Some couples find in infertility the bonding opportunities that reinforce their relationship. Using an interpretative phenomenological analysis, this study examined marital benefits in three couples seeking fertility treatment. Interviews revealed five types of benefits: being engaged in a shared hardship, feeling closer to one another, feeling reassured in the relationship, developing a satisfying communication and support behaviors, and having faith in the couple’s capacity to face adversity. A dyadic analysis also illustrated how marital benefits developed in each couple. Marital benefits nourished marital satisfaction, thus underscoring their importance to help couples cope through fertility treatment.
BodenmannG (2005) Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonTKayserKBodenmannG (eds) Couples Coping With Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 33–50.
2.
BrockiJMWeardenAJ (2006) A critical evaluation of the use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health21(1): 87–108.
3.
ChachamovichJRChachamovichEEzerH, et al. (2010) Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology31(2): 101–110.
4.
ChanCHChanCLNgEH, et al. (2012) Incorporating spirituality in psychosocial group intervention for women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A prospective randomized controlled study. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice85(4): 356–373.
5.
CovingtonSNBurnsLH (2006) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DanilukJC (2001) If We had it to do over again…: Couples’ reflections on their experiences of infertility treatments. The Family Journal9(2): 122–133.
7.
GloverLMcLellanAWeaverSM (2009) What does having a fertility problem mean to couples?Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology27(4): 401–418.
8.
GreilALSlauson-BlevinsKMcQuillianJ (2010) The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health and Illness32(1): 140–162.
9.
LeeGLHui ChoiWHChanCH, et al. (2009) Life after unsuccessful IVF treatment in an assisted reproduction unit: A qualitative analysis of gains through loss among Chinese persons in Hong Kong. Human Reproduction24(8): 1920–1929.
10.
PaschLASullivanKT (2017) Stress and coping in couples facing infertility. Current Opinion in Psychology13: 131–135.
11.
PaulMSBergerRBerlowN, et al. (2010) Posttraumatic growth and social support in individuals with infertility. Human Reproduction25(1): 133–141.
12.
PéloquinKBrassardAArpinV, et al. (2018) Who’s fault is it? Blame predicting psychological adjustment and couple satisfaction in couples seeking fertility treatments. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics& Gynecology39(1): 64–72. DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1289369.
13.
PetersKJacksonDRudgeT (2011) Surviving the adversity of childlessness: Fostering resilience in couples. Contemporary Nurse40(1): 130–140.
14.
PetersonBDBoivinJNorreJ, et al. (2012) An introduction to infertility counseling: A guide for mental health and medical professionals. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics29(3): 243–248.
15.
PetersonBDPirritanoMBlockJM, et al. (2011) Marital benefit and coping strategies in men and women undergoing unsuccessful fertility treatments over a 5-year period. Fertility and Sterility95(5): 1759–1763.
16.
PhillipsEElanderJMontagueJ (2014) Managing multiple goals during fertility treatment: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology19(4): 531–543.
17.
ReadSCCarrierMEBoucherME, et al. (2014) Psychosocial services for couples in infertility treatment: What do couples really want?Patient Education and Counseling94(3): 390–395.
18.
ReganTWLambertSDKellyB, et al. (2015) Couples coping with cancer: Exploration of theoretical frameworks from dyadic studies. Psycho-Oncology24(12): 1605–1617.
19.
RidenourAFYorgasonJBPetersonB (2009) The infertility resilience model: Assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemporary Family Therapy31(1): 34–51.
20.
RockliffHELightmanSLRhidianE, et al. (2014) A systematic review of psychosocial factors associated with emotional adjustment in in vitro fertilization patients. Human Reproduction Update20(4): 594–613.
21.
SchmidtL (1996) Psykosociale konsekvenser af infertilitet og behandling [Psychosocial Consequences of Infertility and Treatment]. Copenhagen: FADL’s Press.
22.
SchmidtL (2006) Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences. Danish Medical Bulletin53(4): 390–417.
23.
SchmidtLHolsteinBChristensenU, et al. (2005) Does infertility cause marital benefit? An epidemiological study of 2250 women and men in fertility treatment. Patient Education and Counseling59(3): 244–251.
24.
SmithJA (2011) Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review5(1): 9–27.
SteuberKRHaunani SolomonD (2008) Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships25(5): 831–855.
27.
UmmelDAchilleM (2016) How not to let secrets out when conducting qualitative research with dyads. Qualitative Health Research26(6): 807–815.
28.
YingLLokeAY (2016) An analysis of the concept of partnership in the couples undergoing infertility treatment. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy42(3): 243–256.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
