Research communication and knowledge networking contribute to the capacity building of a scientific community. Tourism and hospitality research associations are characterized by producers and users of multidisciplinary field research, and are exemplars of an applied social scientific community. This study focuses on the role of research associations in the capacity building of an applied research community and consequently in the fostering of community growth. Following an embedded single case design, the study examines the Travel and Tourism Research Association as an instance of such a community. The research reports on community perceptions of the association in the capacity building of the membership community. Results of the study are discussed in the contexts of science communication, knowledge networks, and scientific community capacity and have practical implications for the planning and management of applied research associations.
Ben-David, J. ( 1964). Scientific growth: A sociological view. Minerva, 2, 455-476.
2.
Ben-David, J., & Collins, R. ( 1966). Social factors in the origin of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31, 451-465.
3.
Blakeman, P. ( 2005, November). Notes on the academic roundtable. Paper presented at the TTRA Canada Conference, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
4.
Bosselman, R. ( 2002). Foundations of a professional organization: The birth of International CHRIE. Retrieved from http://www.chrie.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3296
5.
Caplan, N. ( 1979). The two communities theory and knowledge utilization . American Behavioral Scientist, 22, 459-470.
6.
Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R. ( 1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Council of Australian Universities in Tourism and Hospitality Education. (2005). Sharing tourism knowledge: Evaluation feedback. Retrieved from http://www.cauthe.com.au/newConference.htm
8.
Chaskin, R., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. ( 2001). Community capacity and capacity building: A definitional framework. In R. Chaskin, P. Brown, S. Venkatesh & A. Vidal (Eds.), Building community capacity (pp. 7-26). New York, NY: Aldine.
9.
Collins, H. ( 1974). The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks . Science Studies, 4, 165-185.
10.
Crane, D. ( 1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the "invisible college". American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352.
11.
Crane, D. ( 1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Druckman, D. ( 2000a). The social scientist as consultant. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1565-1577.
13.
Druckman, D. ( 2000b). Frameworks, techniques, and theory: Contributions of research consulting in social sciences. American Behavioral Scientists, 43, 1635-1666.
14.
Dunn, W. ( 1980). The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: An exploratory case survey. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 515-536.
15.
Ennamorato, M. ( 2003). Key findings from the TTRA Canada member survey. Retrieved from http://ttracanada.ca/en/membership/membership_survey_results.pdf
16.
Fothergill, A. ( 2000). Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners . Natural Hazards Review, 1, 91-98.
17.
Frechtling, D. ( 2004). Assessment of the tourism/hospitality journals’ role in knowledge transfer: An exploratory study. Journal of Travel Research, 43, 100-107.
18.
Garvey, W., & Griffith, B. ( 1967). Scientific communication as a social system. Science, 157, 1011-1016.
19.
Granovetter, M. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
20.
Griffith, B., & Mullins, N. ( 1972). Coherent social groups in scientific change. Science, 177, 959-964.
21.
Hagstrom, W. ( 1964). Traditional and modern forms of scientific network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 241-263.
22.
Hagstrom, W. ( 1965). The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.
23.
Hall, M., Williams, A., & Lew, A. ( 2004). Tourism: Conceptualizations, institutions, and issues . In A. Lew, M. Hall, & A. Williams (Eds.), A companion to tourism (pp. 3-21). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24.
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. ( 2005). Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer. The Milbank Quarterly, 83, 299-321.
25.
Jafari, J. ( 1977). Editor’s page. Annals of Tourism Research, 5, 6-11.
26.
Jafari, J., & Ritchie, J.R.B. (1981). Toward a framework for tourism education: Problems and prospects. Annals of Tourism Research, 8, 13-33.
27.
Kadushin, C. ( 1966). On social circles in urban life. American Sociological Review, 31, 786-802.
28.
Kadushin, C. ( 1968). Power, influence and social circles. American Sociological Review, 33, 685-699.
29.
Kuhn, T. ( 1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Kuhn, T. ( 1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
31.
Lang, J. ( 2004). Social context and social capital as enablers of knowledge integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 89-105.
32.
Levy, D., & Nail, P. ( 1993). Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization . Genetic, Social and General Psychology, 119, 233-284.
33.
Liebowitz, J. ( 2005). Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 76-86.
34.
March, J. ( 2004). Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1, 5-22.
35.
Marsden, P. ( 1998). Memetics and social contagion: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2, 171-185.
36.
Merton, R. ( 1957). Priorities in scientific discoveries: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22, 635-659.
37.
Mulkay, M. ( 1977). Sociology of the scientific research community. In I. Spiegel-Rosing & D. Price (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 93-148). London, England: Sage.
38.
Mullins, N. ( 1968). The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. American Sociological Review, 33, 786-797.
39.
Mullins, N. ( 1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10, 51-82.
40.
Oppermann, M., & Chon, K. ( 1997). Convention participation decision-making process. Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 178-191.
41.
Price, D. ( 1963). Little science, big science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
42.
Reid, L., & Smith, S. ( 1998). Connecting the research and business communities to ensure profitability. In M. Joppe (Ed.), Reviving the engines: Making profitable destinations ( TTRA Canada Conference Proceedings, pp. 174-178). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: TTRA Canada.
43.
Schonstrom, M. ( 2005). Creating knowledge networks: Lessons from practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 17-29.
44.
Schott, T. ( 1988). International influence in science: Beyond center and periphery. Social Science Research, 17, 219-238.
45.
Scott, J. ( 2000). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
46.
Smith, S., & Taylor, G. ( 1994). Improving research communication in the Canadian tourism industry. In M. Staite & R. Wong (Eds.), Revitalizing Canadian tourism: A 911 call (TTRA Canada Conference Proceedings , pp. 165-169). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: TTRA Canada.
47.
Storer, N. ( 1966). The social system of science. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
48.
Taylor, J. ( 1973). The scientific community. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49.
Travel and Tourism Research Association. ( 2004). TTRA strategic plan 2004-2008. Retrieved from http://www.ttra.com.
50.
Travel and Tourism Research Association. ( 2007). TTRA-International membership survey (December 2006-January 2007). Boise, ID: TTRA.
51.
Tuire, P., & Erno, L. ( 2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.
52.
Weedman, J. ( 1993). On the "isolation" of humanists: A report of an invisible college. Communication Research, 20, 749-779.
53.
Weiss, C. ( 1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 29, 426-631.
54.
Wingens, M. ( 1990). Toward a general utilization theory: A systems theory reformulation for the two-communities metaphor. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12, 27-42.
55.
Xiao, H., & Smith, S. ( 2006). The making of tourism research: Insights from a social sciences journal. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 490-507.
56.
Xiao, H., & Smith, S. ( 2007). The use of tourism knowledge: Research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research, 34, 310-331.
57.
Xiao, H., & Smith, S. ( 2008). Knowledge impact: An appraisal of tourism scholarship . Annals of Tourism Research, 35, 62-83.
58.
Xiao, H., & Smith, S. ( 2010). Professional communication in an applied tourism research community. Tourism Management, 31, 402-411.
59.
Yin, R. ( 2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
