This article is about the materiality of difference, about race, sex and sexual differences among others. To find out about these differences and their materialities, this article looks not into bodies but rather at how bodies are positioned in spaces and how they are enacted in practice. In the first part of the article, the focus is on the relationality of identities and how they are made and unmade in specific practices. The second part of the article attends to the various histories and practices that are drawn together in one specific body and how they help to enact a particular version of the body. Differences, it is argued, are not given ‘entities’ out there, awaiting dis-covery; rather they are effects that come about in relational practices. This indicates that materiality is not simply a given that can be taken on board (such as readily given biology or the body), but it is the very configuration through which differences can be articulated.
Ahmed S. ( 2008) Open forum: Imaginary prohibitions: Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the ‘new materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies15(1): 203-210.
2.
Anonymous (2005) Speuren tussen de skeletten. AD, 17 March.
3.
Arts N. ( 2003) Marcus van Eindhoven: An Archaeological Biography of a Medieval Child. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Matrijs.
4.
Arts N., Baetsen S., Lambregtse M., Nollen J. and Vega L. ( 2005) De opgraving van het ’koor en het kerkhof van de Catherinakerk in Eindhoven. Westheem: Tijdschrift voor de Nederlandse Archeologie54(3): 27-338.
5.
Butler J. ( 1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ . London and New York: Routledge.
6.
Caldwell PM ( 1991) A hair piece: Perspectives on the intersection of race and gender. Duke Law Journal1991(2): 365-396.
7.
Davis K. ( 2002) Feminist body/politics as world traveller: Translating Our Bodies, Ourselves. European Journal for Women’s Studies9(3): 223-247.
8.
Geschiere P. ( 2009) The Perils of Belonging: Autochtony, Citizenship, and Exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
Gilbert W. ( 1992) A vision of the Grail. In: Kevles DJ and Hood L (eds) The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 83-98.
10.
Hacker S. ( 1989) Pleasure, Power, and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. Boston, MA : Unwin Hyman.
11.
Haraway D. ( 1991a) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 183-201.
12.
Haraway D. ( 1991b) A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 149-183.
13.
Haraway D. ( 1992) Promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In: Grossberg L, Nelson C and Treichler P (eds) Cultural Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 295-337.
14.
Harding SF ( 2000) The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Keller EF ( 1992) Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender, and Science. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Keller EF ( 2000) The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Laclau E. and Mouffe C. ( 2001[1985]) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso .
18.
Latour B. ( 1990) Drawing things together. In: Woolgar S and Lynch M (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 19-69.
19.
Latour B. ( 2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society10(2/3, special issue: Bodies on trial): 205-229.
20.
Latour B. ( 2005) What is the Style of Matters of Concern?Assen: Van Gorcum.
21.
Lewis G.(2009) Celebrating intersectionality? Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies: Themes from a conference. European Journal of Women’s Studies16(3): 203-210.
22.
Li TM ( 2000) Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History42: 149-179.
23.
Lykke N. ( 2008) Feminist cultural studies of technoscience: Portrait of an implosion. In: Smelik A and Lykke N (eds) Bits of Life: Feminist at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience and Technology. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 3-16.
24.
McNeil M. ( 2008) Roots and routes: The making of feminist cultural studies of science. In: Smelik A and Lykke N (eds) Bits of Life: Feminist at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience and Technology. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 16-32.
25.
M’charek A. ( 2000) Technologies of population: Forensic DNA testing practices and the making of differences and similarities. Configurations8: 121-158.
26.
M’charek A. ( 2005a) The Human Genome Diversity Project: An Ethnography of Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
M’charek A. ( 2005b) Diversiteit, of waarom we van lijsten afmoeten. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies3: 74-78.
28.
M’charek A. ( 2008) Silent witness, articulate collective: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits. Bioethics22(9): 519-528.
29.
M’charek A. and Keller G. ( 2008) Parenthood and kinship in IVF for humans and animals: On traveling bits of life in the age of genetics. In: Smelik A and Lykke N (eds) Bits of Life: Feminist at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience and Technology . Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 61-79.
30.
Mol A. ( 1985) Wie weet wat een vrouw is? Over verschillen en de verhoudingen tussen de disciplines. Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies21: 10-22.
31.
Mol A. ( 1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law J and Hassard J (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, 74-90.
32.
Mol A. ( 2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
33.
Moser I. ( 2006) Sociotechnical practices and differences: On the interferences between disability, gender and class. Science, Technology and Human Values31: 537-564.
34.
Mouffe C. ( 2000) The Democratic Paradox. London and New York: Verso.
35.
Petchesky RP ( 1987) Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies13(2): 263-292.
36.
Serres M. and Latour B. ( 1990) Conversations on Science, Culture and Time, trans. Lapidus R. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Strathern M. ( 2002) Still giving nature a helping hand? Surrogacy: A debate about technology and society. Journal of Molecular Biology319: 985-993.
38.
WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor de Regeringsbeleid). ( 2007) Identificatie met Nederland. Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press.
39.
Yuval-Davis N. ( 2006) Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal for Women’s Studies13(3): 193-209.
