The space-time risk window associated with near-repeat burglary patterns would seem to present a natural opportunity for burglary prevention efforts. However, constraints associated with the reporting of, police response to, and space-time patterning of burglaries can reduce the crime prevention potential of such efforts. To better estimate the crime prevention potential of focusing on near-repeat burglaries, we studied burglary patterns in 10 U.S. cities. Descriptive aspatial and spatial statistics were used to answer the research questions. Significant space-time clustering does not necessarily indicate an actionable near-repeat problem. Police analysts and researchers should also consider the crime prevention potential of focusing on near repeats—in other words, the proportion of burglaries that are preventable. The results of this test provide new information to guide the implementation and evaluation of crime prevention efforts focused on near-repeat events.
AndersonD.CheneryS.PeaseK. (1995). Biting back: Tackling repeat burglary and car crime.
London, England:
Home Office Police Research.
2.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2016). Situational Prevention. In WeisburdD.FarringtonD. P.GillC. (Eds.), What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: Lessons from systematic reviews (pp. 111–135).
New York, NY:
Springer New York.
3.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D.HirschfieldA. (2003). Pushing back the boundaries: New techniques for assessing the impact of burglary schemes.
London, England:
The Home Office.
4.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D.HirschfieldA. (2004).
The measurement of crime prevention intensity and its impact on levels of crime.British Journal of Criminology,
44, 419–440. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh020
5.
BragaA. A. (2007).
Effects of hot spots policing on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews,
2007(1). doi:10.4073/csr.2007.1
6.
BrantinghamP. J.DyresonD. A.BrantinghamP. L. (1976).
Crime seen through a cone of resolution.American Behavioral Scientist,
20(2), 261–273. doi:10.1177/000276427602000207
7.
ChaineyS.Curtis-HamS. J.EvansR. M.BurnsG. J. (2018).
Examining the extent to which repeat and near repeat patterns can prevent crime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management,
41(5), 608--622. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2016-0172
8.
ChaineyS.RatcliffeJ. H. (2005). GIS and crime mapping.
London, England:
John Wiley and Sons.
9.
CheneryS.HoltJ.PeaseK. (1997). Biting back II: Reducing repeat victimisation in Huddersfield (
Vol.2).
London, England:
Home Office Police Research Group.
10.
ClarkeR. V.EckJ. (2005). Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 steps.
Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
11.
EckJ. E.ChaineyS.CameronJ. G.LeitnerM.WilsonR. E. (2005). Mapping crime: Understanding hotspots.
Washington, DC:
National Institute of Justice.
12.
EkblomP.LawH.SuttonM.CrispP.WigginsR. (1996). Safer cities and domestic burglary.
London, England:
Home Office, Research and Statistics Directorate.
13.
ElffersH.PeetersM. P.van der KempJ.BeijersG. (2018). Quasi-experimental evaluation of near repeat patrolling: The Amstelveen experiment.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.33339.31524
FieldingM.JonesV. (2012).
‘Disrupting the optimal forager’: Predictive risk mapping and domestic burglary reduction in Trafford, Greater Manchester.International Journal of Police Science & Management,
14, 30–41. doi:10.1350/ijps.2012.14.1.260
16.
ForresterD.ChattertonM.PeaseK.BrownR. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project, Rochdale.
London, England:
Home Office.
17.
GroffE. R. (2013). Measuring a place’s exposure to facilities using geoprocessing models: An illustration using drinking places and crime. In LeitnerM. (Ed.), Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (
Vol.8, pp. 269–295).
New York, NY:
Springer.
18.
GroffE. R.TaniguchiT. (2019).
Using citizen notification to interrupt near repeat residential burglary patterns: The micro-level near repeat experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology. doi:10.1007/s11292-018-09350-1
19.
JohnsonS. D.BernascoW.BowersK. J.ElffersH.RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG.TownsleyM. (2007).
Space–time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
23, 201–219. doi:10.1007/s10940-007-9025-3
20.
JohnsonS. D.BowersK. J. (2004).
The burglary as clue to the future.European Journal of Criminology,
1, 237–255. doi:10.1177/1477370804041252
21.
JohnsonS. D.BowersK. J.BirksD. J.PeaseK. (2009). Predictive mapping of crime by ProMap: Accuracy, units of analysis, and the environmental backcloth. In WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place (pp. 171–198).
New York, NY:
Springer.
22.
JohnsonS. D.DaviesT.MurrayA.DittaP.BelurJ.BowersK. J. (2017).
Evaluation of Operation Swordfish: A near-repeat target-hardening strategy.Journal of Experimental Criminology,
13, 505–525. doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9301-7
23.
LaubJ. H. (2011).
Strengthening NIJ: Mission, science and process. NIJ Journal,
268, 1–21.
24.
LaycockG. (2005). Defining crime science. In SmithM. J.TilleyN. (Eds.), Crime science: New approaches to preventing and detecting crime (pp. 3–24).
Devon, England:
Routledge.
MoretoW. D.PizaE. L.CaplanJ. M. (2014).
“A plague on both your houses?”: Risks, repeats and reconsiderations of urban residential burglary.Justice Quarterly,
31(6), 1102–1126. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.754921
27.
PizaE. L.CarterJ. G. (2017).
Predicting initiator and near repeat events in spatiotemporal crime patterns: An analysis of residential burglary and motor vehicle theft.Justice Quarterly,
35, 842–870. doi:10.1080/07418825.2017.1342854
28.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2009). Near repeat calculator (version 1.3).
Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University.
29.
RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG. F. (2008).
Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings.Security Journal,
21, 58–76. doi:10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350068
30.
RosserG.DaviesT.BowersK.JohnsonS.ChengT. (2017).
Predictive crime mapping: Arbitrary grids or street networks?Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
33, 569–594. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9321-x
31.
SantosR. G.SantosR. B. (2015a).
Practice-based research: Ex post facto evaluation of evidence-based police practices implemented in residential burglary micro-time hot spots.Evaluation Review,
39, 451–479. doi:10.1177%2F0193841X15602818
32.
SantosR. B.SantosR. G. (2015b).
Examination of police dosage in residential burglary and residential theft from vehicle micro-time hot spots. Crime Science,
4(1), 27–39.
ShortM. B.D’OrsognaM. R.BrantinghamP. J.TitaG. E. (2009).
Measuring and modeling repeat and near-repeat burglary effects.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
25(3), 325–339. doi:10.1007/s10940-009-9068-8
35.
StokesN.ClareJ. (2019). Preventing near-repeat residential burglary through cocooning: Post hoc evaluation of a targeted police-led pilot intervention. Security Journal. 32(1), 45–62
36.
ThompsonS.TownsleyM.PeaseK. (2008).
Repeat burglary victimisation: Analysis of a partial failure.Irish Journal of Psychology,
29, 131–139. doi:10.1080/03033910.2008.10446279
37.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2000).
Repeat burglary victimisation: Spatial and temporal patterns.Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology,
33, 37–63. doi:10.1177/000486580003300104
38.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2003).
Infectious Burglaries. A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis.British Journal of Criminology,
43(3), 615–633. doi:10.1093/bjc/43.3.615
WellsmithM.BirksD. J. (2008).
Research on target: A collaboration between researchers and practitioners for a target hardening scheme.International Review of Law, Computers & Technology,
22, 181–189.
41.
ZhangY.ZhaoJ.RenL.HooverL. (2015).
Space–time clustering of crime events and neighborhood characteristics in Houston.Criminal Justice Review,
40(3), 340–360. doi:10.1177/0734016815573309
