The purpose of this empirical study is to examine how the use of smart technologies—virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), and intelligent virtual environments (IVEs)—impacts tourists’ overall wellbeing in the context of a virtual destination tour. It also aims to explore the direct and moderating effects of tourists’ need-for-cognition (NfC) in the prestay phase. Two factors were examined in an experimental setting. The first factor, technology-type, was manipulated using four treatments reflecting four levels of sophistication: (1) static virtual tour (two-dimensional (2D) images) as a control group; (2) virtual tour with VR (360° images); (3) virtual tour with AI (intelligent chatbot plus 2D images); and (4) virtual tour with IVE (intelligent chatbot plus 360° images). The second factor, NfC, distinguished between individuals with high versus low NfC. The results indicate that (i) virtual tours enhanced by VR, AI, or IVE technology exert a positive and significant effect on tourists’ wellbeing during the prestay phase; (ii) NfC exerts a positive and significant effect on tourist overall wellbeing; and (iii) NfC moderates the relationship between a virtual tour with IVE and tourist overall wellbeing.
Al-OkailyNSAlzbounNAlrawadiehZ, et al. (2022) The impact of eudaimonic well-being on experience and loyalty: a tourism context. Journal of Services Marketing37(2): 216–231.
2.
AldossaryMMcLeanG (2022) Prolonging the influence of a vacation experience on consumers’ wellbeing—is there a role for virtual reality?Annals of Tourism Research97: 103500.
3.
AndréQCarmonZWertenbrochK, et al. (2017) Consumer choice and autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Customer Needs and Solutions5(1–2): 28–37.
4.
BagozziRP (1994) Structural equation models in marketing research: basic principles. Principles of Marketing Research3(1): 7–385.
5.
BarellaACarrascosaCBottiVJ (2008) Extending game technologies with virtual reality and multi-agent systems. In GAMEON:94–98.
6.
BertramsADickhäuserO (2012) Passionate thinkers feel better: self-control capacity as mediator of the relationship between need for cognition and affective adjustment. Journal of Individual Differences33(2): 69–75.
7.
BuhalisDLawR (2008) Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the internet—the state of eTourism research. Tourism Management29(4): 609–623.
8.
Bulchand-GidumalJWilliam SecinEO’ConnorP, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence’s impact on hospitality and tourism marketing: exploring key themes and addressing challenges. Current Issues in Tourism27(14): 2345–2362.
9.
ByeDPushkarD (2009) How need for cognition and perceived control are differentially linked to emotional outcomes in the transition to retirement. Motivation and Emotion33(3): 320–332.
10.
CacioppoJTPettyRE (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42(1): 116–131.
11.
CacioppoJTPettyRE (1984) The need for cognition: Relationship to attitudinal processes. In: McGlynnRPMadduxJEStoltenbergCDHarveyJH (eds) Social Perception in Clinical and Counseling Psychology. Lubbock: Texas Tech University, 91–119.
12.
CacioppoJTPettyREFeinsteinJA, et al. (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin119(2): 197–253.
13.
CacioppoJTPettyREKaoCF, et al. (1986) Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: an individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(5): 1032–1043.
14.
CacioppoJTPettyREMorrisKJ (1983) Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(4): 805–818.
15.
CainLNThomasJHAlonsoMJr (2019) From sci-fi to sci-fact: the state of robotics and AI in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology10(4): 624–650.
16.
CalistoMDLSarkarS (2024) A systematic review of virtual reality in tourism and hospitality: the known and the paths to follow. International Journal of Hospitality Management116: 103623.
17.
CarvalhoIIvanovS (2024) ChatGPT for tourism: applications, benefits and risks. Tourism Review79(2): 290–303.
18.
CastellacciFTveitoV (2016) The Effects of ICTs on Well-being: A Survey and a Theoretical Framework. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
19.
CastellacciFTveitoV (2018) Internet use and well-being: a survey and a theoretical framework. Research Policy47(1): 308–325.
20.
ChenCPetrickJF (2013) Health and wellness benefits of travel experiences. Journal of Travel Research52(6): 709–719.
21.
ChenYPerssonA (2002) Internet use among young and older adults: relation to psychological well-being. Educational Gerontology28(9): 731–744.
22.
ChiOHGursoyDChiCG (2022) Tourists’ attitudes toward the use of artificially intelligent (AI) devices in tourism service delivery: moderating role of service value seeking. Journal of Travel Research61(1): 170–185.
23.
ChoiYHickersonBLeeJ (2018) Investigation of the technology effects of online travel media on virtual travel experience and behavioral intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing35(3): 320–335.
24.
ChoiYHickersonBLeeJ, et al. (2022) Digital tourism and wellbeing: conceptual framework to examine technology effects of online travel media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(9): 5639.
25.
CohenAStotlandEWolfeDM (1955) An experimental investigation of need for cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology51(2): 291–294.
26.
ColeJKorkmazA (2013) First-year students’ psychological well-being and need for cognition: are they important predictors of academic engagement?Journal of College Student Development54(6): 557–569.
CotterKNHarroucheMRodriguez-BoerwinkleRM, et al. (2023) Virtual art visits: examining the effects of slow looking on well-being in an online environment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000548
29.
CoutinhoSAWooleryLM (2004) The need for cognition and life satisfaction among college students. College Student Journal38(2): 203.
30.
DeciELRyanRM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies9(1): 1–11.
31.
DengFZhangYLaiYF, et al. (2024) The influence mechanism of travel livestreaming’s (TLS) characteristics on users’ tourism well-being. Current Issues in Tourism28(1): 153–170.
32.
DeriuMBachisFMassaM (2021) Improving the user engagement in a fully immersive experience by the means of a conversational non-playable character used as a tourist guide. In: 2021 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit for Tourism, pp.1–4: IEEE.
33.
DharaniMJyostnaJVSLSucharithaE, et al. (2020) Interactive transport enquiry with AI chatbot. In: 2020 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), pp.1271–1276: IEEE.
DienerESeligmanMEP (2004) Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest5(1): 1–31.
36.
DoborjehZHemmingtonNDoborjehM, et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence: a systematic review of methods and applications in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management34(3): 1154–1176.
37.
DroletAWilliamsPLau-GeskL (2007) Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters18(4): 211–221.
Femenia-SerraFNeuhoferB (2018) Smart tourism experiences: conceptualisation, key dimensions and research agenda. Journal of Regional Research42: 129–150.
40.
FilepSDeeryM (2010) Towards a picture of tourists’ happiness. Tourism Analysis15(4): 399–410.
41.
FilepSKondjaAWongCCK, et al. (2024) The role of technology in users’ wellbeing: conceptualizing digital wellbeing in hospitality and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management33(5): 583–601.
42.
FitzpatrickKKDarcyAVierhileM (2017) Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (WoeBot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health4(2): e19.
43.
FlaviánCIbáñez-SánchezSOrúsC (2020) Impacts of technological embodiment through virtual reality on potential guests’ emotions and engagement. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management30(1): 1–20.
44.
FleischhauerMEngeSBrockeB, et al. (2010) Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(1): 82–96.
45.
Florido-BenítezLDel Alcázar MartínezB (2024) How artificial intelligence (AI) is powering new tourism marketing and the future agenda for smart tourist destinations. Electronics13(21): 4151.
46.
FoleyNO’ConnellELehaneE, et al. (2016) PATI: patient accessed tailored information: a pilot study to evaluate the effect on preoperative breast cancer patients of information delivered via a mobile application. The Breast30: 54–58.
47.
FuertesJLGonzálezÁLMariscalG, et al. (2007) Developing virtual storytellers for the virtual alhambra. In: International Conference on Virtual Storytelling, pp.63–74. ., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
48.
GaoYLiuH (2022) Artificial intelligence-enabled personalization in interactive marketing: a customer journey perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing17(5): 663–680.
49.
GattoCCalabreseLChiarellaS, et al. (2022) Wellbeing assessment of a museum experience in virtual reality through UCL measurement tool kit and heart rate measurement: A pilot study. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE), pp.483–488: IEEE.
50.
GauthierKJChristopherANWalterMI, et al. (2006) Religiosity, religious doubt, and the need for cognition: their interactive relationship with life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies7(2): 139–154.
51.
GilbertDAbdullahJ (2002) A study of the impact of the expectation of a holiday on an individual’s sense of well-being. Journal of Vacation Marketing8(4): 352–361.
52.
GilbertDAbdullahJ (2004) Holidaytaking and the sense of well-being. Annals of Tourism Research31(1): 103–121.
53.
GrassJDörendahlJLosereitT, et al. (2023) Thinking to promote happiness: need for cognition, subjective well-being, and burnout in different populations. Journal of Research in Personality105: 104383.
54.
GretzelUJamalT (2009) Conceptualizing the creative tourist class: technology, mobility, and tourism experiences. Tourism Analysis14(4): 471–481.
55.
GretzelUStankovU (2021) ICTs and well-being: challenges and opportunities for tourism. Information Technology & Tourism23(1): –4.
56.
GrovéC (2021) Co-developing a mental health and wellbeing chatbot with and for young people. Frontiers in Psychiatry11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.606041
57.
GrundnerLNeuhoferB (2021) The bright and dark sides of artificial intelligence: a futures perspective on tourist destination experiences. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management19: 100511.
58.
GursoyDChiOHLuL, et al. (2019) Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management49: 157–169.
59.
GuttentagDA (2010) Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management31(5): 637–651.
60.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBF, et al. (2018) Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.Pearson Prentice Hall.
61.
HavrdaMKlocekA (2023) Well-being impact assessment of artificial intelligence – a search for causality and proposal for an open platform for well-being impact assessment of AI systems. Evaluation and Program Planning99: 102294.
62.
HeZWuLLiX (2018) When art meets tech: the role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tourism Management68: 127–139.
63.
HuangCGooJNamK, et al. (2017) Smart tourism technologies in travel planning: the role of exploration and exploitation. Information & Management54(6): 757–770.
64.
HuangYCBackmanKFBackmanSJ, et al. (2016) Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: an integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research18(2): 116–128.
65.
HudsonSMatson-BarkatSPallaminN, et al. (2019) With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience. Journal of Business Research100: 459–468.
66.
HutaVRyanRM (2010) Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies11(6): 735–762.
67.
HwangJLeeJ (2018) A strategy for enhancing senior tourists’ well-being perception: focusing on the experience economy. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing36(3): 314–329.
68.
InksterBSardaSSubramanianV (2018) An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (WYSA) for digital mental well-being: real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth6(11): e12106.
Jiménez-BarretoJRubioNCampoS, et al. (2020) Linking the online destination brand experience and brand credibility with tourists’ behavioral intentions toward a destination. Tourism Management79: 104101.
74.
KangJ (2020) Identifying antecedents and consequences of well-being: the case of cruise passengers. Tourism Management Perspectives33: 100609.
75.
KeyesCLMShmotkinDRyffCD (2002) Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6): 1007–1022.
76.
KimHLeeSUysalM, et al. (2015) Nature-based tourism: motivation and subjective well-being. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing32(sup1): S76–S96.
77.
KimMJHallCM (2019) A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management46: 236–249.
78.
KimMJLeeCPreisMW (2020) The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: the moderating role of technology readiness. Telematics and Informatics49: 101349.
79.
KiourtCPavlidisGKoutsoudisA, et al. (2017) Multi-agents based virtual environments for cultural heritage. In: 2017 XXVI International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), pp.1–6: IEEE.
80.
KirkRE (1995) Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
81.
KnoblochURobertsonKAitkenR (2016) Experience, emotion, and eudaimonia: a consideration of tourist experiences and well-being. Journal of Travel Research56(5): 651–662.
82.
KonstantopoulouCVarelasSLiargovasP (2024) Well-being and tourism: a systematic literature review. Economies12(10): 81.
83.
KühlTEitelADamnikG, et al. (2014) The impact of disfluency, pacing, and students’ need for cognition on learning with multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior35: 189–198.
84.
LaukkanenSKarantaIKotovirtaV, et al. (2004) Adding intelligence to virtual reality. In: ECAI. Vol. 16, p. 1136.
85.
LeeSMFFilepSVadaS, et al. (2022) Webcam travel: a preliminary examination of psychological well-being. Tourism and Hospitality Research: 146735842211458. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584221145818.
86.
LiDBrowneGJ (2016) The role of need for cognition and mood in online flow experience. Journal of Computer Information Systems46(3): 11–17.
87.
LiYSongHGuoR (2021) A study on the causal process of virtual reality tourism and its attributes in terms of their effects on subjective well-being during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(3): 1019.
88.
LingECTussyadiahITuomiA, et al. (2021) Factors influencing users’ adoption and use of conversational agents: a systematic review. Psychology & Marketing38(7): 1031–1051.
89.
LoureiroSMCGuerreiroJAliF (2020) 20 Years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: a text-mining approach. Tourism Management77: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104028
90.
LuckASayerF (2023) Digital engagement and wellbeing: the impact of museum digital resources on user wellbeing during COVID-19. Heritage & Society: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2023.2228173.
MachidonOMDuguleanaMCarrozzinoM (2018) Virtual humans in cultural heritage ICT applications: a review. Journal of Cultural Heritage33: 249–260.
93.
MaitiDAwasthiA (2020) ICT exposure and the level of wellbeing and progress: a cross country analysis. Social Indicators Research147(1): 311–343.
94.
McDoolEPowellPARobertsJ, et al. (2020) The internet and children’s psychological wellbeing. Journal of Health Economics69: 102274.
95.
McLeanGAlyahyaMBarhorstJB, et al. (2023) Examining the influence of virtual reality tourism on consumers’ subjective wellbeing. Tourism Management Perspectives46: 101088.
96.
NannelliMCaponeFLazzerettiL (2023) Artificial intelligence in hospitality and tourism. State of the art and future research avenues. European Planning Studies31(7): 1325–1344.
97.
NawijnJMarchandMAGVeenhovenR, et al. (2010) Vacationers happier, but most not happier after a holiday. Applied Research in Quality of Life5(1): 35–47.
98.
NeuhoferBBuhalisDLadkinA (2014) A typology of technology-enhanced tourism experiences. International Journal of Tourism Research16(4): 340–350.
99.
OlsonKRCampCJFullerDJ (1984) Curiosity and need for cognition. Psychological Reports54(1): 71–74.
100.
OsbergTM (1987) The convergent and discriminant validity of the need for cognition scale. Journal of Personality Assessment51(3): 441–450.
101.
PavicKChabyLGricourtT, et al. (2023) Feeling virtually present makes me happier: the influence of immersion, sense of presence, and video contents on positive emotion induction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking26(4): 238–245.
102.
PettyREJarvisWBG (1996) An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In: SchwarzNSudmanS (eds) Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 221–257.
103.
PillaiRSivathanuB (2020) Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management32(10): 3199–3226. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0259
104.
PopAMarian-PotraAHognogiG, et al. (2024) Connecting virtual tours with their tourists through immersive triggers. Current Issues in Tourism: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2392757.
105.
PrenticeCLoureiroSMCGuerreiroJ (2023) Engaging with intelligent voice assistants for wellbeing and brand attachment. Journal of Brand Management30(5): 449–460.
106.
PykeSHartwellHBlakeA, et al. (2016) Exploring well-being as a tourism product resource. Tourism Management55: 94–105.
107.
RatherRA (2024) AI-powered ChatGPT in the hospitality and tourism industry: benefits, challenges, theoretical framework, propositions and future research directions. Tourism Recreation Research1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2023.2287799
108.
ReevesALWatsonPJRamseyA, et al. (1995) Private self-consciousness factors, need for cognition, and depression. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality10(2): 431–443.
109.
RyanRMDeciEL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology52(1): 141–166.
110.
RyffCD (1989) Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(6): 1069–1081.
111.
SadowskiCJCogburnHE (1997) Need for cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. The Journal of Psychology131(3): 307–312.
112.
SalahMAlhalbusiHIsmailMM, et al. (2023) Chatting with ChatGPT: decoding the mind of Chatbot users and unveiling the intricate connections between user perception, trust and stereotype perception on self-esteem and psychological well-being. Current Psychology43(9): 7843–7858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04989-0
113.
SharmaGChandraSVenkatramanS, et al. (2016) Artificial neural network in virtual reality: a survey. International Journal of Virtual Reality15(2): 44–52.
114.
ShenPWanDLiJ (2022) How human–computer interaction perception affects consumer well-being in the context of online retail: from the perspective of autonomy. Nankai Business Review International14(1): 102–127.
115.
SolimanMCardosoLFeijó de AlmeidaG, et al. (2021) Mapping smart experiences in tourism: a bibliometric approach. European Journal of Tourism Research28: 2809.
116.
SoubeletASalthouseTA (2017) Does need for cognition have the same meaning at different ages?Assessment24(8): 987–998.
117.
StankovUGretzelU (2021) Digital well-being in the tourism domain: mapping new roles and responsibilities. Information Technology & Tourism23(1): 5–17.
118.
StrobelAAnackerKStrobelA (2017) Cognitive engagement mediates the relationship between positive life events and positive emotionality. Frontiers in Psychology8: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01861
119.
SuLTangBNawijnJ (2020) Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being pattern changes: intensity and activity. Annals of Tourism Research84: 103008.
120.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2007) Experimental Designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
121.
TanWK (2018) From fantasy to reality: a study of pre-trip planning from the perspective of destination image attributes and temporal psychological distance. Service Business12(1): 65–84.
122.
TrahanMHSmithKSTalbotTB (2019) Past, present, and future: editorial on virtual reality applications to human services. Journal of Technology in Human Services37(1): 1–12.
TussyadiahI (2020) A review of research into automation in tourism: launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on artificial intelligence and robotics in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research81: 102883.
125.
UrielE (1995) Análisis de datos: Series temporales y análisis multivariante. AC.
126.
WanCKBOnuikeAJ (2021) Illuminating opportunities for smart tourism innovation that foster sustainable tourist well-being using Q methodology. Sustainability13(14): 7929.
127.
WilcoxR (1987) New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology38: 29–60.
128.
WooSEHarmsPDKuncelNR (2007) Integrating personality and intelligence: typical intellectual engagement and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences43(6): 1635–1639.
129.
XiW (2020) Research on application of artificial intelligence in VR games. In: Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining VI. IOS Press, 247–254.
130.
YazdaniNSiedleckiKL (2021) Mediators of the relationship between cognition and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies22(7): 3091–3109.
131.
ZhangAXiaoH (2024) Psychological well-being from virtual tourism: a mixed method approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2024.2343066.
132.
ZhangBZhuYDengJ, et al. (2022a) “I am here to assist your tourism”: predicting continuance intention to use ai-based chatbots for tourism. Does gender really matter?International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction39(9): 1887–1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2124345
133.
ZhangHGursoyDXuH (2017) The effects of associative slogans on tourists’ attitudes and travel intention. Journal of Travel Research56(2): 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515627029
134.
ZhangSLiYRuanW, et al. (2022b) Would you enjoy virtual travel? The characteristics and causes of virtual tourists’ sentiment under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism Management88: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104429
135.
ZhaoYDaYWangL, et al. (2023) The rise of artificial intelligence, the fall of human wellbeing?International Journal of Social Welfare33(1): 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12586
136.
ZhongJWuWZhaoF (2022) The impact of internet use on the subjective well-being of Chinese residents: from a multi-dimensional perspective. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950287
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
