.
31.
PetersonN. A.SpeerP. W. (2000). Linking organizational characteristics to psychological empowerment: Contextual issues in empowerment theory. Administration in Social Work, 24(4), 39-58.
32.
RappaportJ. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121-148.
33.
RichR.EdelsteinM.HallmanW. K.WandersmanA. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657-676.
34.
RotterJ. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. American Psychologist, 45, 489-493.
35.
RussellS. T.MuracoA.SubramaniamA.LaubC. (2009). Youth empowerment and high school gay-straight alliances. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 891-903.
36.
SchulzA. J.IsraelB. A.ZimmermanM. A.CheckowayB. N. (1995). Empowerment as a multi-level construct: Perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Education Research, 10, 309-327.
37.
SpeerP. W.HugheyJ. (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 729-748.
38.
SpeerP. W.PetersonN. A. (2000). Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. Social Work Research, 24, 109-118.
39.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 601-629.
40.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838.
42.
ZimmermanM. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In RappaportJ.SeidmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). New York, NY: Plenum.
43.
ZimmermanM. A.IsraelB. A.SchulzA.CheckowayB. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 707-727.
44.
ZimmermanM. A.ZahniserJ. H. (1991). Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a sociopolitical control scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 189-204.
