One of the ways in which support for right-wing populist parties is held to be distinctive from that for other kinds of political parties is that their leaders are alleged to be ‘charismatic’ figures who play a crucial role in the electoral success their parties have enjoyed. Focusing on three Dutch elections, this article tests the charismatic leadership hypothesis, asking whether leader effects are stronger for populist than for established parties and whether they are stronger for populist leaders who are widely held to be more rather than less charismatic. The results indicate that if, following Weber, charisma is seen as an intimate and direct bond between leaders and followers, there is in fact little support for the charismatic leadership hypothesis, at least in the context of leaders shaping electoral outcomes. While recognizing that charisma may manifest itself in other, perhaps indirect, ways, there would seem to us at the very least to be a need for the notion of charisma to be conceptualized more rigorously if it is to continue to be used as an explanation of right-wing populist party success.
Anker, Hans (1995) ‘Kiezers, politici en partijkeuze’, in J. J. M. van Holsteyn and B. Niemöller (eds) De Nederlandse Kiezer, 1994. Leiden: DSWO Press.
2.
Betz, Hans-Georg (1998) ‘Introduction’, in Hans-Georg Betz and Stefan Immerfall (eds) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
3.
Canovan, Margaret (1999) ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’ , Political Studies47: 2-16 .
4.
Charlot, Jean (1971) The Gaullist Phenomenon. London: Allen & Unwin .
5.
Clarke, Harold D. , David Sanders , Marianne Stewart and Paul Whiteley (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
6.
Dros, Lodewijk (2002) ‘De dood van een Messias; “Komt tot mij”; Pim Fortuyn’ , Trouw, 8 May 2002, p. 12-12 .
7.
Eatwell, Roger (2003) ‘Ten Theories of the Extreme Right’, in Peter Merkl and L. Weinberg (eds) Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-first Century. London: Frank Cass .
8.
Eatwell, Roger and Cas Mudde (eds) (2004) Western Democracies and the New Extreme Right Challenge. London: Routledge .
9.
Ephimenco, Sylvain (1998) ‘Touwslipper’ , Trouw, 16 May 1998, p. 2-2 .
10.
Hainsworth, Paul (ed.) (2000) The Politics of the Extreme Right: From the Margins to the Mainstream. London: Pinter .
11.
Immerfall, Stefan (1998) ‘Conclusion: The Neo-Populist Agenda’, in Hans-Georg Betz and Stefan Immerfall (eds) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
12.
Irwin, Galen A. and Joop van Holsteyn (1989) ‘Towards a More Open Model of Competition’ , West European Politics12: 112-138 .
13.
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2005) ‘The Vulnerable Populist Right Parties: No Economic Realignment Fuelling Their Electoral Success’ , European Journal of Political Research44: 465-492 .
14.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
15.
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, Dirk Oegema, Jan A. de Ridder, Anita van Hoof and Rens Vliegenthart (2003) De puinhopen in het nieuws. De rol van de media bij de Tweede-Kamerverkiezingen van 2002. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
16.
Kriesi, Hans (1999) ‘Movements of the Left, Movements of the Right: Putting the Mobilization of Two New Types of Social Movements into Political Context’, in H. Kitschelt , P. Lange and G. Marks (eds) Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Kroh, Martin and Cees van der Eijk (2003) ‘Utilities, Preferences and Choice’ . Paper presented at the joint sessions of workshops of the ECPR in Edinburgh, March 2003.
18.
Macdonald, Stuart E. , Ola Listhaug and George Rabinowitz (1991) ‘Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems’ , American Political Science Review85: 1107-1131 .
19.
Madsen, Douglas and Peter Snow (1991) The Charismatic Bond: Political Behavior in Time of Crisis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
20.
Mény, Yves and Yves Surel (eds) (2002) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
21.
Merkl, Peter H. and Leonrad Weinberg (eds) (2003) Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. London: Frank Cass .
22.
Mudde, Cas and Joop J. M. van Holsteyn (2000) ‘The Netherlands: Explaining the Limited Success of the Extreme Right’, in P. Hainsworth (ed.) The Politics of the Extreme Right. From the Margins to the Mainstream, pp. 144-171. London and New York: Pinter .
23.
Mughan, Anthony (2000) Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections. New York: Palgrave .
24.
Mughan, Anthony and Pamela Paxton (2006) ‘Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia’ , British Journal of Political Science36: 341-358 .
25.
Rabinowitz, George and Stuart E. Macdonald (1989) ‘A Directional Theory of Issue Voting’ , American Political Science Review83: 93-121 .
26.
Schmitt, Hermann (2001) Politische Repräsentation in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus .
27.
Stimson, James A. (1985) ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay’ , American Journal of Political Science29: 914-947 .
28.
Taggart, Paul (2000) Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press .
29.
Tillie, Jean (1995) Party Utility and Voting Behaviour. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis .
30.
Van der Brug, Wouter (2003) ‘How the LPF Fuelled Discontent: Empirical Tests of Explanations of LPF Support’ , Acta Politica38: 89-106 .
31.
Van der Brug, Wouter (2004) ‘Issue Ownership and Party Choice’ , Electoral Studies23: 209-233 .
32.
Van der Brug, Wouter , Meindert Fennema and Jean Tillie (2000) ‘Anti-Immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote?’ , European Journal of Political Research37: 77-102 .
33.
Van der Brug, Wouter , Meindert Fennema and Jean Tillie (2005) ‘Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-Step Model of Electoral Support’ , Comparative Political Studies38: 537-573 .
34.
Van der Brug, Wouter and Meindert Fennema (2003) ‘Protest or Mainstream? How the European Anti-Immigrant Parties Have Developed into Two Separate Groups by 1999’ , European Journal of Political Research42: 55-76 .
35.
Van der Eijk, Cees (2002) ‘Design Issues in Electoral Research: Taking Care of (Core) Business’ , Electoral Studies21: 189-206 .
36.
Van der Eijk, Cees , Wouter van der Brug , Martin Kroh and Mark Franklin (2006) ‘Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Electoral Behavior -On the Measurement and Analysis of Utilities’ , Electoral Studies25: 424-447 .
37.
Van der Eijk, Cees and Mark Franklin (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
38.
Van der Eijk, Cees , Mark Franklin and Wouter van der Brug (1999) ‘Policy Preferences and Party Choice’, in H. Schmitt and J. Thomassen (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
39.
Van Holsteyn, Joop J. M. and Galen A. Irwin (2003) ‘Never a Dull Moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch Parliamentary Election of 2002’ , West European Politics26: 41-66 .
40.
Van Wijnen, Pieter (1999) ‘The Role of Policy Preferences in the Dutch National Elections of 1998’ , Acta Politica34: 200-235 .
41.
Van Wijnen, Pieter (2000) ‘Candidates and Voting Behaviour’ , Acta Politica35: 430-458 .
42.
Voerman, Gerrit and Paul Lucardie (1992) ‘The Extreme Right of the Netherlands: The Centrists and Their Radical Rivals’ , European Journal of Political Research22: 35-54 .
43.
Westholm, Anders (1997) ‘Distance Versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice’ , American Political Science Review91: 865-883 .
44.
Whitten, Guy D. and Harvey D. Palmer (1996) ‘Heightening Comparativists’ Concern for Model Choice -Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands’ , American Journal of Political Science40: 231-260 .
