In this article, I draw on Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen's (2001)
Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication
and Lev Manovich's (2001) The Language of New Media, which have
become prevalent texts in US writing studies fields, to describe the rubrics they
use and show how they help readers determine the materialities of multi modal or new
media texts. I also argue, however, that writing studies scholars should not rely
solely on these rubrics because they function in designerly, not readerly, ways that
would help readers understand a text's rhetorical situation. I apply the
rubrics to a new media text, ‘While Chopping Red Peppers’
(Ankerson and Sapnar, 2000), to show their limited use and to suggest that while
these multimodal and new media theories have a place in writing studies, we need
better methods and/or reading heuristics in order to interpret (and teach) such works.