This call to arms reminds interpreters and academics to cooperate and collaborate. Historic interpreters and historians often misunderstand and resent each other. Tesdahl suggests that each group aims to inform and inspire the public and misses out if they do not work together to accomplish this. The author harkens back to an earlier definition of the term amateur suggesting that professional interpreters and historians should meet their standards but should do history passionately because they love it. If they do, a more informative, engaging, and collaborative history that includes all audiences will emerge.
HorwitzT. (1998). Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War.New York: Pantheon Books.
5.
KruglerJ. (2013). Creating Old World Wisconsin: The Struggle to Build an Outdoor History Museum of Ethnic Architecture.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6.
MagelssenS., & Justice-MalloyR. (2011). Enacting History.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
7.
MastE., VogelM., & LopezL. (Summer 2014). The Period of Significance is Now.Forum Journal, 28.4, 43–51.
8.
NovickP.That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
PaceD. (October 2004). The Amateur in the Operating Room: History and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.American Historical Review, 109.4, 1171–1192.
10.
RoseJ.Interpreting Difficult History at Museums and Historic Sites.Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
11.
TildenF. (1957). Interpreting Our Heritage.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
