In multi-level systems, state-wide parties are faced with particular challenges. Competing in elections on multiple levels of the polity, such parties juggle the desire for national recognizability and the need to be responsive to regional particularities. In this paper, I reflect on the delegation model of multi-level party politics, which is a theoretical perspective of great importance in the literature, arguing that the accuracy of the model depends on two critical assumptions. Based on these theoretical considerations, I develop the model further and apply it to the case of the two main Spanish state-wide parties, the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE) and the Partido Popular (PP). More specifically, the programmatic positions of their regional branches are analyzed, and it is shown that the framework manifestos issued by the national party organizations shape these to a large extent. While this case is used to illustrate the illuminating potential of the extended delegation model, the paper is similarly attentive to the limitations of the model and also hints at the implications for our conception of democracy in multi-level systems.
AdamsJ (2012) Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science15: 401–419.
2.
AdamsJSomer-TopcuZ (2009) Moderate now, win votes later: The electoral consequences of parties’ policy shifts in 25 postwar democracies. Journal of Politics71
(2): 678–692.
3.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowLGlasgowG (2004) Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science34
(4): 589–610.
4.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowLGlasgowG (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science50
(3): 513–529.
5.
AdamsJMerrillS IIIGrofmanB (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
AlonsoSGómezB (2011) Partidos nacionales en elecciones regionales: ¿Coherencia territorial o programas a la carta?Revista de Estudios Políticos152: 183–209.
7.
AlonsoSGómezBCabezaL (2013) Measuring centre-periphery preferences: The regional manifestos project. Regional and Federal Studies23
(2): 189–211.
8.
BäckHDebusMMüllerJBäckH (2013) Regional government formation in varying multilevel contexts: A comparison of eight European countries. Regional Studies47
(3): 368–387.
9.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsEHoogheLJollySMarksGPolkJRovnyJSteenbergenMVachudovaMA (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics1
(1): 143–152.
10.
BenoitKLaverMJ (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
11.
BenoitKLaverMJ (2008) Compared to what? A comment on ‘A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text’ by Martin and Vanberg. Political Analysis16
(1): 101–111.
12.
BolleyerN (2012) New party organization in Western Europe: Of party hierarchies, stratarchies and federations. Party Politics18
(3): 315–336.
13.
BräuningerTDebusM (2012) Parteienwettbewerb in den deutschen Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
14.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Party competition – selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In: DaalderHMairP (eds) Western European Party Systems. Continuity & Change. London: Sage, pp.267–305.
15.
BudgeIKlingemannH-DVolkensABaraJTanenbaumE (eds) (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
CartyRK (2004) Parties as franchise systems. The stratarchical organizational imperative. Party Politics10
(1): 5–24.
17.
CastlesFGWildenmannR (eds) (1986) Visions and Realities of Party Government. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
18.
DebusMMüllerJObertP (2011) Europeanization and government formation in multi-level systems: Evidence from the Czech Republic. European Union Politics12
(3): 381–403.
19.
DeschouwerK (2003) Political parties in multi-layered systems. European Urban and Regional Studies10
(3): 213–226.
20.
DeschouwerK (2006) Political parties as multi-level organizations. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp.291–300.
21.
DownsA (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy65
(2): 135–150.
22.
DownsWM (1998) Coalition Government, Subnational Style. Multiparty Politics in Europe’s Regional Parliaments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
23.
FabreE (2011) Measuring party organization: The vertical dimension of the multi-level organization of state-wide parties in Spain and the UK. Party Politics17
(3): 343–363.
24.
FabreEMéndez-LagoM (2009) Decentralization and party organisational change: The British and the Spanish statewide parties compared. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.102–118.
25.
FabreESwendenW (2013) Territorial politics and the statewide party. Regional Studies47
(3): 342–355.
26.
Falcó-GimenoA (2014) Portfolio allocation under decentralization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism44
(1): 205–225.
27.
GigerNMüllerJDebusM (2011) Die Bedeutung des regionalen Kontexts für die programmatische Positionierung von Schweizer Kantonalparteien. Swiss Political Science Review17
(3): 259–285.
28.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority. A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
29.
HopkinJ (2003) Political decentralization, electoral change and party organizational adaptation. A framework for analysis. European Urban and Regional Studies10
(3): 227–237.
30.
KatzRS (1980) A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
KatzRS (2014) No man can serve two masters: Party politicians, party members, citizens and principal-agent models of democracy. Party Politics20
(2): 183–193.
32.
KiewitDRMcCubbinsMD (1991) The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
KlingelhöferTMüllerJ (2015) Consociational and rational coalitions: Norm-based government formation and the case of the Dutch provinces. Acta Politica50
(1): 101–124.
34.
LaffinMShawE (2007) British devolution and the Labour Party: How a national party adapts to devolution. British Journal of Politics and International Relations9
(1): 55–72.
35.
LaverMJBenoitKGarryJ (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review97
(2): 311–331.
36.
LeónS (2014) How does decentralization affect electoral competition of state-wide parties? Evidence from Spain. Party Politics20
(3): 391–402.
37.
LibbrechtLMaddensBSwendenW (2013) Party competition in regional elections: The strategies of state-wide parties in Spain and the United Kingdom. Party Politics19
(4): 624–640.
38.
LibbrechtLMaddensBSwendenWFabreE (2009) Issue salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. European Journal of Political Research48
(1): 58–79.
39.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp.1–64.
40.
MaddensBLibbrechtL (2009) How statewide parties cope with the regionalist issue: The case of Spain; a directional approach. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.204–228.
41.
MeguidBM (2008) Party Competition Between Unequals. Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MüllerJ (2009) The impact of the socio-economic context on the Länder parties’ policy positions. German Politics18
(3): 365–384.
43.
MüllerJ (2013) On a short leash? Sub-national party positions between regional context and national party unity. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties23
(2): 177–199.
44.
RabinowitzGMacdonaldSE (1989) A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review83
(1): 93–121.
45.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8
(1): 3–44.
46.
RobertsGK (1989) Party system change in West Germany: Land-federal linkages. West European Politics12
(4): 98–113.
47.
SnyderJMJrTingMM (2002) An informational rationale for political parties. American Journal of Political Science46
(1): 90–110.
48.
ŞtefuriucI (2009) Introduction: Government coalitions in multi-level settings – institutional determinants and party strategy. Regional and Federal Studies19
(1): 1–12.
49.
ŞtefuriucI (2013) Government Formation in Multi-Level Settings. Party Strategy and Institutional Constraints. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
StrømKMüllerWCBergmannT (2003) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
SwendenWMaddensB (2009) Introduction. Territorial party politics in Western Europe: A framework for analysis. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–30.
52.
TavitsM (2007) Principle vs. pragmatism: Policy shifts and political competition. American Journal of Political Science51
(1): 151–165.
53.
ThorlaksonL (2006) Party systems in multi-level contexts. In: HoughDJefferyC (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.37–53.
54.
ThorlaksonL (2009) Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics15
(2): 157–177.
55.
TsebelisG (1990) Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
van HoutenP (2009a) Multi-level relations in political parties. A delegation approach. Party Politics15
(2): 137–156.
57.
van HoutenP (2009b) Authority in multilevel parties: A principal-agent framework and cases from Germany and Spain. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.167–182.
58.
VolkensA (2007) Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties. Electoral Studies26
(1): 108–120.
59.
WilsonA (2012) Multi-level party systems in Spain. Regional and Federal Studies22
(2): 123–139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
