Present research on minor party performance consists largely of single-country studies or pooled studies including a raft of widely varying electoral systems. This study examines the topic from a cross-national perspective, but is limited to democratic polities with single-member districts and first-past-the-post rules. An original dataset is compiled including 217 elections drawn from 37 countries and several historical eras. Five political-institutional factors are explored: (1) federalism, (2) presidentialism, (3) electoral system institutionalization, (4) party organization, and (5) electoral volatility. The evidence suggests that major party hegemony is more complete in polities with unitary constitutions, parliamentary executives, long-enduring electoral systems, strong party organization and low electoral volatility.
Abramson, Paul R. , John H. Aldrich , Phil Paolino and David W. Rohde (1995) ‘Third-Party and Independent Candidates in American Politics: Wallace, Anderson, and Perot’ , Political Science Quarterly110: 3 .
2.
Alesina, Alberto , Arnaud Devleeschauwer , William Easterly , Sergio Kurlat and Romain Wacziarg (2002) Fractionalization. Harvard University, Department of Economics .
3.
Alvarez, Mike , Jose Antonio Cheibub , Fernando Limongi and Adam Przeworski (1999) ACLP Political and Economic Database and ACLP Political and Economic Database Codebook (May).
4.
Arellano, Manuel (2003) Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
5.
Aucoin, Peter (1985a) ‘Regionalism, Party and National Government’, in Peter Aucoin (ed.) Party Government and Regional Representation in Canada, pp. 137-160. Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
6.
Aucoin, Peter (ed.) (1985b) Party Government and Regional Representation in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
7.
Bakvis, Herman and William M. Chandler (1987) Federalism and the Role of the State. Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
8.
Banks, Arthur S. (1994) ‘Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive’, Center for Social Analysis, State University of New York at Binghamton, New York . (Some variables from this database were on the Easterly and Levine dataset, and hence have been incorporated in the dataset.)
9.
Banks, Arthur S. , William Overstreet and Thomas Muller (eds) (1992) Political Handbook of the World 1992. Binghamton: CSA Publishers, State University of New York .
10.
Beck, Nathaniel (2001) ‘Time-Series Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Last Few Years?’Annual Review of Political Science4: 271-293 .
11.
Beck, Nathaniel and Jonathan Katz (1995) ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics’ , American Political Science Review89: 634-647 .
12.
Beck, Thorsten , George Clarke , Alberto Groff , Philip Keefer and Patrick Walsh (2000) ‘New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, Policy Research Working Paper 2283. Washington: World Bank, Development Research Group .
13.
Blais, Andre (1973) ‘Third Parties in Canadian Provincial Politics’ , Canadian Journal of Political Science6: 422-438 .
14.
Bryce, James (1888/1891) The American Commonwealth, 2 vols. Chicago, IL: Charles H. Sergel .
15.
Carey, John M. (2000) ‘Party Unity in Legislative Voting’ . Paper presented to the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC (August-September).
16.
Chandler, William (1987) ‘Federalism and Political Parties’, in Herman Bakvis and William M. Chandler (eds) Federalism and the Role of the State, pp. 149-170. Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
17.
Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Ken Kollman (1998) ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’ , American Political Science Review92(June): 329-342 .
18.
Chressanthis, George A. and Stephen D. Shaffer (1993) ‘Major Party Failure and Third-Party Voting in Presidential Elections, 1976-1988’ , Social Science Quarterly74: 265-273 .
19.
Delury, George E. (ed.) (1999) World Encyclopedia of Political Systems and Parties, 3 vols. New York: Facts on File .
20.
Derbyshire, J. Denis and Ian Derbyshire (1996) Political Systems of the World. New York: St. Martin’s Press .
21.
Diamond, Larry (1999) Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
22.
Duverger, Maurice (1951/1959) Political Parties. New York: John Wiley .
23.
Easterly, William and Ross Levine (1997) ‘Africa’s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions’ , Quarterly Journal of Economics112: 1203-1250 .
24.
Elazar, Daniel J. (ed.) (1991) Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements. Detroit, MI: Gale Research .
25.
Epstein, Leon D. (1986) Parties in the American Mold. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press .
26.
Fisher, Stephen L. (1973) ‘The Wasted Vote Thesis’ , Comparative Politics5: 293-299 .
27.
Foweraker, Joe (1998) ‘Review Article: Institutional Design, Party Systems and Governability: Differentiating the Presidential Regimes of Latin America’ , British Journal of Political Science28: 651-676 .
28.
Gabel, Matthew J. (1995) ‘The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the 1990 Hungarian Elections’ , Comparative Politics27(2): 205-214 .
29.
Gienapp, William (1987) The Origins of the Republican Party 1852-56. New York: Oxford University Press .
30.
Gillespie, J. David (1993) Politics at the Periphery: Third Parties in Two-Party America. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press .
31.
Gimpel, James (1996) National Elections and the Autonomy of American State Elections. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press .
32.
Goertz, Gary (1994) Contexts of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
33.
Gold, Howard Jonah (1995) ‘Third Party Voting in Presidential Elections: A Study of Perot, Anderson, and Wallace’ , Political Research Quarterly48(4): 751-773 .
34.
Golder, Matt (2003) ‘Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946-2000’. Manuscript, Department of Politics, New York University .
35.
Gunther, Richard (1989) ‘Electoral Laws, Party Systems, and Elites: The Case of Spain’ , American Political Science Review83: 835-858 .
36.
Haggard, Stephan and Mathew D. McCubbins (eds) (2001) Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
37.
Harmel, Robert (1985) ‘On the Study of New Parties’ , International Political Science Review6: 501-523 .
38.
Harmel, Robert and John D. Robertson (1985) ‘Formation and Success of New Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’ , International Political Science Review6: 501-523 .
39.
Herring, Pendleton (1940) The Politics of Democracy: American Parties in Action. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
40.
Herrnson, Paul S. and John C. Green (eds) (1997) Multiparty Politics in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
41.
Hesseltine, William (1948) The Rise and Fall of Third Parties. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press .
42.
Hesseltine, William (1962) Third-Party Movements in the United States. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand .
43.
Hicken, Allen and Yuko Kasuya (2001) ‘A Guide to the Constitutional Structures and Electoral Systems of East, South, and Southeast Asia’ , Electoral Studies22(1): 121-151 .
44.
Holcombe, Arthur N. (1924) The Political Parties of To-day. New York: Harper & Bros .
45.
Holt, Michael F. (1999) The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press .
46.
Janda, Kenneth and Anthony King (1985) ‘Formalizing and Testing Duverger’s Theories on Political Parties’ , Comparative Political Studies18(2): 139-169 .
47.
Jones, Mark P. (1993) ‘The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in Latin America and the Caribbean’ , Electoral Studies12: 59-75 .
48.
Jones, Mark P. (1994) ‘Presidential Election Laws and Multipartism in Latin America’ , Political Research Quarterly47: 41-58 .
49.
Jones, Mark P. (1995a) Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press .
50.
Jones, Mark P. (1995b) ‘A Guide to the Electoral Systems of the Americas’ , Electoral Studies14: 5-21 .
51.
Jones, Mark P. (1997) ‘Federalism and the Number of Parties in Argentine Congressional Elections’ , Journal of Politics59: 538-549 .
52.
Katz, Richard S. (1980) A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
53.
Key, V. O., Jr. (1958) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 4th edn.New York: Thomas Y. Crowell .
54.
Kruschke, Earl R. (1991) Encyclopedia of Third Parties in the United States. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO .
55.
Kuenzi, Michelle and Gina Lambright (2001) ‘Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries’ , Party Politics7: 437-468 .
56.
Levitsky, Steven (2001) ‘Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: The Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective’ , World Politics54: 27-56 .
57.
Lijphart, Arend (1990) ‘The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945-85: A Re-Analysis and Update of Rae’s Classic Study’ , American Political Science Review84: 481-496 .
58.
Lijphart, Arend (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
59.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1968) Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan. A Study in Political Sociology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co.
60.
Mainwaring, Scott and Matthew J. Shugart (eds) (1997) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
61.
Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy Scully (eds) (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
62.
Mauro, Paolo (1995) ‘Corruption and Growth’ , Quarterly Journal of Economics110: 681-712 .
63.
Mazmanian, Daniel A. (1974) Third Parties in Presidential Elections. Washington, DC: Brookings .
64.
McHenry, Dean E. (1950) The Third Force in Canada. The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation, 1932-1948. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
65.
McHenry, Dean E. (1997) ‘Federalism in Africa: Is it a Solution to, or a Cause of, Ethnic Problems?’ Presented at the annual meetings of the African Studies Association, Columbus, OH (November).
66.
Merriam, Charles Edward (1922) The American Party System. New York: Macmillan .
67.
Miller, Warren E. and J. Merrill Shanks (1996) The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
68.
Nash, Howard, Jr. (1959) Third Parties in American Politics. Washington, DC: Public Affairs .
69.
Nohlen, Dieter (ed.) (1993) Enciclopedia Electoral Latinoamericana y del Caribe. San Jose, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.
70.
Nohlen, Dieter , Michael Krennerich and Berhard Thibaut (eds) (1999) Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
71.
Nohlen, Dieter , Florian Grotz and Christof Harmann (eds) (2002) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook, vols 1-2. New York: Oxford University Press .
72.
Ordeshook, Peter C. and Olga V. Shvetsova (1994) ‘Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties’ , American Journal of Political Science38: 100-123 .
73.
Pedersen, M. N. (1983) ‘The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems: Explorations in Explanation’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems. London: Sage .
74.
Pinard, Maurice (1971) The Rise of a Third Party: A Study in Crisis Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
75.
Posner, Daniel (2000) ‘Measuring Ethnic Identities and Attitudes Regarding Intergroup Relations: Methodological Pitfalls and a New Technique’ . Presented at the Fall 2000 Meeting of the Laboratory in Comparative Ethnic Processes (LiCEP), University of Pennsylvania.
76.
Rae, Douglas (1967) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
77.
Reed, Stephen (1990) ‘Structure and Behavior: Extending Duverger’s Law’ , British Journal of Political Science20: 335-356 .
78.
Reynolds, Andrew and Ben Reilly (1997) The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design. Stockholm: Information Services, International IDEA .
79.
Riker, William H. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston, MA: Little, Brown .
80.
Riker, William H. (1976) ‘The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law’ , Comparative Politics9: 93-106 .
81.
Riker, William H. (1982) ‘The Two-party System and Duverger’s Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science’ , American Political Science Review76(December): 753-766 .
82.
Roberts, Kenneth M. and Erik Wibbels (1999) ‘Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations’ , American Political Science Review93: 575-590 .
83.
Rockwood, D. Stephen , Cecelia Brown , Kenneth Eshleman and Deborah Shaffer (1985) American Third Parties Since the Civil War. New York: Garland Publishing .
84.
Rosenstone, Steven J. , Roy L. Behr and Edward H. Lazarus (1984) Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
85.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart .
86.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston .
87.
Shamir, Michael (1985) ‘Changes in Electoral Systems as “Interventions”: Another Test of Duverger’s Hypothesis’ , European Journal of Political Research13: 1-10 .
88.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and John M. Carey (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press .
89.
Sorauf, Frank J. (1964) Political Parties in the American System. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
90.
Spafford, Duff (1972) ‘Electoral Systems and Voters’ Behavior’ , Comparative Politics5(1): 129-134 .
91.
Taagepera, Rein and Bernard Grofman (1985) ‘Rethinking Duverger’s Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems - Parties Minus Issues Equals 1’ , European Journal of Political Research14: 431-452 .
92.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew S. Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
93.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew S. Shugart (1993) ‘Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect’ , American Political Science Review87: 455-464 .
94.
Ter-Minassian, Teresa (ed.) (1997) Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund .
95.
Valelly, Richard M. (1989) Radicalism in the States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
96.
Vanhanen, Tatu (1990) The Process of Democratization: A Comparative Study of 147 States, 1980-88. New York: Crane Russak .
97.
Watts, Ronald (1997) Comparing Federal Systems in the 1990s. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press .
98.
Weaver, R. Kent (2002) ‘Electoral Rules and Governability’ , Journal of Democracy13(April): 111-125 .
99.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2001) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
