Slippages between dominant-nonhegemonic masculinities and hegemonic masculinities obscure and confuse the importance of these masculinities for understanding the hierarchal gender order. This article uses in-depth interviews (N = 22) with oilfield workers, and observations at drilling sites to clarify how men can construct a socially dominant-nonhegemonic masculinity and subordinate a previously hegemonic masculinity. This study shows how a recursive relationship between industry and organizational safety policies enable men to construct a new dominant masculinity predicated on safety at work, while socially dominant men remain complicit with hegemonic masculinity in the domestic sphere. The discussion underscores the importance of distinguishing between dominant-nonhegemonic and hegemonic masculinities, which promotes our understanding of the hierarchal relationship among masculinities, femininities, and the struggle for gender dominance.
ArcherMargaret Scotford. 2007. Making Our Way through the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarlettPeggy F.CongerKatherine J.. 2004. “Three Visions of Masculine Success on American Farms.”Men and Masculinities7:205–27.
3.
BarrettFrank J.1996. “The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy.”Gender, Work & Organization3:129–42.
4.
BeasleyChristine. 2008. “Rethinking Hegemonic Masculinity in a Globalizing World.”Men and Masculinities11:86–103.
5.
BjorvatnBjørnStangenesKristineOyaneNicolasForbergKnut. 2006. “Subjective and Objective Measures of Adaptation and Readaptation to Night Work on an Oil Rig in the North Sea.”Sleep29:821.
6.
BrandthBerit. 1995. “Rural Masculinity in Transition: Gender Images in Tractor Advertisements.”Journal of Rural Studies11:123–33.
7.
BrandthBeritHaugenMarit S.. 2000. “From Lumberjack to Business Manager: Masculinity in the Norwegian Forestry Press.”Journal of Rural Studies16:343–55.
8.
BrittonDana M.2000. “The Epistemology of the Gendered Organization.”Gender & Society14:418–34.
9.
ButlerJudith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
10.
CampbellHugh. 2000. “The Glass Phallus: Public Masculinity and Drinking in Rural New Zealand.”Rural Sociology65: 562–81.
11.
CampbellHughBellMichael Mayerfeld. 2000. “The Question of Rural Masculinities.”Rural Sociology65:532.
12.
CarrollMatthew S.LeeRobert G.McLainRebecca J.. 2005. Communities and Forests: Where People Meet the Land. Edited by LeeRobert G.FieldDonald R.. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
13.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CollinsonDavid L.1998. “‘Shift-ing Lives’: Work-home Pressures in the North Sea Oil Industry.”The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology35:301.
15.
CollinsonDavid L.1999. “‘Surviving the Rigs’: Safety and Surveillance on North Sea Oil Installations.”Organization Studies20:579.
16.
ConnellRaewyn. [1995] 2005. Masculinities. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
ConnellRaewyn. 2000. The Men and the Boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CourtenayWill H.2006. “Rural Men’s Health: Situating Risk in the Negotiation of Masculinity.” In Country Boys: Masculinity and Rural Life, edited by CampbellHughBellMichaelFinneyMargaret, 139–58. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
DellingerKirsten. 2004. “Masculinities in ‘Safe’ and ‘Embattled’ Organizations: Accounting for Pornographic and Feminist Magazines.”Gender & Society18:545–66.
23.
DemetriouDemetrakis K.2001. “Connell’s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.”Theory and Society30:337–61.
24.
ElyRobin J.MeyersonDebra E.. 2010. “An Organizational Approach to Undoing Gender: The Unlikely Case of Offshore Oil Platforms.”Research in Organizational Behavior30:3–34.
25.
FloodMichael. 2002. “Between Men and Masculinity: An Assessment of the Term ‘Masculinity’ in Recent Scholarship on Men.” In Manning the Next Millennium: Studies in Masculinities, edited by SharynPearceMullerVivienne, 203–14. Perth, Australia: Black Swan.
26.
GibbsM.HamptonS.MorganL.ArendtJ.. 2002. “Adaptation of the Circadian Rhythm of 6-sulphatoxymelatonin to a Shift Schedule of Seven Nights Followed by Seven Days in Offshore Oil Installation Workers.”Neuroscience Letters325:91–94.
27.
GiddensAnthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. New York: Basic Books.
28.
GiddensAnthony. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
GlaserBarney G.1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
HirschhornLarryYoungDonald R.. 1993. “The Psychodynamics of Safety: A Case Study of an Oil Refinery.” In The Psychodynamics of Organizations, edited by HirschhornLarry. Labor and Social Change, 143–64. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
KimmelMichael S.2004. “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity.” In Feminism and Masculinities, edited by MurphyPeter Francis. Oxford Readings in Feminism, 182–99. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
LewisJanePorterMarilynShrimptonMark. 1988. Women, Work, and Family in the British, Canadian, and Norwegian Offshore Oilfields. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
LiepinsRuth. 1998. “The Gendering of Farming and Agricultural Politics: a matter of discourse and power.”Australian Geographer29: 371–88.
35.
LiepinsRuth. 2000. “Making Men: The Construction and Representation of Agriculture-based Masculinities in Australia and New Zealand.”Rural Sociology65:605–20.
36.
LittleJo. 2002. “Rural Geography: Rural Gender Identity and the Performance of Masculinity and Femininity in the Countryside.”Progress in Human Geography26:665–70.
37.
LittleJoLeyshonMichael. 2003. “Embodied Rural Geographies: Developing Research Agendas.”Progress in Human Geography27:257–72.
38.
MaxwellJoseph A.2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
McKeeLornaMauthnerNatashaMacleanCatherine. 2000. “‘Family Friendly’ Policies and Practices in the Oil and Gas Industry: Employers’ Perspectives.”Work, Employment and Society14:557–71.
40.
MenninoSue FalterRubinBeth A.BrayfieldApril. 2005. “Home-to-job and Job-to-home Spillover: The Impact of Company Policies and Workplace Culture.”Sociological Quarterly46:107–35.
41.
MesserschmidtJames W.1993. Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Incorporated.
42.
MesserschmidtJames W.2000. Nine Lives: Adolescent Masculinities, the Body, and Violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
MesserschmidtJames W.2004. Flesh and Blood: Adolescent Gender Diversity and Violence. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
MesserschmidtJames W.2008. “And Now, the Rest of the Story: A Commentary on Christine Beasley’s ‘Rethinking Hegemonic Masculinity in a Globalizing World.’”Men and Masculinities11:104–8.
45.
MesserschmidtJames W.2010. Hegemonic Masculinities and Camouflaged Politics: Unmasking the Bush Dynasty and its War Against Iraq. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Pub.
46.
MesserschmidtJames W.2012a. “Engendering Gendered Knowledge: Assessing the Academic Appropriation of Hegemonic Masculinity.”Men and Masculinities15:56–76.
47.
MesserschmidtJames W.2012b. Gender, Heterosexuality, and Youth Violence: The Struggle for Recognition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
MessnerMichael A.Bozada-DeasSuzel. 2009. “Separating the Men from the Moms.”Gender & Society23:49–71.
49.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. M.. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
MillerGloria E.2004. “Frontier Masculinity in the Oil Industry: The Experience of Women Engineers.”Gender, Work & Organization11:47–73.
51.
MorganDavid H. J.1992. Discovering Men. London: Routledge.
52.
MorrisEdward W.2008. “‘Rednecks’, ‘Rutters’, and ‘Rithmetic’: Social Class, Masculinity, and Schooling in a Rural Context.”Gender & Society22:728–51.
53.
NorthcuttNorvellMcCoyDanny. 2004. Interactive Qualitative Analysis: A Systems Method for Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
PeterGregoryBellMichael MayerfeldJarnaginSusanBauerDonna. 2000. “Coming Back across the Fence: Masculinity and the Transition to Sustainable Agriculture.”Rural Sociology65:215–33.
55.
PeterGregoryBellMichael MayerfeldJarnaginSusanBauerDonna. 2006. “Cultivating Dialogue: Sustainable Agriculture and Masculinities.” In Country Boys: Masculinity And Rural Life, edited by CampbellHughBellMichaelFinneyMargaret, 27–45. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
56.
RismanBarbara J.2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.”Gender & Society18:429.
57.
RismanBarbara J.2009. “From Doing to Undoing: Gender as We Know It.”Gender & Society23:81–84.
58.
SaldañaJohnny M.2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
SaugeresLise. 2002a. “Of Tractors and Men: Masculinity, Technology and Power in a French Farming Community.”Sociologia Ruralis42:143–59.
60.
SaugeresLise. 2002b. “The Cultural Representation of the Farming Landscape: Masculinity, Power and Nature.”Journal of Rural Studies18:373–84.
61.
SchippersMimi. 2007. “Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony.”Theory and Society36:85–102.
WestCandaceZimmermanDon H.. 2009. “Accounting for Doing Gender.”Gender & Society23:112–22.
64.
WicksDavid. 2002. “Institutional Bases of Identity Construction and Reproduction: The Case of Underground Coal Mining.”Gender, Work & Organization9:308–35.
65.
WilliamsJoan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
WilliamsJoan. 2010. Reshaping the Work-family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
YinRobert K.2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
