‘Evidence-based policy’ and ‘evidence-based management’ are increasingly popular ways of describing the relationship between research and practice. The majority discussing the evidence-based approach have tended to be in favour: here, ‘believers’. Yet this approach has also attracted critics: ‘heretics’. Understanding of such a division can be enhanced by dialectics: a process which tries to destabilize, reconcile or transcend apparent opposites. This divide is not simply a consequence of differences relating to epistemology, but also aesthetics: a set of reactions to the world seen as art. So, to analyse this divide requires a correspondingly rich model of dialectic. Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy offers this in its account of Apolline and Dionysian responses to the world. Dialectics supports a move beyond synchronous critique, and allows speculation as to the future development of the evidence-based approach.
Aristotle (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, 6th printing with corrections, BarnesJ. (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AshkanasyN. M. (2007) ‘From the Editor: Evidence-based Inquiry, Learning and Education: What are the Pros and Cons?’, Academy of Management Learning6: 5–8.
3.
AshworthR.BoyneG.EntwistleT., eds (2010) Public Service Improvement: Theories and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AstleyW. G.ZammutoR. (1992) ‘Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games’, Organization Science3(4): 443–60.
5.
BacharachS. B. (1989) ‘Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation’, Academy of Management Review14(4): 496–515.
6.
BeyerJ. M.TriceH. M. (1982) ‘The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings’, Administrative Science Quarterly27: 591–622.
7.
BhaskarR. (2008) Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Routledge.
8.
BIS (2010) The Role of Evaluation in Evidence-based Decision-making. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
9.
BoazA.AshbyD.DenyerD.EganM.HardenA.JonesD. R.PawsonR.TranfieldD. (2006) ‘A Multitude of Syntheses: A Comparison of Five Approaches from Diverse Policy Fields’, Evidence and Policy2(4): 479–502.
10.
BoswellJ. (1791/2008) The Life of Samuel Johnson. Herts: Wordsworth.
11.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
12.
BourdieuP. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BrinerR.DenyerD.RousseauD. (2009) ‘Evidence-based Management: Concept Cleanup Time?’, Academy of Management Perspectives23(4): 19–32.
14.
CampbellD. T. (1979) ‘A Tribal Model of the Social System Vehicle Carrying Scientific Knowledge’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization1: 181–201.
15.
CleggJ. S. (1972) ‘Nietzsche’s Gods in The Birth of Tragedy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy10(4): 431–438.
16.
CleggS. (2005) ‘Evidence-Based Practice in Educational Research: A Critical Realist Critique of Systematic Review’, British Journal of Sociology of Education26: 415–28.
17.
CollinsH. M. (1982) ‘Misunderstanding Replication’, Social Science Information26(2): 451–59.
18.
Conservative Party (2010) Invitation To Join The Government Of Britain: The Conservative Manifesto 2010. East Sussex: Pureprint Group.
19.
CookeB. (2008) ‘If Critical Management Studies Is Your Problem …’, Organization15(6): 912–14.
20.
DaviesH. T. O.NutleyS. M.SmithP. C. (2000) What Works? Evidence Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
21.
DenyerD.TranfieldD. (2009) ‘Producing a Systematic Review’, in BuchananD.BrymanA. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, pp. 671–89. London: Sage.
22.
EdenD. (2002) ‘Replication, Meta-analysis, Scientific Progress and AMJs Publication Policy’, Academy of Management Journal45(5): 841–46.
23.
EspelandW. N.StevensM. L. (1998) ‘Commensuration as a Social Process’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 313–43.
24.
EvansD.PearsonA. (2001) ‘Systematic Reviews: Gatekeepers of Nursing Knowledge’, Journal of Clinical Nursing10: 593–99.
25.
FitzgeraldL.FerlieE.WoodM.HawkinsC. (2002) ‘Interlocking Interactions: The Diffusion of Innovations in Health Care’, Human Relations55(12): 1429–50.
26.
ForceJ. E. (1982) ‘The Changing Nature of Nietzsche’s Gods and the Architect’s Conquest of Gravity’, Journal of the History of Philosophy20(2): 179–95.
27.
FoucaultM. (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Penguin.
28.
FoucaultM. (2002) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge Classics.
29.
FoucaultM.GordonC. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
30.
FoxN. J. (2003) ‘Practice-based Evidence: Towards Collaborative and Transgressive Research’, Sociology37: 81–102.
31.
FuchsC. (2009) ‘A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Transnational Informational Capitalism’, Rethinking Marxism21(3): 387–402.
32.
GoodingD. C. (2000) ‘Experiment’, in Newton-SmithW. H. (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, pp. 117–26. London: Blackwell.
33.
HammersleyM. (2001) ‘On “Systematic” Reviews of Research Literatures: A Narrative Reply to Evans and Benefield’, British Educational Research Journal27: 543–54.
34.
HassardJ.KelemenM. (2002) ‘Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the Paradigms Debate’, Organization9(2): 331–55.
35.
HegelG. W. F. (1830/1991) The Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. GeraetsT. F.SuchtingW. A.HarrisH. S.Cambridge: Hackett.
36.
HewisonA. (2004) ‘Evidence-based Management in the NHS: Is It Possible?’, Journal of Health Organization and Management18: 336–48.
HollingdaleR. J. (1977) A Nietzsche Reader. London: Penguin.
39.
HopeT. (2004) ‘Pretend It Works: Evidence and Governance in the Evaluation of the Reducing Burglary Initiative’, Criminal Justice4: 287–308.
40.
HubbardR.VetterD. E.LittleE. L. (1998) ‘Replication in Strategic Management: Scientific Testing for Validity, Generalizability, and Usefulness’, Strategic Management Journal19: 243–54.
41.
KilduffM. (2006) ‘Publishing Theory’, Academy of Management Review31(2): 252–55.
42.
KuhnT. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
43.
LatourB. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
LatourB. (2007) Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
LawlerE. E. (2007) ‘Why HR Practices Are Not Evidence-Based’, Academy of Management Journal50(5): 1033–36.
46.
LearmonthM. (2006) ‘Is There Such a Thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? A Commentary on Rousseau’s 2005 Presidential Address’, Academy of Management Review31(4): 1089–91.
47.
LearmonthM. (2008) ‘Evidence-Based Management: A Backlash Against Pluralism in Organization Studies?’, Organization15(2): 283–91.
48.
LearmonthM. (2009) ‘Rhetoric and Evidence: The Case of Evidence-Based Management’, in BuchananD.BrymanA. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, pp. 93–109. London: Sage.
49.
LearmonthM.HardingN. (2006) ‘Evidence-based Management: The Very Idea’, Public Administration84: 245–66.
50.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R.HoltomB. C.McDanielL. S.HillJ. W. (1999) ‘The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Turnover: A Replication and Extension’, Academy of Management Journal42(4): 450–62.
51.
Liberal Democrats (2010) Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010. London: Chris Fox.
52.
LockeS. (2001) ‘Sociology and the Public Understanding of Science: From Rationalization to Rhetoric’, British Journal of Sociology52(1): 1–18.
53.
McKinleyW.MoneW. A.MoonG. (1999) ‘Determinants and Development of Schools in Organization Theory’, Academy of Management Review24(4): 634–48.
54.
McLaughlinJ. (2001) ‘Evidence Based Medicine and Risk: Rhetorical Resources in the Articulation of Professional Identity’, Journal of Management in Medicine15: 352–63.
55.
MarchJ. G. (2003) ‘Parochialism in the Evolution of a Research Community: The Case of Organization Studies’, Academy of Management Conference, Keynote Address. Seattle.
56.
MayC. (2005) ‘Methodological Pluralism, British Sociology and the Evidence-based State: A Reply to Payne et al.’, Sociology39(3): 519–28.
57.
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001) ‘Building Better Theory: Time and the Specification of When Things Happen’, Academy of Management Review26(4): 530–47.
58.
MoneM. A.McKinleyW. (1993) ‘The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organizational Studies’, Journal of Management Inquiry2(3): 284–96.
59.
MorrellK. (2008) ‘The Narrative of Evidence Based Management: A Polemic’, Journal of Management Studies45: 613–35.
60.
NeuliepJ. W., ed. (1991) Replication Research in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
61.
NeuliepJ. W.CrandallR. (1991) ‘Editorial Bias Against Replication Research’, in NeuliepJ. W. (ed.) Replication Research in the Social Sciences, pp. 85–90. London: Sage.
62.
NietzscheF. (1871/1993) The Birth of Tragedy, trans WhitesideS.London: Penguin.
63.
NietzscheF. (1886/1993) Attempt at Self Criticism, trans WhitesideS., in NietzscheF., The Birth of Tragedy, pp. 3–12. London: Penguin.
64.
NietzscheF. (1888/1990) Twilight of the Idols, trans. HollingdaleR.London: Penguin.
65.
ParkerM. (2003) ‘Ethics, Politics and Organizing’, Organization10(2): 187–203.
PawsonR. (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
68.
PfefferJ. (1993) ‘Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable’, Academy of Management Review18(4): 599–620.
69.
PfefferJ. (1997) New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Halftruths, and Total Nonsense. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
71.
PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2007) ‘Suppose We Took Evidence-based Management Seriously: Implications for Reading and Writing Management’, Academy of Management Learning and Education6(1): 153–55.
72.
PorterJ. I. (1995) ‘The Invention of Dionysus and the Platonic Midwife: Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy33(3): 681–86.
73.
PopperK. R. (1962) Conjectures and Refutations. New York, NY: Basic Books.
74.
PotterJ. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
75.
ReayT.BertaW.KohnM. K. (2009) ‘What’s the Evidence on Evidence-based Management?’, Academy of Management Perspectives23(4): 5–18.
76.
RosenthalB. (2004) ‘Losev’s Development Of Themes From Nietzsche’s The Birth Of Tragedy’, Studies in East European Thought56: 187–209.
77.
RousseauD. M. (2006a) ‘Is There Such a Thing as Evidence-based Management?’, Academy of Management Review31: 256–59.
78.
RousseauD. M. (2006b) ‘Keeping an Open Mind About Evidence-based Management: A Reply to Learmonth’s Commentary’, Academy of Management Review31(4): 1091–93.
79.
SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M.GrayJ. A. M.HaynesR. B.RichardsonW. S. (1996) ‘Evidence Based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn’t’, British Medical Journal312: 71–72.
80.
SchopenhauerA. (1819/1969) The World as Will and Representation, trans PayneE.New York, NY: Dover Edition.
81.
ShillabeerA.BussT. F.RousseauD. M. (2011) Evidence-based Public Management: Practices, Issues, and Prospects. New York, NY: M. E.Sharpe.
82.
StratiA.de MontouxP. G. (2002) ‘Organizing Aesthetics’, Human Relations55(7): 755–66.
83.
TannerM. (1993) ‘Introduction’, in The Birth of Tragedy, NietzscheF. (1871/1993), vii–xxx. London: Penguin.
84.
TannerM. (1994) Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85.
TenbenselT. (2004) ‘The Implications of Explicit Priority-setting in New Zealand’s Health Policy and Evidence-based Policy’, Policy Studies25: 189–208.
86.
ThorpeC. (2001) ‘Science Against Modernism: The Relevance of the Social Theory of Michael Polanyi’, British Journal of Sociology52(1): 19–35.
87.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003) ‘Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review’, British Journal of Management14: 207–22.
88.
Van MaanenJ. (1995) ‘Style as Theory’, Organization Science6(1): 133–43.
89.
WalsheK.RundallT. G. (2001) ‘Evidence Based Management: From Theory to Practice in Health Care’, The Millbank Quarterly79: 429–57.
90.
WeickK. E. (1989) ‘Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination’, Academy of Management Review14(9): 516–31.
91.
WeickK. E. (1999) ‘Theory Construction as Disciplined Reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s’, Academy of Management Review24(4): 797–806.
92.
WhettenD. A. (1989) ‘What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?’, Academy of Management Review14(4): 490–95.
93.
WinfreeJ. K. (2003) ‘Before the Subject: Rereading The Birth of Tragedy’, The Journal of Nietzsche Studies25(1): 58–77.
94.
WorrenN.MooreK.ElliottR. (2002) ‘When Theories Become Tools: Toward a Framework for Pragmatic Validity’, Human Relations55(10): 1227–50.
95.
YoungK.AshbyD.BoazA.GraysonL. (2002) ‘Social Science and The Evidence-based Policy Movement’, Social Policy and Society1(1): 215–24.
96.
ZaldM. N. (1996) ‘More Fragmentation? Unfinished Business in Linking the Social Sciences and the Humanities’, Administrative Science Quarterly41: 251–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
