Dark rides are archetypal theme park attractions that provide compelling experiences through carefully structured experience designs. In a literature review, we follow and slightly modify Langhof and Güldenberg’s conceptualization of the dark ride experience (DRE) and suggest that the DRE mostly consists of narrative transportation, presence, flow, and emotions. However, to what extent these conceptualizations match actual dark ride supply remains unexamined. Therefore, we evaluate 238 dark rides in the EMEA region on product determinants of the DRE and compare literature-based conceptualizations of the DRE against actual dark ride supply. Findings indicate that dark rides highly vary in terms of storytelling, theming, and pervasive interactivity, thus questioning whether all components of the DRE always apply to the full dark ride spectrum. Proposing the Dark Ride Cube as a dark ride typology, Langhof and Güldenberg’s conceptualization of the DRE is largely confirmed, as well as the currently suggested modifications.
AliF.KimW. G.LiJ.JeonH.-M. (2018). Make it delightful: Customers’ experience, satisfaction and loyalty in Malaysian theme parks. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 7(March), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.05.003
BakerC. (2018). Exploring a three-dimensional narrative medium: The theme park as “De Sprookjessprokkelaar,” the gatherer and teller of stories [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida]. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5795/
4.
BastiaansenM.LubX. D.MitasO.JungT. H.Passos AscençãoM.HanD.-I.MoilanenT.SmitB.StrijboschW. (2019). Emotions as core building blocks of an experience. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(2), 651-668. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0761
5.
BordwellD.ThompsonK. (2008). Film art: An introduction (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill International Editions.
6.
BrownE.CairnsP. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Dykstra-EricksonE.TscheligiM. (Eds.), CHI EA ‘04: CHI ‘04 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1297-1300). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986048
7.
CairnsP.CoxA.NordinI. (2014). Immersion in digital games: Review of gaming experience research. In AngelidesM. C.AgiusH. (Eds.), Handbook of digital games (pp. 337-361). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118796443.ch12
8.
CampbellJ. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books.
9.
CornelisP. C. M. (2010). Achieving attraction accountability through an attraction response matrix. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(4), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2010.481571
CornelisP. C. M. (2017). Investment thrills: Managing risk and return for the amusement parks and attractions industry. NRIT Media.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
13.
Di FrancoG. (2015). Multiple correspondence analysis: One only or several techniques?Quality & Quantity, 50(3), 1299-1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0
14.
DongP.SiuN. Y.-M. (2013). Servicescape elements, customer predispositions and service experience: The case of theme park visitors. Tourism Management, 36(June), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.004
Feldman BarrettL. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx060
19.
FowdurL.KadiyaliV.NarayanV. (2009). The impact of emotional product attributes on consumer demand: An application to the U.S. motion picture industry (Johnson School Research Paper Series No. #22-09). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1407520
20.
FreitagF. (2017). “Like walking into a movie”: Intermedial relations between theme parks and movies. Journal of Popular Culture, 50(4), 704-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12569
21.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
22.
Hennig-ThurauT.HoustonM. B. (2019). Entertainment science: Data analysis and practical theory for movies, games, books, and music. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89292-4
23.
HoverM. (2013). The Efteling as a “narrator” of fairy tales [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tilburg University.
24.
LanghofJ. G.GüldenbergS. (2019). Pirates, ghosts and customer loyalty: Reviewing the dark ride experience. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31(July), 398-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.06.004
LêS.JosseJ.HussonF. (2008). FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
27.
LiS. (2021). Using self-report and skin conductance measures to evaluate theme park experiences. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 27(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766720969738
28.
LiangZ.LiX. (2021). What is a theme park? A synthesis and research framework. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211069173
MilmanA.TasciA. D. A. (2018). Exploring the experiential and sociodemographic drivers of satisfaction and loyalty in the theme park context. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8(June), 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.06.005
PrinceG. (2008). Narrativehood, narrativity, narratability. In PierJ.García LandaJ. Á. (Eds.), Theorizing narrativity (pp. 19-27). de Gruyter.
33.
ProppV. (1968). Morphology of the folktale (ScottL., Trans. 2nd ed.). University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/783911
34.
ReschlyA.ChristensonS. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
StoneP. R. (2006). A dark tourism spectrum: Towards a typology of death and macabre related tourist sites, attractions and exhibitions. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 54(2), 145-160. http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/27720/1/27720%20fulltext_stamped.pdf
39.
StrijboschW.MitasO.Van BlaricumT.VugtsO.GoversC.HoverM.GelissenJ.BastiaansenM. (2021). When the parts of the sum are greater than the whole: Assessing the peak-and-end-theory for a heterogeneous, multi-episodic tourism experience. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20(June), 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100607
40.
TEA/AECOM. (2020). TEA/AECOM 2019 Theme index and museum index: The global attractions attendance report. Themed Entertainment Association (TEA). https://aecom.com/theme-index/
41.
Van LaerT.De RuyterK.ViscontiL. M.WetzelsM. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797-817. https://doi.org/10.1086/673383
42.
WuH.-C.LiM.-Y.LiT. (2014). A study of experiential quality, experiential value, experiential satisfaction, theme park image, and revisit intention. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42(1), 26-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348014563396
43.
YoungerD. (2016). Theme park design and the art of themed entertainment. Inklingwood Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
