Attempts to make Carl Gustav Jung’s theory of archetypes scientifically credible tend to invoke biology and evolution theory. These convey faith in the power of science (scientism), taken here as a cultural metanarrative. The essay provides a critical appraisal of both biology-oriented and culture-oriented trends in Jungian studies, and steers the conceptualization of archetypes towards issues of embodied subjectivity and narrativity. Thematic parallels between transhumanism, on the one side, and the rebirth archetype as described by Jung, on the other, serve as a case in point.
AdamsM. V. (2006). The Islamic cultural unconscious in the dreams of a contemporary Muslim man. Journal of Jungian Theory and Practice, 8(1), 31–40. http://www.jungnewyork.com/islamic.shtml.
BaydalaA.SmytheW. E. (2012). Hermeneutics of continuity: Theorizing psychological understandings of ancient literature. Theory and Psychology, 22(6), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354312446648
4.
BeckerD. V.NeubergS. L. (2019). Archetypes reconsidered as emergent outcomes of cognitive complexity and evolved motivational systems. Psychological Inquiry, 30(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1614795
5.
BlomfieldS. (1940). The chosen highway. Bahai Publishing.
6.
BoydR. L.PascaP.Conroy-BeamD. (2019). You’re only Jung once: Building generalized motivational systems theories using contemporary research on language. Psychological Inquiry, 30(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1633122
BrewsterF. (2019). Childhood Innocence: Racial prejudice and the shaping of psychological complexes. Psychological Perspectives, 62(2–3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2019.1624439
9.
BrookeR. (2009). Jung and phenomenology. Trivium Publications. (originally published in 1991).
10.
BrunerJ. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
11.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In BarkowJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 163–228). Oxford University Press.
12.
FerrignoS.Jara-EttingerJ.PiantadosiS. T.CantlonJ. F. (2017). Universal and uniquely human factors in spontaneous number perception. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13968.
13.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
14.
GoodwynE. (2013). Recurrent motifs as resonant attractor states in the narrative field: A testable model of archetype. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 58(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12020
15.
GoodwynE. (2019). Comments on the 2018 IAAP conference on archetype theory: Defending a non-reductive biological approach. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64(5), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12543
16.
GorfinkleJ. I. (1912). The eight chapters of Maimonides on ethics. Columbia University Press.
17.
GuoR.ShenH.ZhangY.WuB. (2019). Representations and symbols of Kuafu’s myth in analytical psychology and Chinese culture: History vs. contemporary, consciousness vs. unconscious, collective vs. individual. Culture and Psychology, 25(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18804122
18.
HatfieldF. (2019). Caught in the net of the divine: Archetypal roots of Alcoholics anonymous in euripides’s Bacchae. Jung Journal, 13(4), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19342039.2019.1676144
19.
HendersonJ. (1990). Shadow and self. Chiron Press.
20.
HogensonG. B. (2001). The baldwin effect: A neglected influence on C. G. Jung’s evolutionary thinking. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46(4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00269
21.
HogensonG. B. (2019). The controversy around the concept of archetypes. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64(5), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12541
JungC. G. (1919). Psychology of the unconscious. (B.M. Hinkle, Trans.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubnner and Co. (original work published 1912).
29.
JungC. G. (1956). Symbols of transformation. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans., Vol.5 [whole volume]). Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1952).
30.
JungC. G. (1959a). Concerning rebirth. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 9i, pp. 113–181). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1950).
31.
JungC. G. (1959b). Psychological aspects of the mother archetype. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans(Vol.9i, pp. 75–111). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1954).
32.
JungC. G. (1959c). The concept of the collective unconscious. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 9i, pp. 42–53). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1936).
33.
JungC. G. (1960a). Instinct and the unconscious. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 8, pp. 129–138). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1948).
34.
JungC. G. (1960b). Psychological factors determining human behaviour. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 8, pp. 114–125). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1937).
35.
JungC. G. (1960c). On the nature of the psyche. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 8, pp. 159–234). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1954).
36.
JungC. G. (1960d). A review of the complex theory. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 8, pp. 92–104). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1948).
37.
JungC. G. (1964). Approaching the unconscious. In JungC. G.von FranzM.-L. (Eds.), Man and his symbols (pp. 18–103). Aldus.
38.
JungC. G. (1966). The complications of American psychology. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol.10, pp. 502–524). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1930).
39.
JungC. G. (1969). A psychological approach to the dogma of the trinity. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans (Vol. 11, pp. 107–200). Routledge and Kegan Paul (original work published 1948).
40.
JungC. G. (1971). Psychological types. In AdlerG.FordhamM.ReadH. (Eds), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R.F.C. Hull, Trans., Vol.6 [whole volume]). Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1921).
41.
KimblesS. (2014). Phantom narratives. Rowman and Littlefield.
KurzweilR. (2005). The singularity is near. Viking Penguin.
44.
LevinS. B. (2021). Posthuman bliss?Oxford University Press.
45.
LuK. (2013). Can individual psychology explain social phenomena? An appraisal of the theory of cultural complexes. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 18(4), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2012.43
46.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition. Manchester University Press.
47.
MaloneyA. (2003). Archetype theory, evolutionary psychology and the Baldwin effect. A commentary on Hogenson’s paper. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res
48.
McDowellM. J. (2001). Principle of organization: A dynamic-systems view of the archetype-as-such. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46(4), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00271
49.
MerchantJ. (2019). The controversy around the concept of archetypes and the place for an emergent/developmental model. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12542
50.
NeumannE. (1959). Art and the creative unconscious. Princeton University Press.
51.
OksanaY.MilesP.IndhushreeR.BujkoB.ThomasD. (2016). Cultural unconscious in research: Integrating multicultural and depth paradigms in qualitative research. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 61(5), 656–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12257
52.
RamzyN. S. (2021). Concept cathedral and ‘squaring the circle’: Interpreting the Gothic cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris as a standing hymn. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(2), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.001
53.
RichardsonM. K.MinelliA.CoatesM. I. (1999). Some problems with typological thinking in evolution and development. Evolution and Development, 1(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.00112.x
54.
RoeslerC. (2012). Are archetypes transmitted more by culture than biology? Questions arising from conceptualizations of the archetype. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 57(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01963.x
SingerT. (2006). Unconscious forces shaping international conflicts: Archetypal defenses of the group spirit from revolutionary America to confrontation in the Middle East. San Francisco Jung Institute Library Journal, 25(4), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/jung.1.2006.25.4.6
57.
SingerT. (2013). Response to kevin Lu’s “can individual psychology explain social phenomena? An appraisal of the theory of cultural complexes”. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 18(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2013.18
58.
SingerT.KaplinskyC. (2010). Cultural complexes in analysis. In SteinM. (Ed.), Jungian psychoanalysis (pp. 22–37). Open Court.
SteinM. (2013). A lecture for the end of time – “concerning rebirth”. In KirschJ.SteinM. (Eds.), How and why we still read Jung (pp. 26–45). Routledge.
61.
StevensA. (1982). Archetype. William Morrow and Co.
WeberM. (2009). Science as a vocation. In GerthH. H.MillsW. C. (Eds.), Max weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–159). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1919).
