The purposive use of theory is a foundational component of research, which underpins the design, methodology, measures, interventions, and interpretation of the research project. This should be considered from the time the nascent idea of the research is born, until the final interpretation of results and write up of the discussion. Several theories relevant to telemedicine are described, discussed, and linked to typical research questions in the field.
HsiaoCHYangC. The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis. Int J Inf Manag2011; 31: 128–136.
2.
WhittenPJohannessenLKSoerensenT. A systematic review of research methodology in telemedicine studies. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 230–235.
3.
GammonDJohannessenLKSorensenT. An overview and analysis of theories employed in telemedicine studies. A field in search of an identity. Methods Inf Med2008; 47: 260–269.
4.
Gagnon MP. Information and communication technology adoption by healthcare professionals: An overview of theoretical models and their application. In: IADIS international conference applied computing, San Sebastian, Spain, 25–28 February 2006.
5.
EgedeLAciemoRKnappRG. Psychotherapy for depression in older veterans via telemedicine: A randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry2015; 2: 693–701.
6.
McDowellJEMcCleanSFitzGibbonF. A randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of home-based health care with telemonitoring in patients with COPD. J Telemed Telecare2015; 21: 80–87.
7.
ZanaboniPWoottonR. Adoption of telemedicine: From pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2012; 12: 1–1.
8.
DarkinsA. The growth of telehealth services in the Veterans Health Administration between 1994 and 2014: A study in the diffusion of innovation. Telemed J E Health2014; 20: 761–768.
9.
BrooksEMansonSMBairB. The diffusion of telehealth in rural American Indian communities: A retrospective survey of key stakeholders. Telemed J E Health2012; 18: 60–66.
10.
RhoMJKimHSChungK. Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine for diabetes management. Cluster Comput2015; 18: 321–331.
11.
LiuLCruzAMRinconAR. What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disab Rehab2015; 37: 447–455.
12.
GagnonMPOrrunoEAsuaJ. Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals’ adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemed J E Health2012; 18: 54–59.
13.
HendersonCKnappMFernandezJ-L. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ2013; 346: f1035–f1035.
14.
Darkins A, Kendall S, Edmonson E, et al. Reduced cost and mortality using home telehealth to promote self-management of complex chronic conditions: A retrospective matched cohort study of 4,999 veteran patients. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 70–76.
15.
Jodar-SanchezFOrtegaFParraC. Cost-utility analysis of a telehealth programme for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with long-term oxygen therapy. J Telemed Telecare2014; 20: 307–316.
16.
Bouramrane M-M, Osbourne J and Mair FS. Understanding the implementation and integration of remote and tele-health services. An overview of normalization process theory. 5th International conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth), IEEE, Dublin, Ireland, 23–26 May 2011, pp. 300–307.
17.
GoddenDJKingG. Rational development of telehealth to support primary care respiratory medicine: Patient distribution and organisational factors. Prim Care Respir J2011; 20: 415–420.
18.
MairFSHiscockJBeatonSC. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Illn2008; 4: 110–117.
19.
MorrisonJG. Understanding the work of telehealth implementation using normalization process theory, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University, 2014.
20.
Hu PJ-H. Evaluating telemedicine systems success: A revised model. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences IEEE, Hawaii, 6–9 January 2003.
21.
JeanCJankovicMCardinalJS-L. Predictive modelling of telehealth system deployment. J Simulation2015; 9: 182–194.
22.
MayCFinchTCornfordJ. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?BMC Health Serv Res2011; 11: 131–131.
23.
HendyJChrysanthakiTBarlowJ. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: The whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res2012; 12: 403–403.
24.
BroensTHHuis in’t VeldRMVollenbroek-HuttenMM. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: A literature study. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 303–309.
25.
StevensonDHutchinsMSmithJ. Human-centred evaluation for broadband tertiary outpatient telehealth: A case study. Int J Human Computer Interact2010; 26: 506–536.
26.
NicoliniD. The work to make telemedicine work: A social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med2006; 62: 2754–2767.
27.
StrongeAJNicholsTRogersWA. Systematic human factors evaluation of a teledermatology system within the U.S. military. Telemed J E Health2008; 14: 25–34.
28.
BareissW. Telemedicine in South Dakota: A cultural studies approach. New Media Soc2001; 3: 327–355.
29.
ChoSMathiassenLRobeyD. The dialectics of resilience: A multilevel analysis of a teleheath innovation. Int Fed Info Proc2006; 206: 339–357.
30.
GreenhalghTProctorRWhertonJ. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: Discourse analysis. BMJ Open2012; 2: e001574–e001574.
31.
LinF-RHsiehP-S. Analyzing the sustainability of a newly developed service: An activity theory perspective. Technovation2014; 34: 113–125.
32.
LeukelJFernandesJHeidebrechtAAgency theory in e-healthcare and telemedicine: A literature study. In: WickramasingheN (ed). Critical issues for the development of sustainable e-health solutions, USA: Springer, 2012.
33.
KairyDLehouxPVincentC. Exploring routine use of telemedicine through a case study in rehabilitation. Rev Panam Salud Publica2014; 35: 337–344.
34.
KeldersSMKokRNOssebaardHC. Persuasive system design does matter: A systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res2012; 14: e152–e152.
35.
GrahamMLUesugiKHNeiderdeppeJ. The theory, development and implementation of an e-intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: e-Moms Roc. Telemed J E Health2014; 20: 1135–1142.
36.
Cowan LT, Van Wegenen SA, Brown BA, et al. Apps of steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? A content analysis of exercise apps for the presence of behavior change theory. Health Educ Behav 2012; 40: 133–139.
37.
NepalSLiJJang-JaccardJ. A framework for telehealth program evaluation. Telemed J E Health2014; 20: 393–404.
38.
KidholmKEkelandAGJensenLK. A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: MAST. Int J Technol Assess Health Care2012; 28: 44–51.
39.
AgboolaSHaleTMMastersC. ‘Real world’ practical evaluation strategies: A review of telehealth evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc2014; 3: e75–e75.
40.
RogersEM. Diffusion of innovation, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press, 2003.
41.
EstabrooksCADerksenLWintherC. The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilisation field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implement Sci2008; 3: 49–49.
42.
MenachemiNBurkeDEAyersDJ. Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine – a multiple adopter perspective. J Med Syst2004; 28: 617–632.
43.
KingGRichardsHGoddenD. Adoption of telemedicine in Scottish remote and rural general practices: A qualitative study. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 382–386.
44.
KowitlawakulY. The technology acceptance model: Predicting nurses' intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). Comput Inform Nurs2011; 29: 411–418.
45.
OrrunoEGagnonMPAsuaJ. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17: 303–307.
46.
HoldenRJKarshB-T. The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform2010; 43: 159–172.
47.
PalmerGHoT. Health economics: A critical and global analysis, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
48.
BergmoTS. Approaches to economic evaluation in telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 181–184.
49.
CusackCMPanEHookJM. The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare2008; 14: 167–168.
50.
MayCGaskLAtkinsonT. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: The case of telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med2001; 52: 1889–1901.
51.
MayCFinchTMairF. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res2006; 7: 148–148.
52.
MayC. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci2013; 8: 18–18.
53.
MayCRMairFFinchT. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization process theory. Implement Sci2009; 4: 29–29.
54.
PlsekPGreenhalghT. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ2001; 323: 625–628.
55.
CoieraE. Why e-health is so hard. Med J Aust2013; 198: 178–179.
56.
RufoRZ. Use of change management theories in gaining acceptance of telemedicine technology. Crit Care Nurs Q2012; 35: 322–327.
ParmelliEFlodgrenGBeyerF. The effectiveness of strategies to change organistional culture to improve healthcare performance: A systematic review. Implement Sci2011; 6: 33–33.
59.
DemirisGCharnessNKrupinskiE. The role of human factors in telehealth. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 447–453.
60.
Charness N, Demiris G and Krupinski E. Designing telehealth for an aging population: A human factors perspective. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011.
61.
SittigDFAshJS. On the importance of using a multidimensional sociotechnical model to study health information technology. Ann Fam Med2011; 9: 390–391.
62.
LehouxPSicotteCDenisJL. The theory of use behind telemedicine: How compatible with physicians’ clinical routines?Soc Sci Med2002; 54: 889–904.
63.
ColemanAColemanMF. Activity theory framework: A basis for e-health readiness assessment in health institutions. J Comm2013; 4: 95–100.
64.
GagnonMPGodinGGagneC. An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform2003; 71: 103–115.
65.
SuterPSuterNSJohnstonD. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag2011; 14: 87–92.
66.
RileyWTRiveraDEAtienzaAA. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: Are our theories up to the task?Transl Behav Med2011; 1: 53–71.
67.
van DykL. A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int J Environ Res Public Health2014; 11: 1279–1298.
68.
BashshurRShannonGSapciH. Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health2005; 11: 296–316.
69.
GrigsbyJBregaADevoreBS. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research. Telemed J E Health2005; 11: 317–328.
WardR. The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy Technol2013; 2: 222–228.
72.
Wade VA, Eliott JA and Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res 2014; 24: 682–694.
73.
Mansouri-Rad P, Mahmood MA, Thompson SE, et al. Cuture matters: Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine. System Sciences IEEE 2013, 46th Hawaii international conference, Hawaii, 7–10 January 2013, pp. 2525–2524.
74.
Obstfelder A, Engeseth K and Wynn R. Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications. Implement Sci 2007; 2: 1–11.
75.
MayCHarrisonRFinchT. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc2003; 10: 596–604.
76.
GundimRSChaoWL. A graphical representation model for telemedicine and telehealth centre sustainability. Telemed J E Health2011; 17: 164–168.
77.
CorbinJStraussA. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2008.
78.
Saigi-RubioFTorrent-SellensJJimenez-ZarcoA. Drivers of telemedicine use: Comparative evidence from samples of Spanish, Colombian and Bolivian physicians. Implement Sci2014; 9: 128–128.
79.
ChauPYKHuPJ-H. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Inform Manag2002; 39: 297–311.
80.
TsaiC. Integrating social captital theory, social cognitive theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health2014; 11: 4905–4925.
