Inappropriate behaviors are common during hallway transitions. Researchers have successfully reduced hallway transition times using the Timely Transitions Game, which involves applying interdependent group rewards delivered contingent upon a class’s transition time. A multiple-baseline design was used to evaluate effects of a modified Timely Transitions Game (i.e., a response cost component was added to typical Timely Transition Game procedures) on inappropriate hallway transition behavior across three elementary summer program classrooms. Visual analysis of a repeated-measures graph and statistical analysis suggested that the modified Timely Transitions Game caused immediate, consistent, and meaningful reductions in inappropriate transition behaviors across classrooms. The modified Timely Transitions Game may be an effective prevention and remediation procedure consistent with approaches focusing on reducing inappropriate behavior via the application of behavioral strategies. Discussion is focused on the need for additional studies to evaluate longitudinal effects and the generalizability of the current findings.
BarbettaP. M.NoronaK. L.BicardD. F. (2005). Classroom behavior management: A dozen common mistakes and what to do instead. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 11–19.
2.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124. doi:10.1901/1969.2-119
3.
Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.ZainiS.ZhangN.VannestK. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 180–190. doi:10.1177/1098300715592355
4.
BuckG. H. (1999). Smoothing the rough edges of classroom transitions. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 224–235.
5.
CameronC. E.ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J. (2005). Effects of variation in teacher organization on classroom functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 61–85. doi:10.1016/2004.12.002
6.
CampbellS.SkinnerC. H. (2004). Combining explicit timing with an interdependent group contingency program to decrease transition times: An investigation of the timely transitions game. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 11–27. doi:10.1300/J370v20n02_02
7.
CartaJ. J.AtwaterJ. B.SchwartzI. S.MillerP. A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis in study of transitions across early education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 298–316.
8.
CoddingR. S.SmythC. A. (2008). Using performance feedback to decrease classroom transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 325–345. doi:10.1080/10474410802463312
9.
ColvinG.SugaiG.GoodR. H.LeeY. Y. (1997). Using active supervision and pre-correction to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344–363.
10.
FlowerA.McKennaJ.MuethingC. S.BryantD. P.BryantB. R. (2014). Effects of the good behavior game on classwide off-task behavior in a high school basic algebra resource classroom. Behavior Modification, 38, 45–68. doi:10.1177/0145445513507574
11.
FudgeD. L.SkinnerC. H.WilliamsJ. L.CowdenD.ClarkJ.BlissS. L. (2008). Increasing on-task behavior in every student in a second-grade classroom: Validating the color wheel system. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 575–592. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.003
12.
HawkinsR. O.HaydonT.DenuneH.LarkinW.FiteN. (2015). Improving the transition behavior of high school students with emotional behavioral disorders using randomized interdependent group contingency. School Psychology Review, 44, 208–223. doi:10.17105/spr-14-0020.1
13.
HineJ. F.ArdoinS. P.FosterT. E. (2015). Decreasing transition times in elementary school classrooms: Using computer-assisted instruction to automate intervention components. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 495–510. doi:10.1002/jaba.233
14.
HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4
15.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
LewisT. J.Garrison-HarrellL. (1999). Effective behavior support: Designing setting specific interventions. Effective School Practices, 17(4), 38–46.
17.
McCurdyM.SkinnerC. H.IgnacioP.VanMaarenV. (2018). The timely transitions game: Occasioning efficient transitions. In HawkinsR.NaborsL. (Eds.), Promoting prosocial behaviors in children through games and play: Making social emotional learning fun (pp. 29–62). New York, NY: Nova Science.
18.
McIntoshK.HermanK.SanfordA.McGrawK.FlorenceK. (2004). Teaching transitions: Techniques for promoting success between lessons. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 32–38.
19.
MurphyK. A.TheodoreL. A.AloisoD.Alric-EdwardsJ. M.HughesT. L. (2007). Interdependent group contingency and mystery motivators to reduce preschool disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 53–64. doi:10.1002/pits.20205
20.
PopkinJ.SkinnerC. H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 282–295.
21.
RhodeG.JensonW. R.ReavisH. K. (1993). The tough kid book: Practical classroom management strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
22.
RhymerK. N.CatesG. L. (2006). Student performance on and preferences for mathematics word problems: An investigation of the effects of explicit timing and interspersing procedures. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 34–45.
23.
RothJ.LinverM.HofferthS.Brooks-GunnJ. (2003). What happens during the school day? Time diaries from a national sample of elementary school teachers. The Teachers College Record, 105, 317–343.
24.
SaeckerL.SagerK.WilliamsJ. L.SkinnerC. H.SpurgeonS.LunaE. (2008). Decreasing teacher’s repeated directions and students’ inappropriate talking in an urban, fifth-grade classroom using the Color Wheel procedures. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 9, 18–32.
25.
SaiferS. (2003). Practical solutions to practically every problem: The early childhood teachers manualSt. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
26.
SchmitJ.AlperS.RaschkeD.RyndakD. (2000). Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Mental Retardation, 38, 131–137.
27.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1998). Summarizing single subject studies: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242.
28.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2001). How to summarize single participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244.
29.
SkinnerB. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Krofts.
30.
SkinnerC. H. (2000). Faculty relations: “Shut up and sit down.” In PetersonP.TysonL. (Eds.), Critical incidents in school counseling, second edition (pp. 121–124). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
31.
SkinnerC. H.CashwellC. S.DunnM. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61–78. doi:10.1300/j008v12n01_04
32.
SkinnerC. H.RhymerK. N.McDanielC. E. (2000). Naturalistic direct observation in educational settings. In ShapiroE. S.KratochwillT. R. (Eds.), Conducting school-based assessments of children and adolescents (pp. 21–54). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
SkinnerC. H.SkinnerA. L.BurtonB. (2009). Applying group-oriented contingencies in classrooms. In Akin-LittleK. A.LittleS. G.BrayM.KehleT. (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (pp. 157–170). Washington, DC: APA Press.
34.
SkinnerC. H.SkinnerC. F.SkinnerA. L.CashwellT. C. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig at assembly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 806–820. doi:10.1177/00131619921968833
35.
SkinnerC. H.WatsonT. S. (2000). Randomized group contingencies: Lotteries in the classroom. The School Psychologist: Division of School Psychology, 54(2), 21–39.
36.
StageA.QuirozD. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
37.
Van HoutenR.HillS.ParsonsM. (1975). An analysis of a performance feedback system: The effects of timing and feedback, public posting, and praise upon academic performance and peer interaction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 581–591. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-449
38.
Van HoutenR.ThompsonC. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 227–230. doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-227
39.
WinettR. A.WinklerR. C. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499–504. doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-499
40.
YarbroughJ. L.SkinnerC. H.LeeY. J.LemmonsC. (2004). Decreasing transition times in a second grade classroom: Scientific support for the timely transitions game. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 85–107. doi:10.1300/j370v20n02_06
41.
Zibreg HargisD.PattiA. L.MaheadyL.BudinS.RaffertyL. (2016). Using interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected criteria and rewards to enhance homework performance in an eighth-grade classroom. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 15, 172–192. doi:10.1300/j370v20n02_03
