Party system institutionalization (PSI) is a critical dimension of modern democracies. However, conventional approaches to institutionalization do not include party systems’ ability to adapt and respond to challenges that emanate from society, one of the crucial traits in Huntington’s definition of institutionalization. We discuss conventional approaches to the analysis of PSI. Building upon the idea of social orders put forth by North, Wallis, and Weingast, we argue that the analysis of institutionalization at the level of party systems must consider the system’s ability to provide open access and to include all sectors: that is, the system’s ability to incorporate demands that emanate from society. We propose a new conceptualization and operationalization of PSI, and we present a new data set of PSI indicators for 18 Latin American countries. Finally, we analyze the data to assess the level of PSI and type of party system in each Latin American country.
BielasiakJ (2002) The institutionalization of electoral and party systems in postcommunist states. Comparative Politics34(2): 189–210.
2.
BolleyerNRuthSP (2018) Elite investments in party institutionalization in new democracies: a two-dimensional approach. The Journal of Politics80(1): 288–302.
3.
CastañedaJGMoralesMA (2008) Leftovers: Tales of the Latin American Left. London, New York: Routgledge.
4.
CoppedgeM (1994) Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
CoppedgeM (1998) The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems. Party Politics4(4): 547–568.
6.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSI, et al. (2016) V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v6.2. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
7.
CyrJ (2017) The Fates of Political Parties: Institutional Crisis, Continuity, and Change in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DahlR (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
9.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
10.
GoertzG (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
Hernández NaranjoG (2009) El Sistema de Partidos de Costa Rica 1953 2006. Atlas Electoral de Costa Rica 1953 2006. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales. San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.
12.
HunterW (2010) The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HuntingtonSP (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
JonesM (2005) The role of parties and party systems in the policymaking process. State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes. Washington, DC: IADB.
15.
KuenziMLambrightG (2001) Party system institutionalization in 30 African countries. Party Politics7: 437–468.
16.
LehoucqF (2005) Costa Rica: paradise in doubt. Journal of Democracy16(3): 140–154.
17.
LehoucqF (2012) The Politics of Modern Central America: Civil War, Democratization, and Underdevelopment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LevitskyS (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LevitskySRobertsK (2011) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
LindbergSI (2007) Institutionalization of party systems? Stability and fluidity among legislative parties in Africa’s democracies. Government and Opposition42(2): 215–241.
21.
LunaJP (2014a) Party system institutionalization: do we need a new concept?Studies in Comparative International Development49(4): 403–425.
22.
LunaJP (2014b) Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LunaJPAltmanD (2011) Uprooted but stable: Chilean parties and the concept of party system institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society53(2): 1–28.
24.
LupuN (2013) Party brands and partisanship: theory with evidence from a survey experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science57(1): 49–64.
25.
LupuN (2014) Brand dilution and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America. World Politics66(4): 561–602.
26.
MainwaringS (2016) Party system institutionalization, party collapse and party building. Government and Opposition51(4): 691–716.
27.
MainwaringSScullyT (1995a) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
MainwaringSScullyT (1995b) Introduction: party systems in Latin America. In: MainwaringSScullyT (eds) Building Democratic Institutions. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–36.
29.
MorganJ (2011) Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park: Penn State Press.
30.
MunckGL (2009) Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
MurilloMV (2001) Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MustilloTJ (2007) Entrants in the Political Arena: New Party Trajectories During the Third Wave of Democracy in Latin America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, p. 289.
33.
NorrisP (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
NorthDCWallisJJWeingastBR (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RobertsK (2014) Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SánchezO (2009) Party non-systems: a conceptual innovation. Party Politics15(4): 487–520.
37.
SartoriG (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
38.
SchedlerA (1995) Under-and overinstitutionalization: some ideal typical propositions concerning new and old party systems. South Bend: Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
39.
StocktonH (2001) Political parties, party systems, and democracy in East Asia lessons from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies34(1): 94–119.
40.
StollH (2013) Changing Societies, Changing Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
TavitsM (2008) Party systems in the making: the emergence and success of new parties in new democracies. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 113–133.
42.
ThamesFCRobbinsJW (2007) Party System Institutionalization and the Level of Democracy. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 29–Septemeber 1.
43.
Vargas CullellJ (2007) Costa Rica: fin de una era política. Revista de Ciencia Politica27: 113–128.
44.
WeylandKMadridRHunterW (2010) Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ZuccoC (2010) Stability without roots: party system institutionalization in Brazil. In: SSRN (ed) Working Paper Series. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002359. Accessed March, 2017.
46.
ZuccoC (2015) Estabilidad Sin Raices: La Institucionalización del Sistema de Partidos Brasileño. In: TorcalM (ed) Los problemas de la Institucionalización de los Sistemas de partidos en America Latina. Madrid: Anthropos de Siglo XXI, pp. 78–107.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
