The article presents an empirical understanding of the sacred among the Filipino youth from a multicultural and multifaith context. A multistage item development in Manila and Mindanao was undertaken to prepare a Likert scale meant to explore the empirical dimensions of the construct ‘sacred’. Exploratory factor analysis was utilized to identify the underlying factor structure. The results reveal a four-factor structure: religious, valued, ethical and communal. Filipino youths’ notions veered away from the traditional sacred–profane continuum by introducing a personal–religious dynamic. The results underscore the affinity of the religious dimensions (divine and communal) to Filipino youths’ personal appreciation (ethical and valued) of the sacred.
BaringR. (2013) From Churches to Malls: Reconfiguring Worship Spaces in the Philippines. Germany: Dynamics of Religion in Southeast Asia (DORISEA), Goettingen University. URL (consulted 23 July 2015): http://www.dorisea.de/en/node/1207
2.
BentlerP. and KanoY. (1990) ‘On the Equivalence of Factors and Components’, Multivariate
Behavioral Research25(1): 67–74.
3.
BhagwanR. (2009) ‘Creating Sacred Experiences for Children as Pathways to Healing, Growth and Transformation’, International Journal of Children’s Spirituality14(3):225–34.
4.
BüssingA.Foller-ManciniJ. G. and HeusserP. (2010) ‘Aspects of Spirituality in Adolescents’, International Journal of Children’s Spirituality15(1): 25–44.
CornelioJ. S. (2014) ‘Young People and Golden Rule Catholicism in the Philippines: The Case of Religiously Involved Filipino Students’, in VincettG. and ObinnaE. (eds) Christianity in the Modern World: Changes and Controversies, pp. 11–36. Farnham: Ashgate.
8.
CornwallM. (1988) ‘The Influence of Three Agents of Religious Socialization: Family, Church, and Peers’, in ThomasD. (ed.) The Religion and Family Connection: Social Science Perspectives, pp. 207–31. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
9.
CruzG.LagunaE. and RaymundoC. (2001) Family Influences on the Lifestyle of Filipino Youth. (East–West Center Working Papers, Population Series no. 108–8).
10.
CunninghamL. and KelsayJ. (2010) The Sacred Quest: An Invitation to the Study of Religion. 5th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
11.
DavieG. (1994) Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
12.
DavieG. (2007) Sociology of Religion. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
13.
DayA.VincettG. and CotterC. (2012) Social Identities between the Sacred and the Secular. London: Ashgate Publications.
14.
de MesaJ. (2012) ‘Inculturation as Pilgrimage’, in StephenB. Bevans (ed) Mission and Culture: The Louis J. Luzbetak Lectures. New York: Orbis Books.
15.
de MesaJ. (2013) ‘Bakas’, lecture delivered at De La Salle University, Philippines, 15 January, 2013.
16.
DollahiteD.MarksL. and GoodmanM. (2004) ‘Religiosity and Families: Relational and Spiritual Linkages in a Diverse and Dynamic Cultural Context’, in ColemanM. and GanongL. (eds) The Handbook of Contemporary Families: Considering the Past, Contemplating the Future,pp. 411–31.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
17.
DurkheimE. (1915) Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. SwainJ S. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
18.
EricksonJ. and JuneA. (1992) ‘Adolescent Religious Development and Commitment: A Structural Equation Model of the Role of Family, Peer Group, and Educational Influences’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion31(2): 131–52.
19.
EveretteD. and DeFleurM.L.(2010) Understanding Media in the Digital Age. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
20.
FloydF. J. and WidamanK. F. (1995) ‘Factor Analysis in the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments’, Psychological Assessment7(3): 286–99.
21.
FranciscoJ. M. (2010) ‘Mapping Religious and Civil Spaces in Traditional and Charismatic Christianities the Philippines’, Philippine Studies58(1–2): 185–221
.
22.
GranqvistP. (2002) ‘Attachment and Religiosity in Adolescence: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Evaluations’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(2):260–70.
23.
GonzalezA. (1997) ‘Towards Ecumenical Education in Religiously-oriented Institutions of Higher Education in Asia in the
Twenty-first Century’, in AndreaPeñaflorida (ed.) Tanglaw5(1): 1–6.
HefnerR. W. (2010) ‘Religious Resurgence in Contemporary Asia: Southeast Asian Perspectives on Capitalism, the State, and the New Piety’, The Journal of Asian Studies69(4): 1031–47.
26.
KopytoffI. (1986) ‘The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process’, in ArjunAppadurai (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, pp. 67–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LanuzaG. and GonzalesC. B. (2010) ‘The Violence of Cultural Difference: Accommodation and Oppositional Practices of Muslim Pupils in a Public Elementary School in Manila’, Social Science Diliman (January 2008–December 2009) 6(1):46–65.
28.
LanuzaG. (2003) ‘The Mediatization of Filipino Youth Culture: A Review of Literature’, Global Media Journal2(3): 1–34.
29.
LiwagM. E. C. D.de la CruzA. S. and MacapagalM. E. J. (1998) ‘How We Raise Our Daughters and Sons: Child-rearing and Gender Socialization in the Philippines’, Philippine Journal of Psychology31: 1–46.
30.
LynchG. (2012) The Sacred in the Modern World. London: Oxford University Press.
31.
LynchG.MitchellJ. and StrahanA. (eds) (2012) Religion, Media and Culture. New York: Routledge.
32.
MarksL. (2006) ‘Religion and Family Relational Health: An Overview and Conceptual Model’, Journal of Religion and Health45(4): 603–18.
33.
McDannellC. (2012) ‘Scrambling the Sacred and the Profane’, in LynchG.MitchellJ. and StrhanA. (eds) Religion, Media and Culture, pp. 135–46. New York: Routledge.
34.
NadeauR. L. (1996) ‘Dimensions of Sacred Space in Japanese Popular Culture’, Intercultural Communication StudiesVI (2): 110–14.
35.
NelsonL. P. (ed.) (2006) American Sanctuary: Understanding Sacred Spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
36.
OgenaN. (1999) ‘How are the Filipino Youth Changing? The Shifting Lifestyles of Our Nation’s Young 1970s to 1990s’, Philippine Social Sciences Review56(1–4): 83–106.
37.
OrejasT. (2009) ‘Languages of Faith Alive in Rituals in Pampanga’, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 21 January, 2009, A16.
38.
OttoR. (1923, 1936) The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PuyatJ. (2005) ‘The Filipino Youth Today: Their Strengths and the Challenges They Face’, in GaleF. and FaheyS. (eds) Youth in Transition: The Challenges of Generational Change in Asia, pp. 191–205. Canberra: The Association of Asian Social Science Research Councils (AASSREC).
41.
National Statistics Office (2014) Philippines in Figures 2014. Quezon City: National Statistics Office, Republic of the Philippines.
42.
RietveldT. and Van HoutR. (1993) Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language and Language Behaviour. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
43.
SandovalG.MangahasM. and GuerreroL. L. (1998) ‘The Situation of the Filipino Youth: A National Survey’, paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Sociology, Working Group 3/Sociology of Childhood, Montreal, Canada, 26 July–1 August, 1998. URL (consulted 2 February 2015): http://www.sws.org.ph/youth.htm
44.
SchonemannP. H. (1990) ‘Facts, Fictions and Common Sense about Factors and Components’, Multivariate Behavioral Research25(1): 47–51.
45.
SteigerJ. H. (1990) ‘Some Additional Thoughts on Components, Factors and Factor Indeterminacy’, Multivariate Behavioral Research25(1): 41–45.
46.
UST Social Research Center (UST-SRC) (1986) The Filipino Youth: A Sociological Study (Occasional Papers 2). Manila: UST Social Research Center.
VincettG. and ObinnaE. (eds) (2014) Christianity in the Modern World: Changes and Controversies. Farnham: Ashgate.
49.
VoasD. and CrockettA. (2005) ‘Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging’, Sociology39(1):11–28.
50.
WiegeleK. L. (2005) Investing in Miracles: El Shaddai and the Transformation of Popular Catholicism in the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
