Housing market distortions from the mortgage interest deduction (MID) typically focus on a single choice measure such as home size or self-reported amount of debt on a new mortgage. We estimate the amount of mortgage interest deducted on federal tax returns to capture the full range of housing market distortions from the MID. Our primary results show that for every one percentage point increase in the tax rate that applies to deductibility, the amount of mortgage interest deducted increases by US$303 to US$590. Empirical estimates imply elasticities of mortgage interest deducted with respect to the after-tax cost of housing between −0.78 and −1.62, and deadweight loss estimates ranging from 16 to 36 percent of MID tax expenditure.
AndersonJohnClemensJeffreyHansonAndrew. 2007. “Capping the Mortgage Interest Deduction.”National Tax Journal60:769–85.
2.
AngristJoshuaPischkeJörn–Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
DunskyRobertFollainJames. 1997. “The Demand for Mortgage Debt and the Income Tax.”Journal of Housing Research8:155–99.
4.
DunskyRobertFollainJames. 2000. “Tax-induced Portfolio Reshuffling: The Case of the Mortgage Interest Deduction.”Real Estate Economics28:683–718.
5.
Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. 2011. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government Fiscal Year 2012. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
FeldsteinMartin. 1995. “The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act.”Journal of Political Economy103:551–72.
8.
FeldsteinMartin. 1999. “Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax.”Review of Economics and Statistics81:674–80.
GlaeserEdwardShapiroJesse. 2003. “The Benefits of the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction.”Tax Policy and the Economy17:37–82.
11.
GreenRichardVandellKerry. 1999. “Giving Households Credit: How Changes in the U.S. Tax Code Could Promote Homeownership.”Regional Science and Urban Economics29:419–44.
12.
HansonAndrew. 2012a. “Size of Home, Homeownership, and the Mortgage Interest Deduction.”Journal of Housing Economics21:195–210.
13.
HansonAndrew. 2012b. “Limiting the Mortgage Interest Deduction by Size of Home: Effects on the User Cost and Price of Housing across Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Housing Research23:1–20.
14.
HansonAndrew. 2012c. “The Incidence of the Mortgage Interest Deduction: Evidence from the Market for Home Purchase Loans.”Public Finance Review40:339–59.
15.
HarbergerArnold. 1964. “Taxation, Resource Allocation, and Welfare.” In The Role of Direct and Indirect Taxes in the Federal Revenue System, edited by DueJ., 25–80. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HendershottPatricPryceGwilym. 2006. “The Sensitivity of Homeowner Leverage to the Deductibility of Home Mortgage Interest.”Journal of Urban Economics60:50–68.
17.
HimmelbergCharlesMayerChristopherSinaiTodd. 2005. “Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals and Misperceptions.”Journal of Economic Perspectives19:67–92.
18.
HSH (Howard/Stein-Hudson) Associates. 2007. National Monthly Mortgage Statistics: 2007. Accessed April 25, 2012. http://www.hsh.com/natmo2007.html.
19.
JonesLawrence. 1995. “Net Wealth, Marginal Tax Rates and the Demand for Home Mortgage Debt.”Regional Science and Urban Economics25:297–322.
20.
LingDavidMcGillGary. 1998. “Evidence on the Demand for Mortgage Debt by Owner-Occupants.”Journal of Urban Economics44:391–414.
21.
PoterbaJames. 1984. “Tax Subsidies to Owner-occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach.”Quarterly Journal of Economics99:729–52.
22.
PoterbaJames. 1992. “Taxation and Housing: Old Questions, New Answers.”American Economic Review82:237–42.
23.
PoterbaJamesSinaiTodd. 2008. “Tax Expenditures for Owner-occupied Housing: Deductions for Property Taxes and Mortgage Interest and the Exclusion of Imputed Rental Income.”American Economic Review98:84–89.
24.
PoterbaJamesSinaiTodd. 2011. “Revenue Costs and Incentive Effects of the Mortgage Interest Deduction for Owner-occupied Housing.”National Tax Journal64:531–64.
25.
RosenHarvey. 1979a. “Housing Decisions and the U.S. Income Tax: An Econometric Analysis.”Journal of Public Economics11:1–23.
26.
RosenHarvey. 1979b. “Owner Occupied Housing and the Federal Income Tax: Estimates and Simulations.”Journal of Urban Economics6:247–66.
27.
RosenHarvey. 1985. “Housing Subsidies: Effects on Housing Decisions, Efficiency, and Equity.” In Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 1, edited by AuerbachAlanFeldsteinMartin, 375–420. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
28.
SmithLawrenceRosenKennethFallisGeorge. 1988. “Recent Developments in Economic Models of Housing Markets.”Journal of Economic Literature26:29–64.
29.
WhiteHalbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.”Econometrica48:817–38.
30.
WinshipChristopherRadbillLarry. 1994. “Sampling Weights and Regression Analysis.”Sociological Methods and Research23:230–57.
