Debates are ongoing on whether man can engage in gender change and challenge hegemonic masculinities. The study aimed to analyze in what ways young Ecuadorian men—currently or recently involved in activism to advance gender equality and reproductive rights—defined different masculinities, hegemonic and alternative. We used Grounded Theory to collect and analyze three focus group discussions and 15 individual interviews with 30 young activist men in Ecuador. A core category captured the process of defining masculinities: ‘Moving from passive acceptance of machismo to critical reflection and action’ that in turn linked to three theoretical categories: ‘Opposing machismo’, ‘From machos to men’, and ‘Inspiring opposition to machismo’. We drew upon framing theory in social movement studies to interpret the findings and thereby enhance the theory of hegemonic masculinity. Young activist men successfully framed the problem and motives for collective mobilization, but they wavered when it came to framing solutions.
AndradeX. (2001) ‘Machismo and Politics in Ecuador: The Case of Pancho Jaime’, Men and Masculinities3(3): 299–315.
2.
AndradeX. (2002) ‘Pancho Jaime and the Political Uses of Masculinity in Ecuador’, in GutmannM.C. (ed.) Changing Men and Masculinities in Latin America, pp. 281–306. Duke, USA: Duke University Press.
3.
AraujoK.PrietoM. (2008) [Sexualities’ studies in Latin America] Estudios sobre sexualidades en América Latina. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO Ecuador.
4.
AsheF. (2004) ‘Deconstructing the Experiential Bar Male Experience and Feminist Resistance’, Men and Masculinities7(2): 187–204.
5.
BeasleyC. (2008) ‘Rethinking Hegemonic Masculinity in a Globalizing World’, Men and Masculinities11(1): 86–103.
6.
BeattieP.M. (2002) ‘Beyond Machismos: Recent Examinations of Masculinities in Latin America’, Men and Masculinities4(3): 303–08.
7.
CharmazK. (2006) ‘Reconstructing Theory in Grounded Theory Studies’. In CharmazK. (ed.) Constructing Grounded Theory—A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, pp. 123–150. London: SAGE Publications.
8.
CoeA. (2011) “Pushing Back and Stretching: Frame Adjustments among Reproductive Rights Advocates in Peru.” Mobilization: An International Journal16(4): 489–507.
9.
CoeA.GoicoleaI.HurtigA.K.San SebastianM. (2012a) ‘Understanding how young people do activism: youth strategies on sexual health in Ecuador and Peru’, Youth and Society, Published on-line Oct 31, 2012: http://dx.doi:10.1177/0044118X12464640
10.
CoeA.GoicoleaI.OhmanA. (2012b) ‘How gender hierarchies matter in youth activism: Young people’s mobilizing around sexual health in Ecuador and Peru’, Journal of Youth Studies. Published on-line Nov 21, 2012: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136762612012.744815
11.
ConnellR.W. (1995) Masculinities. 2nd ed.Berkeley, Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press.
12.
ConnellR.W.MesserschmidtJ.W. (2005) ‘Hegemonic Masculinity. Rethinking the Concept’, Gender and Society19(6): 829–59.
13.
ConnellR.W.WoodJ.F. (2005) ‘Globalization and Business Masculinities’, Men and Masculinities7(4): 347–64.
14.
DahlgrenM.EmmelinM.WinkvistA. (2004) Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University Press.
15.
DemetriouD.Z. (2001) Connell’s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique. Theory and Society30(3), 337–61.
16.
DigbyT. (1998) Men Doing Feminism. New York, USA: Routledge.
17.
FereeM.M. (2003) ‘Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing of the Abortion Debate of the United States and Germany’, American Journal of Sociology109(2): 304–44.
18.
FloodM. (2005) ‘Men’s Collective Struggle for Gender Justice’, in KimmelM.S.HearnJ.ConnellR.W. (eds), Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities pp. 458–66. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publications.
19.
FullerN. (1998) [‘Reflections on Machismo in Latin America’] ‘Reflexiones sobre el machismo en America Latina’, in ValdésT.OlavarríaJ. (eds.) [Masculinities and Gender Equity in Latin America] Masculinidades y equidad de género en America Latina, pp. 258–66. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile.
20.
GoicoleaI.SalazarM.EdinK.OhmanA. (2012) ‘When Sex is Hardly about Mutual Pleasure: Dominant and Resistant Discourses on Sexuality and its Consequences for Young People’s Sexual Health’, International Journal of Sexual Health24(4), 303–17.
21.
GramsciA. (1971) Selection from the Prison Notebooks. HoareQuintinSmithGeoffrey Nowell, eds. New York: International Publishers.
22.
GutmannM.C. (1996) The Meanings of Macho: Being a Man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
GutmannM.C. (1998) [‘Machismo’] ‘El machismo’, in ValdésT.OlavarríaJ. (eds.) [Masculinities and Gender Equity in Latin America] Masculinidades y equidad de genero en America Latina, (pp. 238–257). Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile.
24.
GutmannM.C. (2003) Changing Men and Masculinities in Latin America. Durham, United States: Duke University Press.
25.
GutmannM.C.Viveros VigoyaM. (2005) ‘Masculinities in Latin America’, in KimmelM.S.HearnJ.ConnellR.W. (eds) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, pp. 114–28. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
26.
HearnJ. (2004) From Hegemonic Masculinity to the Hegemony of Men. Feminist Theory5(1), 49–72.
27.
HeathS. (1987) ‘Male feminism’, in JardineA.SmithP. (eds) Men in Feminism, pp. 1–32. London: Routledge.
28.
HolmgrenL.E. (2007) ‘Killing Bill: Men as Rebellious Feminists in the Politics of Passing’, Norma: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies2(1): 16–37.
29.
HolmgrenL.E.HearnJ. (2009) ‘Framing “Men in Feminism”: Theoretical Locations, Local Contexts and Practical Passings in Men’s Gender-conscious Positionings on Gender Equality and Feminism’, Journal of Gender Studies18(4): 403–18.
30.
HowsonR. (2006) Challenging Hegemonic Masculinity. New York: Routledge.
31.
KimmelM.S.HearnJ.ConnellR.W. (eds) (2005) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publications.
32.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. New York, USA: SAGE.
33.
LindA.Argüello PazmiñoS. (2009) [‘Citizenship and Sexualities in Latin America’] ‘Ciudadanía y sexualidades en América Latina’. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales35, 13–18.
34.
ManeyG.M.WoehrleL.M.CoyP.G. (2005) ‘Harnessing and Challenging Hegemony: The U.S. Peace Movement After 9/11’, Sociological Perspectives48(3), 357–81.
35.
MccammonH.J.Sanders MuseC.NewmanH.D.TerrellT.M. (2007) ‘Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Success of the U.S. Women’s Jury Movements’, American Sociological Review72, 725–49.
36.
MesserchmidtJ. (2012) ‘Engendering Gendered Knowledge: Assessing the Academic Appropriation of Hegemonic Masculinity’, Men and Masculinities15: 56–76.
37.
Open Code 3.4. 2007. UMDAC and Division of Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
38.
RamirezH. (2011) ‘Masculinity in the Workplace: The Care of Mexican Immigrant Gardeners’, Men and Masculinities14(1): 97–116.
39.
SnowD.A.BenfordR. (1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization’, International Social Movement Research1(1): 197–218.
40.
SnowD.A.Burke RochfordE.WordenS.K.BenfordR. (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’, American Sociological Review51(4): 464–81.
41.
Scott SørensenA. (2000) ‘Becomings: Studies in Boys, Men and Masculinity’, Young8(4): 40–51.
42.
SoydanH. (1996) ‘Using the Vignette Method in Cross-cultural Comparisons’, in HantraisL.MangenS. (eds) Cross-national Research Methods in the Social Sciences, pp. 110–20. London, UK: Biddles.
43.
SternbergP. (2008) ‘Damned If They Do, Damned If They Don’t: Tensions in Nicaraguan Masculinities as Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Health Promotion’, Men and Masculinities10(5): 538–56.
44.
StobbeL. (2005) ‘Doing Machismo: Legitimating Speech Acts as a Selection Discourse’, Gender, Work and Organization12(2): 105–23.
45.
TorresJ.B.SolbergV.S.CarlstromA.H. (2002) ‘The Myth of Sameness among Latino Men and their Machismo’, Am J Orthopsychiatry72(2): 163–81.
46.
TroyaM.P. (2001) [‘I am not a machista, but… Masculinities among middle-class professionals in Quito’] ‘No soy machista pero… Masculinidades en profesionales de clase media en la ciudad de Quito’, in AndradeX.HerreraG. (eds) [Masculinities in Ecuador] Masculinidades en Ecuador, (pp. 67–100). Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO-Ecuador. ValdésT.OlavarríaJ. (1998) [To be a Man in Santiago of Chile: Despite Everything, the Same Model] Ser hombre en Santiago de Chile: a pesar de todo, un mismo modelo. In: VALDÉST.OLAVARRÍAJ. (eds) Masculinidades y equidad de género en América Latina [Masculinities and Gender Equity in Latin America], (pp. 12–35). Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile.
47.
Viveros VigoyaM. (2001) ‘Contemporary Latin American Perspectives on Masculinity’, Men and Masculinities3(3): 237–60.
48.
WetherellM.EdleyN. (1999) ‘Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: Imaginary Positions and Psycho-Discursive Practices’, Feminism and Psychology9(3): 335–56.
