This study empirically examines the spatial interdependency of attractions, using a unique database of 75 important attractions in Guangdong (GD) province, China and spatial econometric models. According to the estimation results, compatible effects apply to the samples in GD overall and in eastern GD, while competitive effects apply to the samples in northern GD. To analyze further, this study finds attraction theme matters to the nature of spatial interdependency. There are competitive effects among natural attraction (NA) and man-made attraction (MA) and insignificant compatible effects among cultural attractions. The competitive effects among NAs have a root in the competition for tourists’ time budget, and competitive effects among MAs are related to product homogeneity, resulting from the ubiquitous product imitation in MAs in China. This study concludes that to distinctly diversify attraction theme is a critical way to generate a positive spatial interdependency among attractions within a certain geographic area.
BaoJG (1994) The spatial competition between the Karst stone forest attractions. Economic Geography14(3): 93–96.
2.
BelsleyDAKuhEWelschRE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. NewYork: JohnWiley.
3.
BuhalisD (2006) The impact of information technology on tourism competition. In: PapatheodorouA (ed), Corporate Rivalry and Market Power, Competition Issues in the Tourism Industry. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 143–171.
4.
CromptonJLGitelsonRJ (1979) The theory of cumulative attraction and compatibility: A case study of two major commercial leisure enterprises. Baylor Business Studies10(1): 7–16.
5.
ElhorstJP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review26(3): 244–268.
6.
FranzeseRJJrHaysJC (2007) Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis15(2): 140–164.
7.
Garín MunosT (2006) Inbound international tourism to Canary Islands: A dynamic panel data model. Tourism management27(2): 281–291.
8.
HuntMACromptonJL (2008) Investigating attraction compatibility in an East Texas City. International Journal of Tourism Research10(3): 237–246.
KlenoskyDB (2002) The “pull” of tourism destinations: A means-end investigation. Journal of Travel Research40(4): 396–403.
11.
LeaskA (2010) Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management. Tourism Management31(2): 155–166.
12.
LueCCCromptonJLFesenmaierDR (1993) Conceptualization of multi-destination pleasure trips. Annals of Tourism Research20(2): 289–301.
13.
MajewskaJ (2015) Inter-regional agglomeration effects in tourism in Poland. Tourism Geographies17(3): 408–436.
14.
MartinCAWittSF (1987) Tourism demand forecasting models: Choice of appropriate variable to represent tourists’ cost of living. Tourism management8(3): 233–246.
15.
McKercherB (2001) A comparison of main-destination visitors and through travelers at a dual-purpose destination. Journal of Travel Research39(4): 433–441.
16.
MorleyCL (1994) The use of CPI for tourism prices in demand modelling. Tourism Management15(5): 342–346.
17.
PapatheodorouA (2006) Corporate rivalry, market power and competition issues in tourism: An introduction. In: PapatheodorouA (ed), Corporate Rivalry and Market Power, Competition Issues in the Tourism Industry. London: I. B. Tauris, pp. 1–19.
18.
PoudyalNCPaudelBGreenGT (2013) Estimating the impact of impaired visibility on the demand for visits to national parks. Tourism economics19(2): 433–452.
19.
ReynisdottirMSongHAgrusaJ (2008) Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management29(6): 1076–1083.
20.
SantosGEDORamosVRey MaquieiraJ (2012) Determinants of multi-destination tourism trips in Brazil. Tourism Economics18(6): 1331–1349.
21.
SmeralE (1988) Tourism demand, economic theory and econometrics: An integrated approach. Journal of Travel Research26(4): 38–43.
22.
SternbergE (1997) The iconography of the tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research24(4): 951–969.
23.
SwarbrookeJ (2001) Key challenges for visitor attraction managers in the UK. Journal of Retail and Leisure Property1(4): 318–336.
24.
TangXLLiS (2016) An optimized gap model to measure inter-regional tourism spillover effects: A demand perspective. Tourism Turbine31(6):17–37.
25.
TideswellCFaulknerB (1999) Multidestination travel patterns of international visitors to Queensland. Journal of Travel Research37(4): 364–374.
26.
TideswellCFaulknerB (2003) Identifying antecedent factors to the traveler’s pursuit of a multidestination travel itinerary. Tourism Analysis7(3/4): 177–190.
27.
WeidenfeldAButlerRWWilliamsAM (2010) Clustering and compatibility between tourism attractions. International Journal of Tourism Research12(1): 1–16.
28.
WeidenfeldAButlerRWilliamsAW (2011) The role of clustering, cooperation and complementarities in the visitor attraction sector. Current Issues in Tourism14(7): 595–629.
29.
WeidenfeldAWilliamsAMButlerRW (2014) Spatial competition and agglomeration in the visitor attraction sector. The Service Industries Journal34(3): 175–195.
30.
YangCHLinHLHanCC (2010) Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of world heritage sites. Tourism Management31(6): 827–837.
31.
YangYWongKK (2012) A spatial econometric approach to model spillover effects in tourism flows. Journal of Travel Research51(6): 768–778.
32.
YoonYUysalM (2005) An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tourism Management26(1): 45–56.
33.
YuXYShaRHuSF (2014) Dynamic relation and comparative analysis of tourism seasonality of neighbor scenic areas: Case study of Xidi, Hongcun and Huangshan. Geographical Research32(1): 191–200.
34.
ZhaoM (2006) Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science52(8): 1185–1199.
35.
ZhongSYLiK (2010) The spatial spillover of population dividend and the provincial economic growth. Management World4: 14–23.
36.
ZhouBQuHLiN (2016a) Attraction agglomeration and destination appeal. Tourism Economics22(6): 1245–1260.
37.
ZhouBQuHLiN (2016b) How tourist attraction agglomeration affects a regional economy. Tourism Analysis21: 603–616.
