Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What ethics means in the field of evaluation is largely confined to matters of face-to-face interaction of professionals with those with whom professionals work; what is commonly referred to as professional ethics. Less attention is given to the normative characteristics that are unique to evaluation professionalism. This essay focuses on the normative political characteristics of professional ethics in evaluation; that is, how the profession ought to be connected to conceptions of the citizenry and the common good. It argues for a professional ethic referred to as democratic professionalism.

Keywords

democracy democratic professionalism ethics normative stance professionalism valuing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beauchamp

Childress

(2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

Booth

(2014) Aiding Institutional Reform in Developing Countries. London: The Asia Foundation and Overseas Development Institute.

Boyte

(2013) Reinventing citizenship as public work. Civic Engagement 31. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceciviceng/31.

Boyte

(2014) Deliberative democracy, public work, and civic agency. Journal of Public Deliberation 10(1): Article 15. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol10/iss1/art15.

Boyte

Kari

(1996) Building America: The Democratic Promise of Public Work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Brint

(2006) Saving the “soul of professionalism”: Freidson’s institutional ethics and the defense of professional autonomy. Knowledge, Work, & Society 4(2): 101–29.

Davidson

(2014) It’s the very core of evaluation and makes or breaks our work: So why is it in hardly anyone’s toolkit? Evaluation Connections: The European Evaluation Society Newsletter. Available at: http://europeanevaluation.org/sites/default/files/ees_newsletter/ees-newsletter-2014-03-march-08.pdf (accessed 20 January 2018).

Denhardt

(2000) The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review 60(6): 549–59.

Denhardt

(2007) The New Public Service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

10.

Denney

Mallett

with Benson

(2017) Service Delivery and State Capacity: Findings from the Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium. London: Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium. Available at: https://securelivelihoods.org/wp-content/uploads/Service-delivery-and-state-capacity_Findings-from-the-Secure-Livelihoods-Research-Consortium.pdf (accessed 20 January 2018).

11.

Dower

(2008) The nature and scope of development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics 4(3): 183–93.

12.

Dzur

(2008) Democratic Professionalism: Citizen Participation and the Reconstruction of Professional Ethics, Identity and Practice. University Park, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

13.

Flyvbjerg

(2001) Making social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Forester

(1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

15.

Gasper

(2012) Development ethics – Why? What? How? A formulation of the field. Journal of Global Ethics 8(1): 117–35.

16.

Gouillart

Hallett

(2015) Co-creation in government. Stanford Innovation Review, Spring. Available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/co_creation_in_government.

17.

Goulet

(1971) An ethical model for the study of value. Harvard Education Review 41(2): 205–27.

18.

Goulet

(1988) Tasks and methods in development ethics. Cross Currents 38(2): 146–72.

19.

Goulet

(1996) A new discipline: Development ethics. Working paper No. 231. The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Available at: https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/231.pdf (accessed 20 January 2018).

20.

Guijt

(2015) Playing the rules of the game and other strategies. In: Eyben

Guijt

Roche

et al . (eds) The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 193–209.

21.

Holmes

(2011) Citizens’ engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Parliament of Australia, Research paper No, 1 2011-2012. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1112/12rp01.

22.

Holst

(2011) Epistocracy. Available at: https://www.uio.no/english/research/interfaculty-research-areas/democracy/news-and-events/events/seminars/2011/papers-yale-2011/Yale-Holst.pdf (accessed 20 January 2018).

23.

Hurteau

Houle

Mongiat

(2009) How legitimate and justified are judgments in program evaluation? Evaluation 15(3): 307–19.

24.

Jennings

Callahan

Wolfe

(1987) The professions: Public interest and common good. Hastings Center Report, Special Supplement 17(1): 3–12.

25.

Julnes

(2012) Managing valuation. In: Julnes

(ed.) Promoting Valuation in the Public Interest: Informing Policies for Judging Value in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 133: 3–15.

26.

King

Stevahn

Ghere

et al . (2001) Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation 22(2): 229–47.

27.

Kushner

(2016) Living life at the edge: Democracy, equity, and pragmatics in evaluation. In: Donaldson

Picciotto

(eds) Evaluation for an Equitable Society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 133–51.

28.

Levine

(2014) Civic studies. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 32(1): 29–33.

29.

Morales-Sanchez

Cabello-Medina

(2013) The role of four universal moral competencies in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 116(4): 717–34.

30.

Morris

(2008) Evaluation Ethics for Best Practice: Cases and Commentaries. New York: The Guilford Press.

31.

Morris

(2015a) Professional judgment and ethics. In: Scott

Wolfe

(eds) Community Psychology: Foundations for Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 132–56.

32.

Morris

(2015b) Research on evaluation ethics: Reflections and an agenda. In: Brandon

(ed.) Research on Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 148: 31–42.

33.

Ostrom

(1977) Public goods and public choices. In: Savas

(ed.) Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 7–49.

34.

Ramalingham

(2013) Aid on the Edge of Chaos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35.

Rest

(1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.

36.

Scriven

(2016) The last frontier of evaluation: Ethics. In: Donaldson

Picciotto

(eds) Evaluation for an Equitable Society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 11–48.

37.

Sen

(1987) On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

38.

Shutt

(2015) The politics and practice of value for money. In: Eyben

Guijt

Roche

et al. (eds) The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 57–78.

39.

Silverstein

(2017) Ethics and practical reasoning. Ethics 127(2): 353–82.

40.

Stewart

Sprinthall

Shafer

(2001) Moral development in public administration. In: Cooper

(ed.) Handbook of Administrative Ethics, 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, 457–80.

41.

Yarbrough

Shulha

Hopson

et al . (2011) The Program Evaluation Standards, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.